Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in the characterization of Palpable breast lesions: A prospective observational study

被引:1
|
作者
Boruah, Deb K. [1 ]
Konwar, Nitashree [2 ]
Gogoi, Bidyut B. [3 ]
Hazarika, Karuna [2 ]
Ahmed, Halimuddin [2 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Gauhati 781101, Assam, India
[2] Tezpur Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Radiodiag, Tezpur 784010, Assam, India
[3] Assam Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Pathol, Barbari 786002, Assam, India
来源
关键词
DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging); DCE-MRI (dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging); Kinetic curve; Breast carcinoma; BI-RADS; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-023-01002-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundBreast MRI is the imaging modality of choice in patients with palpable breast lesions unequivocal on mammography and ultrasonography. This study aims to evaluate the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in the characterization and differentiation of various palpable breast lesions. This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital between July 2019 and June 2021. Sixty-six patients with palpable breast lesions were undergone MRI scans of the breasts. The various palpable breast lesions were categorized according to the 5th edition BI-RADS lexicon. The sensitivity of ADC mapping and DCE-MRI was determined for differentiation of various palpable breast lesions according to the BI-RADS category and gold standard histopathological findings.ResultsOf 66 patients with palpable breast lesions, 36 patients (54.5%) were benign and 30 patients (45.5%) were malignant lesions. Malignant palpable breast lesions had a mean ADC value of 0.939 +/- 0.166[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and benign lesions had 1.891 +/- 0.524[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s where unpaired Student t-test showed statistically significant difference of P value 0.0005. BI-RADS 2 lesions had a mean ADC value of 2.056 +/- 0.471[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, BI-RADS 3 had 1.314 +/- 0.151[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, BI-RADS 4 had 0.935 +/- 0.119[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and BI-RADS 5 had 0.930 +/- 0.943[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. BI-RADS 2 category showed optimal cutoff mean ADC of 1.508 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 94.7%, BI-RADS 3 lesions had 1.208 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 55.2%, BI-RADS 4 lesions had 1.064 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity 80% and specificity of 67.9%, and BI-RADS 5 lesions had 1.013 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 82.6%.ConclusionsBreast MRI is superior to the other imaging modalities for the characterization and differentiation of various palpable breast lesions. The combined use of ADC mapping and DCE-MRI had more sensitivity than conventional MRI, ADC mapping or DCE-MRI alone.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions
    Heinisch, M
    Gallowitsch, HJ
    Mikosch, P
    Kresnik, E
    Kumnig, G
    Gomez, I
    Lind, P
    Umschaden, HW
    Gasser, J
    Forsthuber, EP
    BREAST, 2003, 12 (01): : 17 - 22
  • [42] Imaging Features and Management of High-Risk Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Dynamic Breast MRI
    Heller, Samantha L.
    Moy, Linda
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (02) : 249 - 255
  • [43] Computerized breast lesions detection using kinetic and morphologic analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Chang, Yeun-Chung
    Huang, Yan-Hao
    Huang, Chiun-Sheng
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Chang, Ruey-Feng
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (05) : 514 - 522
  • [44] Decision Making for Breast Lesions Initially Detected at Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Schacht, David
    Sennett, Charlene A.
    Newstead, Gillian M.
    Imaizumi, Takeshi
    Irie, Hiroyuki
    Abe, Hiroyuki
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (06) : 1376 - 1385
  • [45] Diagnostic potential of ultrafast contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast in hypervascularized lesions: Are there advantages in comparison with standard dynamic MRI?
    Schorn, C
    Fischer, U
    Luftner-Nagel, S
    Grabbe, E
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (01) : 118 - 122
  • [46] Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast: How Is It Used?
    Kataoka, Masako
    Honda, Maya
    Ohashi, Akane
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Mori, Naoko
    Goto, Mariko
    Fujioka, Tomoyuki
    Mori, Mio
    Kato, Yutaka
    Satake, Hiroko
    Iima, Mami
    Kubota, Kazunori
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 21 (01) : 83 - 94
  • [47] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer
    Turnbull, Lindsay W.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2009, 22 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [48] Detecting Invasive Breast Carcinoma on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Moroianu, Stefania L.
    Rusu, Mirabela
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2021: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2021, 11597
  • [49] Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors
    Li, Ting
    Yu, Tao
    Li, Lyu
    Lu, Lunbo
    Zhuo, Yaoyao
    Lian, Jingge
    Xiong, Yun
    Kong, Dexing
    Li, Kangan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 48 (05) : 1358 - 1366
  • [50] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma: Correlation with Detailed Histologic Features and the Enhancement Ratio on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images
    Matsubayashi, Roka Namoto
    Fujii, Teruhiko
    Yasumori, Kotaro
    Muranaka, Toru
    Momosaki, Seiya
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 2010