Optimal allocation of nature-based solutions to achieve climate mitigation and adaptation goals

被引:1
|
作者
Villarreal-Rosas, Jaramar [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Rhodes, Jonathan R. [1 ,2 ]
Sonter, Laura J. [1 ,2 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [2 ,3 ]
Vogl, Adrian L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[4] Stanford Univ, Nat Capital Project, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
carbon sequestration; disaggregation of beneficiaries; ecosystem services; Nepal; sediment retention; spatial prioritization; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; TRADE-OFFS; CARBON; SYNERGIES;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10481
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Nature -based solutions (NbS) can prevent further climate change and increase local communities' capacity to adapt to the current impacts of climate change. However, the benefits obtained from implementing NbS are not distributed equally across people. Thus, it is key to further understand how people are im- pacted when implementing NbS.2. We developed a multi-objective prioritization approach to identify changes in (i) the biophysical provision of ecosystem services, (ii) optimal allocation of NbS and (iii) monetary benefits when targeting climate mitigation versus climate adapta- tion goals. We used the increase in metric tons of carbon storage as representa- tive of climate mitigation and the decrease in on -site and downstream tons of sediment per year as representative of climate adaptation.3. Planning strategies that target climate mitigation or climate adaptation goals sep- arately represent a loss of between 30% and 60% of the maximum possible car- bon sequestration or sediment retention benefits. Conversely, targeting climate mitigation and climate adaptation goals at the same time captured more than 90% of the maximum possible benefits for all objectives.4. Priority NbS in the mitigation planning strategy included soil and water conserva- tion and forest rehabilitation, while priority NbS in the adaptation planning strat- egy included grassland rehabilitation and hill terrace improvement.5. Targeting mitigation and adaptation goals at the same time captures 35M USD (89% of the maximum attainable) in value of carbon restored and retained, and 2M USD (100% of the maximum attainable) of avoided maintenance costs to the KGA hydropower plant. Conversely, failing to incorporate adaptation goals when developing climate plans only captures 1M of avoided maintenance costs to the KGA hydropower plant.6. Our approach can be replicated in other locations to promote cost-effective in- vestments in NbS able to secure both global and local benefits to people. This can improve the outcomes of international climate change financial schemes like the Green Climate Fund and the UN- REDD+ program.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1045
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Setting the stage for decision-making on nature-based solutions for coastal climate adaptation
    Geukes, Haye H.
    van Bodegom, Peter M.
    van Oudenhoven, Alexander P. E.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 247
  • [32] Nature-Based Solutions as a Tool in the New Circular Economic Model for Climate Change Adaptation
    Stefanakis A.I.
    Calheiros C.S.C.
    Nikolaou I.
    Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2021, 1 (1): : 303 - 318
  • [33] Public support for urban climate adaptation policy through nature-based solutions in Prague
    Badura, Tomas
    Lorencova, Eliska Krkoska
    Ferrini, Silvia
    Vackarova, Davina
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2021, 215
  • [34] Towards urban transition: implementing nature-based solutions and renewable energies to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
    Di Cosola, Valentina Oquendo
    Olivieri, Francesca
    Olivieri, Lorenzo
    Sanchez-Resendiz, Jorge Adan
    TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, : 102 - 105
  • [35] Selection, Planning, and Modelling of Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation
    Griffiths, James
    Borne, Karine E.
    Semadeni-Davies, Annette
    Tanner, Chris C.
    WATER, 2024, 16 (19)
  • [36] Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation: The Case Study of Kochi
    Aloscious, Arun Antony
    Artuso, Mario
    Torabi Moghadam, Sara
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [37] Mainstream Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Climate Resilience
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    McPhearson, Timon
    BIOSCIENCE, 2022, 72 (02) : 113 - 115
  • [38] Nature-based solutions are essential for climate and health action
    Vora, Neil M.
    Narayan, Shweta
    Aluso, Aggrey
    Donatti, Camila, I
    El Omrani, Omnia
    Hannah, Lee
    Mahmood, Jemilah
    Ndembi, Nicaise
    Vale, Mariana M.
    Willetts, Elizabeth
    LANCET, 2024, 404 (10456): : 913 - 915
  • [39] Review: biological engineering for nature-based climate solutions
    Benjamin R. K. Runkle
    Journal of Biological Engineering, 16
  • [40] Nature-based climate solutions: align policy with science
    Trevor F. Keenan
    Kimberly A. Novick
    William R. L. Anderegg
    Caroline P. Normile
    Nature, 2023, 624 : 42 - 42