Sensitivity analysis for interactions under unmeasured confounding

被引:37
|
作者
VanderWeele, Tyler J. [1 ,2 ]
Mukherjee, Bhramar [3 ]
Chen, Jinbo [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
bias analysis; gene environment; independence; interaction; sensitivity analysis; unmeasured confounding; LUNG-CANCER; SYNERGISM; SUSCEPTIBILITY; SMOKING; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/sim.4354
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We develop a sensitivity analysis technique to assess the sensitivity of interaction analyses to unmeasured confounding. We give bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for interaction under unmeasured confounding on both additive and multiplicative scales. We provide simplified formulas in the case in which either one of the two factors does not interact with the unmeasured confounder in its effects on the outcome. An interesting consequence of the results is that if the two exposures of interest are independent (e.g., geneenvironment independence), even under unmeasured confounding, if the estimate of the interaction is nonzero, then either there is a true interaction between the two factors or there is an interaction between one of the factors and the unmeasured confounder; an interaction must be present in either scenario. We apply the results to two examples drawn from the literature. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2552 / 2564
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity Analysis via the Proportion of Unmeasured Confounding
    Bonvini, Matteo
    Kennedy, Edward H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 117 (539) : 1540 - 1550
  • [2] Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding of Attributable Fraction
    Chiba, Yasutaka
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 175 - 176
  • [3] Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference under Unmeasured Confounding and Measurement Error Problems
    Diaz, Ivan
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2013, 9 (02): : 149 - 160
  • [4] Bayesian sensitivity analysis to unmeasured confounding for misclassified data
    Zhou, Qi
    Chin, Yoo-Mi
    Stamey, James D.
    Song, Joon Jin
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 104 (04) : 577 - 596
  • [5] Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies
    McCandless, Lawrence C.
    Gustafson, Paul
    Levy, Adrian
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (11) : 2331 - 2347
  • [6] Simple yet sharp sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding
    Pena, Jose M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE, 2022, 10 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [7] Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in Meta-Analyses
    Mathur, Maya B.
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 115 (529) : 163 - 172
  • [8] Bayesian sensitivity analysis to unmeasured confounding for misclassified data
    Qi Zhou
    Yoo-Mi Chin
    James D. Stamey
    Joon Jin Song
    [J]. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2020, 104 : 577 - 596
  • [9] Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis
    McCandless, Lawrence C.
    Somers, Julian M.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (02) : 515 - 531
  • [10] The Sensitivity of Counterfactual Fairness to Unmeasured Confounding
    Kilbertus, Niki
    Ball, Philip J.
    Kusner, Matt J.
    Weller, Adrian
    Silva, Ricardo
    [J]. 35TH UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE (UAI 2019), 2020, 115 : 616 - 626