Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding in causal inference based on exponential tilting and super learner

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Mi [1 ]
Yao, Weixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Stat, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Causal inference; unmeasured confounding; sensitivity analysis; super learner; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; SEMIPARAMETRIC REGRESSION; REPEATED OUTCOMES; PROPENSITY SCORE;
D O I
10.1080/02664763.2021.1999398
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Causal inference under the potential outcome framework relies on the strongly ignorable treatment assumption. This assumption is usually questionable in observational studies, and the unmeasured confounding is one of the fundamental challenges in causal inference. To this end, we propose a new sensitivity analysis method to evaluate the impact of the unmeasured confounder by leveraging ideas of doubly robust estimators, the exponential tilt method, and the super learner algorithm. Compared to other existing methods of sensitivity analysis that parameterize the unmeasured confounder as a latent variable in the working models, the exponential tilting method does not impose any restrictions on the structure or models of the unmeasured confounders. In addition, in order to reduce the modeling bias of traditional parametric methods, we propose incorporating the super learner machine learning algorithm to perform nonparametric model estimation and the corresponding sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, most existing sensitivity analysis methods require multivariate sensitivity parameters, which make its choice difficult and subjective in practice. In comparison, the new method has a univariate sensitivity parameter with a nice and simple interpretation of log-odds ratios for binary outcomes, which makes its choice and the application of the new sensitivity analysis method very easy for practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 760
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BAYESIAN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR CAUSAL EFFECTS FROM 2x2 TABLES IN THE PRESENCE OF UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING WITH APPLICATION TO PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN VISITS
    Keele, Luke
    Quinn, Kevin M.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2017, 11 (04): : 1974 - 1997
  • [42] Sensitivity analysis of treatment effect to unmeasured confounding in observational studies with survival and competing risks outcomes
    Huang, Rong
    Xu, Ronghui
    Dulai, Parambir S.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (24) : 3397 - 3411
  • [43] Mediational E-values Approximate Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Mediator-Outcome Confounding
    Smith, Louisa H.
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (06) : 835 - 837
  • [44] Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects
    Imai, Kosuke
    Keele, Luke
    Yamamoto, Teppei
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (01) : 51 - 71
  • [45] A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding
    Mccandless, Lawrence C.
    Gustafson, Paul
    Levy, Adrian R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (03) : 247 - 255
  • [46] Conducting sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies using E-values: The evalue package
    Linden, Ariel
    Mathur, Maya B.
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    STATA JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (01): : 162 - 175
  • [47] Sensitivity analysis of causal inference in clinical trial subject to crossover
    Xie, H
    Heitjan, DF
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 24 : 65S - 65S
  • [48] Sensitivity analysis for causal inference using inverse probability weighting
    Shen, Changyu
    Li, Xiaochun
    Li, Lingling
    Were, Martin C.
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 53 (05) : 822 - 837
  • [49] Model-assisted sensitivity analysis for treatment effects under unmeasured confounding via regularized calibrated estimation
    Tan, Zhiqiang
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2024,
  • [50] Sensitivity analysis for unobserved confounding in causal mediation analysis allowing for effect modification, censoring and truncation
    Anita Lindmark
    Statistical Methods & Applications, 2022, 31 : 785 - 814