FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION

被引:1
|
作者
Arzu, Ufuk [1 ]
Ersin, Mehmet [2 ]
Chodza, Mehmet [1 ]
Sahin, Koray [3 ]
Kilicoglu, Onder [4 ]
Ersen, Ali [5 ]
机构
[1] VKV Amer Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Haseki Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Koc Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Istanbul Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Shoulder joint; Surgical procedures; operative; Bio-mechanical phenomena; ANTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITY; SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE; PATTE PROCEDURE; BRISTOW; COMPLICATIONS; STABILITY; STABILIZATION;
D O I
10.1590/1413-785220233102e260966
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Latarjet procedure is often preferred in recurrent shoulder dislocations accompanied by glenoid bone loss. It is observed that the superiority of bone graft fixation methods is still controversial. The aim of this study is to biomechanically compare the bone graft fixation methods in the Latarjet procedure. Methods: 15 third- generation scapula bone models were divided into 3 groups. Graft was fixated in the first group with fully-threaded cortical screws of 3.5mm diameter, in the second group two 16 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws of 4.5mm diameter, and in the third group via a mini plate and screw. The hemispherical humeral head was placed on the tip of the cyclic charge device, and thus, the charge applied to the coracoid graft was homogeneous. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between paired comparisons (p>0.05). The forces in 5 mm displacement in total vary between 502-857N. Total stiffness measurements ranged between 105 and 625; the mean value was 258.13 +/- 53.54 with no statistically significant difference by groups (p = 0.958). Conclusion: This biomechanical study showed that there is no difference between three coracoid fixation options in terms of fixation strength. Unlike previous assumptions, plate fixation is not biomechanically superior to screw fixation. Surgeons should consider their personal preferences and experience in choosing fixation methods.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical Analysis of Latarjet Screw Fixation: Comparison of Screw Types and Fixation Methods
    Shin, Jason J.
    Hamamoto, Jason T.
    Leroux, Timothy S.
    Saccomanno, Maristella F.
    Jain, Akshay
    Khair, Mahmoud M.
    Mellano, Christen R.
    Shewman, Elizabeth F.
    Nicholson, Gregory P.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (09): : 1646 - 1653
  • [2] Biomechanical Comparison of Odontoid Plate Fixation Versus Odontoid Screw Fixation
    Platzer, Patrick
    Eipeldauer, Stefan
    Leitgeb, Johannes
    Aldrian, Silke
    Vecsei, Vilmos
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (03): : 164 - 169
  • [3] Cortical suture button fixation vs. bicortical screw fixation in the Latarjet procedure: a biomechanical comparison
    Williams, Robert C.
    Morris, Randal P.
    El Beaino, Marc
    Maassen, Nicholas H.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (07) : 1470 - 1478
  • [4] Latarjet Fixation: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study Evaluating Cortical and Cannulated Screw Fixation
    Alvi, Hasham M.
    Monroe, Emily J.
    Muriuki, Muturi
    Verma, Rajat N.
    Marra, Guido
    Saltzman, Matthew D.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (04)
  • [5] Biomechanical Analysis of Plate Fixation Compared With Various Screw Configurations for Use in the Latarjet Procedure
    Frank, Rachel M.
    Roth, Martina
    Wijdicks, Coen Abel
    Fischer, Nicole
    Costantini, Alberto
    Di Giacomo, Giovanni
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (07)
  • [6] Biomechanical comparison between various screw fixation angles for Latarjet procedure: a cadaveric biomechanical study
    Hsu, Kai-Lan
    Yeh, Ming-Long
    Kuan, Fa-Chuan
    Hong, Chih-Kai
    Chuang, Hao-Chun
    Wang, Wei-Ming
    Su, Wei-Ren
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (09) : 1947 - 1956
  • [7] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar screw-plate fixation versus posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation
    Liu, Lie-hua
    Guo, Cong-tao
    Zhou, Qiang
    Pu, Xiao-bing
    Song, Lei
    Wang, Hao-ming
    Zhao, Chen
    Cheng, Shi-ming
    Lan, Yang-jun
    Liu, Ling
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 34 (06) : 907 - 911
  • [8] Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Lumbar Screw-plate Fixation versus Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation
    刘列华
    郭从涛
    周强
    蒲小兵
    宋磊
    王浩明
    赵晨
    成仕明
    兰阳军
    刘岭
    Current Medical Science, 2014, 34 (06) : 907 - 911
  • [9] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar screw-plate fixation versus posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation
    Lie-hua Liu
    Cong-tao Guo
    Qiang Zhou
    Xiao-bing Pu
    Lei Song
    Hao-ming Wang
    Chen Zhao
    Shi-ming Cheng
    Yang-jun Lan
    Ling Liu
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2014, 34 : 907 - 911
  • [10] EXPERIMENTAL SPIRAL FRACTURES - AN INVITRO BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF LAG-SCREW FIXATION TO PLATE FIXATION
    COX, LG
    DAHNERS, LE
    GILBERT, JA
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1989, (243) : 189 - 194