FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION

被引:1
|
作者
Arzu, Ufuk [1 ]
Ersin, Mehmet [2 ]
Chodza, Mehmet [1 ]
Sahin, Koray [3 ]
Kilicoglu, Onder [4 ]
Ersen, Ali [5 ]
机构
[1] VKV Amer Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Haseki Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Koc Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Istanbul Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Shoulder joint; Surgical procedures; operative; Bio-mechanical phenomena; ANTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITY; SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE; PATTE PROCEDURE; BRISTOW; COMPLICATIONS; STABILITY; STABILIZATION;
D O I
10.1590/1413-785220233102e260966
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Latarjet procedure is often preferred in recurrent shoulder dislocations accompanied by glenoid bone loss. It is observed that the superiority of bone graft fixation methods is still controversial. The aim of this study is to biomechanically compare the bone graft fixation methods in the Latarjet procedure. Methods: 15 third- generation scapula bone models were divided into 3 groups. Graft was fixated in the first group with fully-threaded cortical screws of 3.5mm diameter, in the second group two 16 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws of 4.5mm diameter, and in the third group via a mini plate and screw. The hemispherical humeral head was placed on the tip of the cyclic charge device, and thus, the charge applied to the coracoid graft was homogeneous. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between paired comparisons (p>0.05). The forces in 5 mm displacement in total vary between 502-857N. Total stiffness measurements ranged between 105 and 625; the mean value was 258.13 +/- 53.54 with no statistically significant difference by groups (p = 0.958). Conclusion: This biomechanical study showed that there is no difference between three coracoid fixation options in terms of fixation strength. Unlike previous assumptions, plate fixation is not biomechanically superior to screw fixation. Surgeons should consider their personal preferences and experience in choosing fixation methods.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intramedullary rod fixation compared with blade-plate-and-screw fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: A biomechanical investigation
    Chiodo, CP
    Acevedo, JI
    Sammarco, VJ
    Parks, BG
    Boucher, HR
    Myerson, MS
    Schon, LC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (12): : 2425 - 2428
  • [42] Biomechanical comparison of occipitoatlantal screw fixation techniques -: Laboratory investigation
    Bambakidis, Nicholas C.
    Feiz-Erfan, Iman
    Horn, Eric M.
    Gonzalez, L. Fernando
    Baek, Seungwon
    Yueksel, K. Zafer
    Brantley, Anna G. U.
    Sonntag, Volker K. H.
    Crawford, Neil R.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 8 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [43] Biceps Tenodesis With Interference Screw Fixation: A Biomechanical Comparison of Screw Length and Diameter
    Slabaugh, Maj Mark A.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    Van Thiel, Geoffrey S.
    Bell, Rebecca M.
    Wang, Vincent M.
    Trenhaile, Scott
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (02): : 161 - 166
  • [44] Biomechanical comparison of plate-screw and screw fixation in medial tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker 4). A model study
    Cift, H.
    Cetik, O.
    Kalaycioglu, B.
    Dirikoglu, M. H.
    Ozkan, K.
    Eksioglu, F.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2010, 96 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [45] Biomechanical comparison of screw versus screw-plate fixation of type 2 Schatzker fractures of the lateral tibial plateau
    Boisrenoult, P
    Bricteux, S
    Beaufils, P
    Hardy, P
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2000, 86 (07): : 707 - 711
  • [46] Anterior occiput to axis screw fixation - Part II: A biomechanical comparison with posterior fixation techniques
    Dvorak, MFS
    Sekeramayi, F
    Zhu, QG
    Hoekema, J
    Fisher, C
    Boyd, M
    Goertzen, DJ
    Oxland, TR
    SPINE, 2003, 28 (03) : 239 - 245
  • [47] PRINCIPLES OF SCREW AND PLATE FIXATION
    BOUDRIEAU, RJ
    SEMINARS IN VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SURGERY-SMALL ANIMAL, 1991, 6 (01): : 75 - 89
  • [48] Anterior atlanto-occipital transarticular screw fixation: a biomechanical comparison with posterior fixation techniques
    Xu, Panjie
    Huang, Zhiping
    Xiao, Hang
    Lin, Junyu
    Zhu, Qingan
    Ji, Wei
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 38 (03) : 366 - 371
  • [49] A biomechanical cadaver comparison of suture button fixation to plate fixation for pubic symphysis diastasis
    Kiskaddon, Eric M.
    Wright, Amanda
    Meeks, Brett D.
    Froehle, Andrew W.
    Gould, Greg C.
    Lubitz, Marc G.
    Prayson, Michael J.
    Horne, Brandon R.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2018, 49 (11): : 1993 - 1998
  • [50] Mechanical Comparison of Headless Screw Fixation and Locking Plate Fixation for Talar Neck Fractures
    Karakasli, Ahmet
    Hapa, Onur
    Erduran, Mehmet
    Dincer, Cemal
    Cecen, Berivan
    Havitcioglu, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2015, 54 (05): : 905 - 909