Optimal allocation of nature-based solutions to achieve climate mitigation and adaptation goals

被引:1
|
作者
Villarreal-Rosas, Jaramar [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Rhodes, Jonathan R. [1 ,2 ]
Sonter, Laura J. [1 ,2 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [2 ,3 ]
Vogl, Adrian L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[4] Stanford Univ, Nat Capital Project, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
carbon sequestration; disaggregation of beneficiaries; ecosystem services; Nepal; sediment retention; spatial prioritization; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; TRADE-OFFS; CARBON; SYNERGIES;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10481
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Nature -based solutions (NbS) can prevent further climate change and increase local communities' capacity to adapt to the current impacts of climate change. However, the benefits obtained from implementing NbS are not distributed equally across people. Thus, it is key to further understand how people are im- pacted when implementing NbS.2. We developed a multi-objective prioritization approach to identify changes in (i) the biophysical provision of ecosystem services, (ii) optimal allocation of NbS and (iii) monetary benefits when targeting climate mitigation versus climate adapta- tion goals. We used the increase in metric tons of carbon storage as representa- tive of climate mitigation and the decrease in on -site and downstream tons of sediment per year as representative of climate adaptation.3. Planning strategies that target climate mitigation or climate adaptation goals sep- arately represent a loss of between 30% and 60% of the maximum possible car- bon sequestration or sediment retention benefits. Conversely, targeting climate mitigation and climate adaptation goals at the same time captured more than 90% of the maximum possible benefits for all objectives.4. Priority NbS in the mitigation planning strategy included soil and water conserva- tion and forest rehabilitation, while priority NbS in the adaptation planning strat- egy included grassland rehabilitation and hill terrace improvement.5. Targeting mitigation and adaptation goals at the same time captures 35M USD (89% of the maximum attainable) in value of carbon restored and retained, and 2M USD (100% of the maximum attainable) of avoided maintenance costs to the KGA hydropower plant. Conversely, failing to incorporate adaptation goals when developing climate plans only captures 1M of avoided maintenance costs to the KGA hydropower plant.6. Our approach can be replicated in other locations to promote cost-effective in- vestments in NbS able to secure both global and local benefits to people. This can improve the outcomes of international climate change financial schemes like the Green Climate Fund and the UN- REDD+ program.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1045
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting
    Keith, Heather
    Vardon, Michael
    Obst, Carl
    Young, Virginia
    Houghton, Richard A.
    Mackey, Brendan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 769
  • [22] Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action
    Kabisch, Nadja
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Pauleit, Stephan
    Naumann, Sandra
    Davis, McKenna
    Artmann, Martina
    Haase, Dagmar
    Knapp, Sonja
    Korn, Horst
    Stadler, Jutta
    Zaunberger, Karin
    Bonn, Aletta
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (02):
  • [23] The Potential of Peatlands as Nature-Based Climate Solutions
    Maria Strack
    Scott J. Davidson
    Takashi Hirano
    Christian Dunn
    Current Climate Change Reports, 2022, 8 : 71 - 82
  • [24] Nature-Based Solutions for the Mitigation of Persistent and Emerging Contaminants
    Carvalho, Pedro N.
    Matamoros, Victor
    WATER, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [25] The Potential of Peatlands as Nature-Based Climate Solutions
    Strack, Maria
    Davidson, Scott J.
    Hirano, Takashi
    Dunn, Christian
    CURRENT CLIMATE CHANGE REPORTS, 2022, 8 (03) : 71 - 82
  • [26] Framing "nature-based" solutions to climate change
    Osaka, Shannon
    Bellamy, Rob
    Castree, Noel
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 12 (05)
  • [27] Editorial: Urban nature-based solutions and green infrastructure as strategies for climate change adaptation
    Matos, Cristina
    Monteiro, Cristina M.
    Santos, Cristina
    Briga-Sa, Ana
    Imteaz, Monzur Alam
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [28] A relational turn in climate change adaptation: Evidence from urban nature-based solutions
    Goodwin, Sean
    Olazabal, Marta
    Castro, Antonio J.
    Pascual, Unai
    AMBIO, 2025, 54 (03) : 520 - 535
  • [29] Nature-based solutions in spatial planning and policies for climate change adaptation: A literature review
    Corgo, Joao
    Cruz, Sara Santos
    Conceicao, Paulo
    AMBIO, 2024, 53 (11) : 1599 - 1617
  • [30] Biodiversity outcomes of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation: Characterising the evidence base
    Key, Isabel B.
    Smith, Alison C.
    Turner, Beth
    Chausson, Alexandre
    Girardin, Cecile A. J.
    Macgillivray, Megan
    Seddon, Nathalie
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10