Scaffolding safety in nursing simulation: A grounded theory

被引:1
|
作者
El-Hussein, Mohamed Toufic [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Harvey, Giuliana [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Royal Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Alberta Hlth Serv, Div Cardiol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Royal Univ, 4825 Mt Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada
关键词
Simulation; Grounded theory; Nursing students; Safety; STANDARDS; NOVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.01.003
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Simulation-based learning is a teaching technique that allows learners to apply theoretical knowl-edge to enhance patient safety. Despite limited evidence about the relationship between simulation and patient safety outcomes, nursing programs continue using simulation to improve student competencies.Purpose: To explore the processes driving the actions of nursing students while providing care for a rapidly deteriorating patient during a simulation-based experience.Method: Following the constructivist grounded theory method, the study recruited 32 undergraduate nursing students to explore their experiences during simulation-based experiences. Data were collected using semi -structured interviews over 12 months. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using constant comparison and simultaneous data collection, coding, and analysis. Results: Two theoretical categories emerged from the data to explain the processes driving the students' actions during simulation-based experiences: Nurturing and contextualizing safety. The themes revolved around a core category of "Scaffolding Safety" in simulation.Conclusion: Simulation facilitators can use the findings to build effective and targeted simulation scenarios. Scaffolding safety steers students' thinking and contextualizes patients' safety. It can be utilized as a lens to guide students and assist them with transferring skills from simulation to the clinical practice setting. Nurse educators should consider deliberately integrating the concepts of scaffolding safety into simulation-based experiences to connect theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 20
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nursing Communication in Nursing Care to Mastectomized Women: a Grounded Theory Study
    de Almeida Araujo, Iliana Maria
    da Silva, Raimunda Magalhaes
    Bonfim, Isabela Melo
    Carvalho Fernandes, Ana Fatima
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2010, 18 (01): : 54 - 60
  • [22] A caring leadership model in nursing: A grounded theory approach
    Zhang, Fengjian
    Peng, Xiao
    Huang, Lei
    Liu, Yilan
    Xu, Juan
    He, Jiao
    Guan, Chunyan
    Chang, Hongwei
    Chen, Yuqin
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (04) : 981 - 992
  • [23] Grounded theory methodology for effective decision making in nursing
    D'Angelol, Francisco
    Teresa, Sammya
    Aline, Jochen
    SALUD ARTE Y CUIDADO, 2019, 12 (01): : 47 - 57
  • [24] Using a synthesised technique for grounded theory in nursing research
    Chen, Hsiao-Yu
    Boore, Jennifer R. P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2009, 18 (16) : 2251 - 2260
  • [25] Developing a Relationship With the Computer in Nursing Practice: A Grounded Theory
    Cross, Barbara L.
    MacDonald, Marjorie
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2013, 45 (01) : 114 - 137
  • [26] Resources mobilized in nursing preceptorship: a study in Grounded Theory
    Amaral, Guida Maria Marques da Silva
    Figueiredo, Amelia Similes
    MUNDO DA SAUDE, 2022, 46 : 161 - 172
  • [27] A Grounded Theory of the Resilience Process in Postqualification Nursing Students
    Jackson, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2018, 57 (06) : 371 - 374
  • [28] Glaserian grounded theory in nursing research: Trusting emergence
    McCallin, Antoinette M.
    GROUNDED THEORY REVIEW, 2010, 9 (02): : 55 - 59
  • [29] Psychological Safety in Nursing Simulation
    Kang, Sook Jung
    Min, Hae Young
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2019, 44 (02) : E6 - E9
  • [30] Grounded Theory: A Teaching Strategy to Bridge the Theory-Practice Gap in Nursing
    El Hussein, Mohamed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2013, 12 : 703 - 704