Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation

被引:0
|
作者
Makisha, Nikolay [1 ]
机构
[1] Moscow State Univ Civil Engn, Res & Educ Ctr Water Supply & Wastewater Treatment, 26 Yaroslaskoye Highway, Moscow 129337, Russia
关键词
wastewater treatment; membrane bioreactor; modernization; activated sludge reactor; cost analysis;
D O I
10.3390/membranes13080746
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Modernization of wastewater treatment plants is usually caused by their significant wear and changes in the flow rate and concentration of pollutants. If there is no initial data on the flow or pollution, their determination by calculation is required, which may lead to an increase in concentration. Within the study, the modernization of treatment facilities was estimated under conditions of reduced flow and increased pollution concentration. Calculations were carried out both manually and using the CapdetWorks software package. The focus was on secondary treatment facilities as the main element of the municipal wastewater treatment plant within their upgrade from only organic pollutants removal (plug-flow reactor) to removal of both organic pollutants and nutrients (technology of the University of Cape Town). The calculations of tank volumes have shown that the concentration of pollutants has a much greater impact on them than the change in flow, especially when improvement in the treatment quality is required. The study revealed that membrane sludge separation allows tanks to be reduced in volume by 1.5-2.5 times (depending on the value of mixed liquor suspended solids) in comparison with gravity separation, which means smaller capital costs. However, membrane application requires significant energy costs for membrane aeration. For the initial data of the study, the specific energy costs for aeration before the upgrade, after the upgrade (gravity separation), and after the upgrade (membrane separation) were 0.12 kWh/m(3), 0.235 kWh/m(3), and 0.3 kWh/m(3), respectively. If the membrane lifetime is 10 years, membrane costs were determined to be 10-15% of the energy costs for aeration.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hospital wastewater: Hospital wastewater treatment plant installs MBR
    不详
    FILTRATION & SEPARATION, 2012, 49 (05): : 45 - 45
  • [2] Upgrading an anaerobic/aerobic wastewater treatment plant
    Austermann-Haun, U
    Lange, R
    Seyfried, CF
    Rosenwinkel, KH
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 37 (09) : 243 - 250
  • [3] MBR pilot plant for textile wastewater treatment and reuse
    Lubello, C.
    Caffaz, S.
    Mangini, L.
    Santianni, D.
    Caretti, C.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 55 (10) : 115 - 124
  • [4] An experimental study on the wastewater treatment plant upgrading in an asphalt plant
    Sun, Lei
    International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 2015, 8 (02): : 1064 - 1068
  • [5] Experience from the Implementation and Operation of the Biological Membrane Reactor (MBR) at the Modernized Wastewater Treatment Plant in Wydminy
    Skoczko, Iwona
    Puzowski, Pawel
    Szatylowicz, Ewa
    WATER, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 14
  • [6] COMPARISON AND UPGRADING OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS FOR WASTEWATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE BY MEANS OF MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) TECHNOLOGY
    Khosravi, Mahdi
    Gholikandi, Gagik Badalians
    Tashaouei, Hamid Reza
    SUSTAINABLE MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY FOR ENERGY, WATER, AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, : 169 - 177
  • [7] Simulation study supporting wastewater treatment plant upgrading
    Hvala, N
    Vrecko, D
    Burica, O
    Strazar, M
    Levstek, M
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (4-5) : 325 - 332
  • [8] UPGRADING OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IN A CHEMICAL FACTORY.
    Benedek, P.
    Takacs, I.
    Vallai, I.
    Water Science and Technology, 1984, 18 (01) : 75 - 82
  • [9] TWO YEARS OF THE OPERATION OF A DOMESTIC MBR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
    Pikorova, T.
    SLOVAK JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2012, 20 (02) : 28 - 36
  • [10] Application of MBR to an easily installed municipal wastewater treatment plant
    Ogoshi, M
    Suzuki, Y
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (10-11) : 287 - 293