Quantifying uncertainty in nanofiltration transport models for enhanced metals recovery

被引:8
|
作者
Rehman, Danyal [1 ,2 ]
Sheriff, Fareed [1 ]
Lienhard, John H. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Rohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] MIT, Ctr Computat Sci & Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Ion selectivity; Metal recovery; Transport models; Donnan exclusion; Bilevel optimization; Nanofiltration; DIELECTRIC EXCLUSION; MEMBRANE NANOFILTRATION; ELECTROLYTE-SOLUTIONS; HINDERED TRANSPORT; ION-TRANSPORT; PREDICTION; WATER; SEPARATION; PERFORMANCE; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2023.120325
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To decarbonize our global energy system, sustainably harvesting metals from diverse sourcewaters is essential. Membrane-based processes have recently shown great promise in meeting these needs by achieving high metal ion selectivities with relatively low water and energy use. An example is nanofiltration, which harnesses steric, dielectric, and Donnan exclusion mechanisms to perform size-and charge-based fractionation of metal ions. To further optimize nanofiltration systems, multicomponent models are needed; however, conventional methods necessitate large amounts of data for model calibration, introduce substantial uncertainty into the characterization process, and often yield poor results when extrapolated. In this work, we develop a new computational architecture to alleviate these concerns. Specifically, we develop a framework that: (1) reduces the data requirement for model calibration to only charged species measurements; (2) eliminates uncertainty propagation problems present in conventional characterization processes; (3) enables exploration of pH optimization for enhancing metal ion selectivities; and (4) enables uncertainty quantification to assess the sensitivity of partition coefficients and ion driving forces to learned pore size distributions. Our framework captures eight independent datasets comprising over 500 measurements to within & PLUSMN;15%. Our studies also suggest that the expectation-maximization algorithm can effectively learn pore size distributions and that optimizing pH can improve metal ion selectivities by a factor of 3-10x. Our findings also reveal that image charges appear to play a less pronounced role in dielectric exclusion under the studied conditions and that ion driving forces are more sensitive to pore size distributions than partition coefficients.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Positively charged nanofiltration membrane synthesis, transport models, and lanthanides separation
    Leniz-Pizarro, Francisco
    Liu, Chunqing
    Colburn, Andrew
    Escobar, Isabel C.
    Bhattacharyya, Dibakar
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2021, 620
  • [32] Electron transport enhanced molecular dynamics for metals and semi-metals
    Jones, Reese E.
    Templeton, Jeremy A.
    Wagner, Gregory J.
    Olmsted, David
    Modine, Nomand A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2010, 83 (8-9) : 940 - 967
  • [33] New Approaches to Quantifying the Magnitude and Causes of Uncertainty in Global Aerosol Models
    Carslaw, Kenneth S.
    Lee, Lindsay A.
    Pringle, Kirsty J.
    Mann, Graham W.
    Spracklen, Dominick V.
    Stier, Philip
    Pierce, Jeffrey R.
    NUCLEATION AND ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS, 2013, 1527 : 641 - 646
  • [34] Exploring Ancillary Parameters for Quantifying Interpolation Uncertainty in Digital Bathymetric Models
    Adediran, Elias
    Lowell, Kim
    Kastrisios, Christos
    Rice, Glen
    Zhang, Qi
    MARINE GEODESY, 2024, 47 (04) : 289 - 323
  • [35] Quantifying modeling uncertainty in simplified beam models for building response prediction
    Ghahari, S. Farid
    Sargsyan, Khachik
    Celebi, Mehmet
    Taciroglu, Ertugrul
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2022, 29 (11):
  • [36] Quantifying uncertainty of digital elevation models derived from topographic maps
    Weng, QH
    ADVANCES IN SPATIAL DATA HANDLING, 2002, : 403 - 418
  • [37] Quantifying uncertainty in simulations of the West African monsoon with the use of surrogate models
    Fischer, Matthias
    Knippertz, Peter
    van der Linden, Roderick
    Lemburg, Alexander
    Pante, Gregor
    Proppe, Carsten
    Marsham, John H.
    WEATHER AND CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2024, 5 (02): : 511 - 536
  • [38] Model Risk in Risk Models: Quantifying Statistical Uncertainty in Active Risk
    Khang, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 2021, 47 (03): : 51 - 65
  • [39] Enhanced recovery and recrystallization of metals due to an applied current
    Fabregue, D.
    Mouawad, B.
    Hutchinson, C. R.
    SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 2014, 92 : 3 - 6
  • [40] Quantifying subsurface parameter and transport uncertainty using surrogate modelling and environmental tracers
    Thiros, Nicholas E.
    Gardner, W. Payton
    Maneta, Marco P.
    Brinkerhoff, Douglas J.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2022, 36 (11)