FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION

被引:1
|
作者
Arzu, Ufuk [1 ]
Ersin, Mehmet [2 ]
Chodza, Mehmet [1 ]
Sahin, Koray [3 ]
Kilicoglu, Onder [4 ]
Ersen, Ali [5 ]
机构
[1] VKV Amer Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Haseki Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Koc Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Istanbul Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Shoulder joint; Surgical procedures; operative; Bio-mechanical phenomena; ANTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITY; SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE; PATTE PROCEDURE; BRISTOW; COMPLICATIONS; STABILITY; STABILIZATION;
D O I
10.1590/1413-785220233102e260966
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Latarjet procedure is often preferred in recurrent shoulder dislocations accompanied by glenoid bone loss. It is observed that the superiority of bone graft fixation methods is still controversial. The aim of this study is to biomechanically compare the bone graft fixation methods in the Latarjet procedure. Methods: 15 third- generation scapula bone models were divided into 3 groups. Graft was fixated in the first group with fully-threaded cortical screws of 3.5mm diameter, in the second group two 16 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws of 4.5mm diameter, and in the third group via a mini plate and screw. The hemispherical humeral head was placed on the tip of the cyclic charge device, and thus, the charge applied to the coracoid graft was homogeneous. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between paired comparisons (p>0.05). The forces in 5 mm displacement in total vary between 502-857N. Total stiffness measurements ranged between 105 and 625; the mean value was 258.13 +/- 53.54 with no statistically significant difference by groups (p = 0.958). Conclusion: This biomechanical study showed that there is no difference between three coracoid fixation options in terms of fixation strength. Unlike previous assumptions, plate fixation is not biomechanically superior to screw fixation. Surgeons should consider their personal preferences and experience in choosing fixation methods.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] External Ring Fixation Versus Screw Fixation for Ankle Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Comparison
    Ogut, Tahir
    Glisson, Richard R.
    Chuckpaiwong, Bavornrit
    Le, Ian L. D.
    Easley, Mark E.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 30 (04) : 353 - 360
  • [22] A biomechanical comparison between cortical bone trajectory fixation and pedicle screw fixation
    Oshino, Hiroki
    Sakakibara, Toshihiko
    Inaba, Tadashi
    Yoshikawa, Takamasa
    Kato, Takaya
    Kasai, Yuichi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
  • [23] A biomechanical comparison between cortical bone trajectory fixation and pedicle screw fixation
    Hiroki Oshino
    Toshihiko Sakakibara
    Tadashi Inaba
    Takamasa Yoshikawa
    Takaya Kato
    Yuichi Kasai
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10
  • [24] Comparison of the biomechanical stability of cannulated screw and reconstruction plate for the fixation of symphysis pubis diastasis
    Yu, Ke-He
    Hong, Jian-Jun
    Chen, Lin-Wei
    Guo, Xiao-Shan
    Yiyong Shengwu Lixue/Journal of Medical Biomechanics, 2010, 25 (06): : 475 - 478
  • [25] Biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and a novel pedicle screw external fixation to repair equine mandibular fractures
    Monck, Samantha L.
    McGilvray, Kirk C.
    Easley, Jeremiah T.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2020, 49 (05) : 997 - 1006
  • [26] Ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: A biomechanical comparison of dorsal plate and transarticular screw fixation
    Alberta, FG
    Aronow, MS
    Barrero, M
    Diaz-Doran, V
    Sullivan, RJ
    Adams, DJ
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 26 (06) : 462 - 473
  • [27] Biomechanical Effects of Screw Fixation in Second Mandibular Reconstruction Plate
    Chang, Ya-Wen
    Liu, Pao-Hsin
    2013 35TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2013, : 3167 - 3170
  • [28] A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Types of Lumbopelvic Fixation
    Tis, John E.
    Helgeson, Melvin
    Lehman, Ronald A.
    Dmitriev, Anton E.
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (24) : E866 - E872
  • [29] Biomechanical Strength of Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation in the Latarjet Procedure: A Cadaver Study
    Hakverdiyev, Yasin
    Mcfarland, Edward G.
    Kaymakoglu, Mehmet
    Ozdemir, Erdi
    Akpinar, Sercan
    Huri, Pinar
    Costouros, John G.
    Huri, Gazi
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 45 (06) : E321 - E325
  • [30] Biomechanical comparison of sacral and transarticular sacroiliac screw fixation
    Fradet, Leo
    Bianco, Rohan-Jean
    Tatsumi, Robert
    Coleman, John
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2020, 8 (05) : 853 - 862