Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding in causal inference based on exponential tilting and super learner

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Mi [1 ]
Yao, Weixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Stat, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Causal inference; unmeasured confounding; sensitivity analysis; super learner; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; SEMIPARAMETRIC REGRESSION; REPEATED OUTCOMES; PROPENSITY SCORE;
D O I
10.1080/02664763.2021.1999398
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Causal inference under the potential outcome framework relies on the strongly ignorable treatment assumption. This assumption is usually questionable in observational studies, and the unmeasured confounding is one of the fundamental challenges in causal inference. To this end, we propose a new sensitivity analysis method to evaluate the impact of the unmeasured confounder by leveraging ideas of doubly robust estimators, the exponential tilt method, and the super learner algorithm. Compared to other existing methods of sensitivity analysis that parameterize the unmeasured confounder as a latent variable in the working models, the exponential tilting method does not impose any restrictions on the structure or models of the unmeasured confounders. In addition, in order to reduce the modeling bias of traditional parametric methods, we propose incorporating the super learner machine learning algorithm to perform nonparametric model estimation and the corresponding sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, most existing sensitivity analysis methods require multivariate sensitivity parameters, which make its choice difficult and subjective in practice. In comparison, the new method has a univariate sensitivity parameter with a nice and simple interpretation of log-odds ratios for binary outcomes, which makes its choice and the application of the new sensitivity analysis method very easy for practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 760
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference under Unmeasured Confounding and Measurement Error Problems
    Diaz, Ivan
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2013, 9 (02): : 149 - 160
  • [2] Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis
    McCandless, Lawrence C.
    Somers, Julian M.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (02) : 515 - 531
  • [3] Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confounding
    Dorn, Jacob
    Guo, Kevin
    Kallus, Nathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024,
  • [4] Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in the estimation of marginal causal effects
    Ciocanea-Teodorescu, I
    Gabriel, E. E.
    Sjolander, A.
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2022, 109 (04) : 1101 - 1116
  • [5] Sensitivity Analysis of Unmeasured Confounding for the Causal Risk Ratio by Applying Marginal Structural Models
    Chiba, Yasutaka
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2010, 39 (01) : 65 - 76
  • [6] Sensitivity Analysis via the Proportion of Unmeasured Confounding
    Bonvini, Matteo
    Kennedy, Edward H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 117 (539) : 1540 - 1550
  • [7] Sensitivity analysis for interactions under unmeasured confounding
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Mukherjee, Bhramar
    Chen, Jinbo
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (22) : 2552 - 2564
  • [8] Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding of Attributable Fraction
    Chiba, Yasutaka
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 175 - 176
  • [9] Sensitivity analyses to estimate the potential impact of unmeasured confounding in causal research
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Nelson, David B.
    Nichol, Kristin L.
    Hoes, Arno W.
    Hak, Eelko
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (01) : 107 - 117
  • [10] Sensitivity to Confounding in Causal Inference: From Childhood to Adulthood
    Schofield, E. Christina
    Cheng, Patricia W.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2004, : 1215 - 1218