A Radiostereometric Analysis of Tendon Migration After Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Interference Screw Versus Single Suture Anchor Fixation

被引:2
|
作者
Forsythe, Brian [1 ]
Patel, Harsh H. [1 ]
Berlinberg, Elyse J. [1 ]
Forlenza, Enrico M. [1 ,2 ]
Okoroha, Kelechi R. [1 ,3 ]
Williams, Brady T. [1 ,4 ]
Yanke, Adam B. [1 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Midwest Orthopaed Rush, 1611 W Harrison St,Suite 360, Chicago, IL 60621 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Mayo Clin Orthoped & Sports Med, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Med Campus, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2023年 / 51卷 / 11期
关键词
biceps tenodesis; interference screw; all-suture suture anchor; tendon migration; biceps tendon construct; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; LONG HEAD; OUTCOMES; REPAIR; TEARS;
D O I
10.1177/03635465231187030
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Studies suggest that similar clinical results are achieved via arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis (BT) techniques. Purpose: To quantify the postoperative migration of the BT construct between arthroscopic suprapectoral BT (ASPBT) and open subpectoral BT (OSPBT) techniques via interference screw (IS) or single-suture suture anchor (SSSA) fixation using radiostereometric analysis. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Distal migration of the biceps tendon after OSPBT with a polyetheretherketone IS, OSPBT with 1 SSSA, ASPBT with polyetheretherketone IS, and ASPBT with 2 SSSAs was measured prospectively. Patients with symptomatic biceps tendinopathy and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Constant-Murley subjective, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity scores were included. A tantalum bead was sutured on the proximal end of the long head of the biceps tendon before fixation of tendon tissue. Anteroposterior radiographs were performed immediately postoperatively, at 1 week, and at 3 months. Bead migration was measured, and preoperative PROMs were compared with those at latest follow-up. Results: Of 115 patients, 94 (82%) were available for final follow-up. IS fixation yielded the least tendon migration with no difference between the open and arthroscopic approaches (4.31 vs 5.04 mm; P = .70). Fixation with 1 suture anchor demonstrated significantly greater migration than that achieved with an IS at both 1 week (6.47 vs 0.1 mm, 6.47 vs 1.75 mm, P < .001;) and 3 months (14.76 vs 4.31 mm, 14.76 vs 5.04 mm, P < .001) postoperatively. Two-suture anchor fixation yielded significantly greater migration than IS fixation at 1 week (7.02 vs 0.1 mm, P < .001; 7.02 vs 1.75 mm, P = .003) but not 3 months postoperatively (8.06 vs 4.31 mm, P = .10; 8.06 vs 5.04 mm, P = .07). Four patients with suture anchor fixation (3 patients in the OSPBT 1 SSSA group, 9.4%, and 1 patient in the ASPBT 2 SSSAs group, 3.8%) developed a Popeye deformity, whereas no Popeye deformities occurred in the IS groups. Mean 3-month bead migration in patients with and without a Popeye deformity was 60.8 and 11.2 mm, respectively (P < .0001). PROMs did not differ among groups at final follow-up. Conclusion: Interference screw fixation yielded the least tendon migration whether achieved arthroscopically or open. The available data indicated that fixation with 1 SSSA but not 2 SSSAs resulted in significantly greater migration than that achieved with an IS. Despite variations in tendon migration, PROMs were similar among all groups. When SSSAs are used, tendon migration may be minimized by using & GE;2 anchors.
引用
收藏
页码:2869 / 2880
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [21] Outcomes of distal biceps tendon reattachment using the ToggleLoc™ fixation device with ZipLoop™ technology with single mini-open technique
    Florie Alech-Tournier
    Kamil Elkholti
    Vincent Locquet
    Michel Ninou
    Nicolas Gibert
    Marc Pozzetto
    Frédéric Breden
    Pascal Rostoucher
    Antoine Marc
    Lionel Erhard
    Jérôme Vogels
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2019, 29 : 925 - 931
  • [22] Outcomes of distal biceps tendon reattachment using the ToggleLoc™ fixation device with ZipLoop™ technology with single mini-open technique
    Alech-Tournier, Florie
    Elkholti, Kamil
    Locquet, Vincent
    Ninou, Michel
    Gibert, Nicolas
    Pozzetto, Marc
    Breden, Frederic
    Rostoucher, Pascal
    Marc, Antoine
    Erhard, Lionel
    Vogels, Jerome
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (04): : 925 - 931
  • [23] Interference screw versus suture button fixation for tibialis anterior tendon transfer: a biomechanical analysis
    Meyer, Zachary
    Bohl, Daniel
    Zide, Jacob
    Pierce, William
    Niese, Brad
    Shivers, Claire
    Polk, Jordan
    Kannan, Yassine
    Riccio, Anthony I.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2024, 33 (05): : 503 - 506
  • [24] Editorial Commentary: Size Matters: Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture-Anchor Fixation Compared to Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis
    Taylor, Samuel A.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (06): : 1769 - 1770
  • [25] Bone tunnel fixation versus suture anchor: Mid- and long-term results after distal biceps tendon rupture
    Stuby, F. M.
    Langenbeck, J. E.
    Eingartner, C.
    Weise, K.
    Rolauffs, B.
    SPORTVERLETZUNG-SPORTSCHADEN, 2007, 21 (02) : 88 - 92
  • [26] Bone tunnel fixation versus suture anchor: Mid- and long-term results after distal biceps tendon rupture
    Stuby, F. M.
    Langenbeck, J. E.
    Eingartner, C.
    Weise, K.
    Rolauffs, B.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2007, 145 (02): : 181 - 185
  • [27] Comparison of mini-open versus all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: retrospective analysis of a single center
    Karakoc, Yaman
    Atalay, Ismail Burak
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 37 : 1 - 7
  • [28] Clinical outcome and tendon integrity of arthroscopic versus mini-open supraspinatus tendon repair: A magnetic resonance imaging-controlled matched-pair analysis
    Liem, Dennis
    Bartl, Christoph
    Lichtenberg, Sven
    Magosch, Petra
    Habermeyer, Peter
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (05): : 514 - 521
  • [29] Repair of distal biceps tendon acute ruptures with two suture anchors and anterior mini-open single incision technique: clinical follow-up and isokinetic evaluation
    Gasparella A.
    Katusic D.
    Perissinotto A.
    Miti A.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2015, 99 (1) : 19 - 25
  • [30] The Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation Versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Feng
    Li, Xin-Xin
    Liu, Lei
    Xie, Zhi-Yang
    Xu, Yu-Zhu
    Ren, Guan-Rui
    Wu, Xiao-Tao
    Wang, Yun-Tao
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 164 : 310 - 322