Bone mineral density derived from cardiac CT scans: Using contrast enhanced scans for opportunistic screening

被引:1
|
作者
Cheneymann, Andia [1 ]
Therkildsen, Josephine [2 ,3 ]
Winther, Simon [1 ]
Nissen, Louise [1 ]
Thygesen, Jesper [4 ]
Langdahl, Bente L. [3 ,5 ]
Hauge, Ellen-Margrethe [2 ,3 ]
Bottcher, Morten [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Herning, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Engn, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Aarhus Univ, Univ Clin Cardiovasc Res, Godstrup Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Hospitalspk 15, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
关键词
Osteoporosis; Contrast media; Bone density; X -Ray computed tomography; Diagnosis; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST; SAGITTAL REFORMATIONS; CLINICAL-USE; OSTEOPOROSIS; MDCT; MANAGEMENT; ERRORS; ADULTS; SPINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101441
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Osteoporosis is under-diagnosed and often co-exists with other diseases. Very low bone mineral density (BMD) indicates risk of osteoporosis and opportunistic screening for low BMD in CT-scans has been suggested. In a non-contrast enhanced thoracic CT scan, the scan-field-of-view includes vertebrae enabling BMD estimation. However, many CT scans are obtained by administration of contrast material. If the impact of contrast enhancement on BMD measurements could be quantified, considerably more patients are eligible for screening. Methods: This study investigated the impact of intravenous contrast on thoracic BMD measurements in cardiac CT scans pre-and post-contrast, including different contrast trigger levels of 130 and 180 Hounsfield units (HU). BMD was measured using quantitative CT with asynchronous calibra-tion. Results: In 195 participants undergoing cardiac CT (mean age 57 +/- 9 years, 37 % females) contrast increased mean thoracic BMD from 116 +/- 33 mg/cm3 (non-enhanced CT) to 130 +/- 38 mg/cm3 (contrast-enhanced CT) (p<0.001). Using clinical cut-off values for very low (<80 mg/cm3) and low BMD (<120 mg/ cm3) showed that 24 % (47/195 participants) were misclassified when BMD was measured on contrast-enhanced CT-scans. Of the misclassified patients, 6 % (12/195 participants) were categorized as having low BMD despite having very low BMD on the non-enhanced images. Contrast-CT using a higher contrast trig-ger level showed a significant increase in BMD compared to the lower trigger level (119 +/- 32 vs. 135 +/- 40 mg/ cm3, p<0.01). Conclusion: For patients undergoing cardiac CT, using contrast-enhanced images to assess BMD entails substantial overestimation. Contrast protocol trigger levels also affect BMD measurements. Adjusting for these factors is needed before contrast-enhanced images can be used clinically. Mini abstract: Osteoporosis is under-diagnosed. Contrast-enhanced CT made to examine other diseases might be utilized simultaneously for bone mineral density (BMD) screening. These scans, however, likely entails overestima-tion of BMD due to the effect of contrast. Adjusting for this effect is needed before contrast-enhanced images can be implemented clinically for BMD screening.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contrast enhanced CT-scans are not comparable to non-enhanced scans in emphysema quantification
    Heussel, C. P.
    Kappes, J.
    Hantusch, R.
    Hartlieb, S.
    Weinheimer, O.
    Kauczor, H. -U.
    Eberhardt, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 74 (03) : 473 - 478
  • [22] Machine Learning for Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis from CT Scans of the Wrist and Forearm
    Sebro, Ronnie
    De la Garza-Ramos, Cynthia
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [23] Estimates of volumetric bone mineral density from scans utilized by iDXA
    Liu, P.
    Shin, H.
    Crombie, A. P.
    Kelly, O. J.
    Ilich, J. Z.
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 82 : S171 - S171
  • [24] Comparison of volumetric and areal bone mineral density in CT and scout scans using spectral detector technology
    Johannes Hammel
    Lorenz Birnbacher
    Graeme Campbell
    Philippe Coulon
    Lev Ushakov
    Franz Pfeiffer
    Marcus R. Makowski
    Jan Kirschke
    Daniela Pfeiffer
    [J]. European Radiology Experimental, 7
  • [25] Comparison of volumetric and areal bone mineral density in CT and scout scans using spectral detector technology
    Hammel, Johannes
    Birnbacher, Lorenz
    Campbell, Graeme
    Coulon, Philippe
    Ushakov, Lev
    Pfeiffer, Franz
    Makowski, Marcus R. R.
    Kirschke, Jan
    Pfeiffer, Daniela
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [26] Quantitative computed tomography and opportunistic bone density screening by dual use of computed tomography scans
    Brett, Alan D.
    Brown, J. Keenan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2015, 3 (04) : 178 - 184
  • [27] How does it work? Bone mineral density scans
    Berger, A
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7362): : 484 - 484
  • [28] Direct Comparison of Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT for Opportunistic Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Implications for Osteoporosis Screening
    Ziemlewicz, Timothy J.
    Maciejewski, Alyssa
    Binkley, Neil
    Brett, Alan D.
    Brown, J. Keenan
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (04) : 694 - 698
  • [29] Bone mineral density measurements derived from dual-layer spectral CT enable opportunistic screening for osteoporosis
    Ferdinand Roski
    Johannes Hammel
    Kai Mei
    Thomas Baum
    Jan S. Kirschke
    Alexis Laugerette
    Felix K. Kopp
    Jannis Bodden
    Daniela Pfeiffer
    Franz Pfeiffer
    Ernst J. Rummeny
    Peter B. Noël
    Alexandra S. Gersing
    Benedikt J. Schwaiger
    [J]. European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 6355 - 6363
  • [30] Bone mineral density measurements derived from dual-layer spectral CT enable opportunistic screening for osteoporosis
    Roski, Ferdinand
    Hammel, Johannes
    Mei, Kai
    Baum, Thomas
    Kirschke, Jan S.
    Laugerette, Alexis
    Kopp, Felix K.
    Bodden, Jannis
    Pfeiffer, Daniela
    Pfeiffer, Franz
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Noel, Peter B.
    Gersing, Alexandra S.
    Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (11) : 6355 - 6363