Quantifying uncertainty in nanofiltration transport models for enhanced metals recovery

被引:8
|
作者
Rehman, Danyal [1 ,2 ]
Sheriff, Fareed [1 ]
Lienhard, John H. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Rohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] MIT, Ctr Computat Sci & Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Ion selectivity; Metal recovery; Transport models; Donnan exclusion; Bilevel optimization; Nanofiltration; DIELECTRIC EXCLUSION; MEMBRANE NANOFILTRATION; ELECTROLYTE-SOLUTIONS; HINDERED TRANSPORT; ION-TRANSPORT; PREDICTION; WATER; SEPARATION; PERFORMANCE; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2023.120325
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To decarbonize our global energy system, sustainably harvesting metals from diverse sourcewaters is essential. Membrane-based processes have recently shown great promise in meeting these needs by achieving high metal ion selectivities with relatively low water and energy use. An example is nanofiltration, which harnesses steric, dielectric, and Donnan exclusion mechanisms to perform size-and charge-based fractionation of metal ions. To further optimize nanofiltration systems, multicomponent models are needed; however, conventional methods necessitate large amounts of data for model calibration, introduce substantial uncertainty into the characterization process, and often yield poor results when extrapolated. In this work, we develop a new computational architecture to alleviate these concerns. Specifically, we develop a framework that: (1) reduces the data requirement for model calibration to only charged species measurements; (2) eliminates uncertainty propagation problems present in conventional characterization processes; (3) enables exploration of pH optimization for enhancing metal ion selectivities; and (4) enables uncertainty quantification to assess the sensitivity of partition coefficients and ion driving forces to learned pore size distributions. Our framework captures eight independent datasets comprising over 500 measurements to within & PLUSMN;15%. Our studies also suggest that the expectation-maximization algorithm can effectively learn pore size distributions and that optimizing pH can improve metal ion selectivities by a factor of 3-10x. Our findings also reveal that image charges appear to play a less pronounced role in dielectric exclusion under the studied conditions and that ion driving forces are more sensitive to pore size distributions than partition coefficients.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantifying demographic uncertainty: Bayesian methods for integral projection models
    Elderd, Bret D.
    Miller, Tom E. X.
    ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2016, 86 (01) : 125 - 144
  • [22] Quantifying uncertainty for temperature maps derived from computer models
    Paci, Lucia
    Gelfand, Alan E.
    Cocchi, Daniela
    SPATIAL STATISTICS, 2015, 12 : 96 - 108
  • [23] Bayesian synthesis for quantifying uncertainty in predictions from process models
    Green, EJ
    MacFarlane, DW
    Valentine, HT
    TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 20 (5-6) : 415 - 419
  • [24] QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY FOR PLANAR PSEUDO-RIGID BODY MODELS
    Lusk, Craig P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2011, VOL 6, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 67 - 73
  • [25] Quantifying Uncertainty of Deep Learning Models for the Segmentation of Geographic Atrophy
    Spaide, Theodore
    Owen, Julia
    De Sisternes, Luis
    Lewis, Warren
    Manivannan, Niranchana
    Pramil, Varsha
    Sheikh, Harris Asad
    Waheed, Nadia K.
    Lee, Cecilia S.
    Lee, Aaron Y.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [26] MARKOV RANDOM FIELD MODELS FOR QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY IN SUBSURFACE REMEDIATION
    Kaluza, M. Clara De Paolis
    Miller, Eric L.
    Abriola, Linda M.
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2015, : 4296 - 4299
  • [27] Using heuristic multi-objective optimization for quantifying predictive uncertainty associated with groundwater flow and reactive transport models
    Siade, A. J.
    Rathi, B.
    Prommer, H.
    Welter, D.
    Doherty, J.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 577
  • [28] QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY IN LONG-RANGE-TRANSPORT MODELS - A SUMMARY OF THE AMS WORKSHOP ON SOURCES AND EVALUATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN LONG-RANGE-TRANSPORT MODELS, WOODS-HOLE, MASSACHUSETTS, 18-21 SEPTEMBER 1984
    DEMERJIAN, KL
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 66 (12) : 1533 - 1540
  • [29] Quantifying travellers' evaluation of waiting time uncertainty in public transport networks
    Shelat, Sanmay
    Cats, Oded
    van Lint, J. W. C.
    TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY, 2021, 25 : 209 - 222
  • [30] Recovery of heavy metals from metal industry waste waters by chemical precipitation and nanofiltration
    Gonzalez-Munoz, Maria Jesus
    Amparo Rodriguez, Maria
    Luque, Susana
    Ramon Alvarez, Jose
    DESALINATION, 2006, 200 (1-3) : 742 - 744