Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation

被引:0
|
作者
Makisha, Nikolay [1 ]
机构
[1] Moscow State Univ Civil Engn, Res & Educ Ctr Water Supply & Wastewater Treatment, 26 Yaroslaskoye Highway, Moscow 129337, Russia
关键词
wastewater treatment; membrane bioreactor; modernization; activated sludge reactor; cost analysis;
D O I
10.3390/membranes13080746
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Modernization of wastewater treatment plants is usually caused by their significant wear and changes in the flow rate and concentration of pollutants. If there is no initial data on the flow or pollution, their determination by calculation is required, which may lead to an increase in concentration. Within the study, the modernization of treatment facilities was estimated under conditions of reduced flow and increased pollution concentration. Calculations were carried out both manually and using the CapdetWorks software package. The focus was on secondary treatment facilities as the main element of the municipal wastewater treatment plant within their upgrade from only organic pollutants removal (plug-flow reactor) to removal of both organic pollutants and nutrients (technology of the University of Cape Town). The calculations of tank volumes have shown that the concentration of pollutants has a much greater impact on them than the change in flow, especially when improvement in the treatment quality is required. The study revealed that membrane sludge separation allows tanks to be reduced in volume by 1.5-2.5 times (depending on the value of mixed liquor suspended solids) in comparison with gravity separation, which means smaller capital costs. However, membrane application requires significant energy costs for membrane aeration. For the initial data of the study, the specific energy costs for aeration before the upgrade, after the upgrade (gravity separation), and after the upgrade (membrane separation) were 0.12 kWh/m(3), 0.235 kWh/m(3), and 0.3 kWh/m(3), respectively. If the membrane lifetime is 10 years, membrane costs were determined to be 10-15% of the energy costs for aeration.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Upgrading of a biological-chemical treatment plant for cheese factory wastewater
    Rusten, B
    Siljudalen, JG
    Strand, H
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 34 (11) : 41 - 49
  • [22] Upgrading and expansion of the Kappala wastewater treatment plant operational experiences and results
    Manhem, P
    Palmgren, T
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 50 (07) : 9 - 17
  • [23] Membrane bio-reactor for textile wastewater treatment plant upgrading
    Lubello, C
    Gori, R
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 52 (04) : 91 - 98
  • [24] A new approach for upgrading biogas produced at a local wastewater treatment plant
    Boyaci, Yavuz Selim
    Uyanik, Sinan
    Yildiz, Hakan
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2024, 26 (05):
  • [25] Upgrading wastewater treatment performance
    Hlavinek, P
    ENHANCING URBAN ENVIRONMENT BY ENVIRONMENTAL UPGRADING AND RESTORATION, 2004, 43 : 195 - 202
  • [26] Performance assessment of AS-SBR and UF-MBR for hotel wastewater treatment
    Libralato, G.
    Ghirardini, A. Volpi
    Avezzu, F.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (07) : 1701 - 1709
  • [27] Performance of a bench-scale membrane pilot plant for the upgrading of biogas in a wastewater treatment plant
    Stern, SA
    Krishnakumar, B
    Charati, SG
    Amato, WS
    Friedman, AA
    Fuess, DJ
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1998, 151 (01) : 63 - 74
  • [28] Assessment of odour nuisance of wastewater treatment plant
    Guz, L.
    Piotrowicz, A.
    Guz, E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING V, 2017, : 249 - 255
  • [29] Risk assessment in municipal wastewater treatment plant
    Loj-Pilch, Magdalena
    Zakrzewska, Anita
    Zielewicz, Ewa
    11TH CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEMS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENGINEERING (EKO-DOK 2019), 2019, 100
  • [30] Upgrading of Boras wastewater treatment plant based on intelligent process and operation control
    Thornberg, DE
    Nielsen, M
    Eriksson, J
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 37 (09) : 57 - 63