Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in the characterization of Palpable breast lesions: A prospective observational study

被引:1
|
作者
Boruah, Deb K. [1 ]
Konwar, Nitashree [2 ]
Gogoi, Bidyut B. [3 ]
Hazarika, Karuna [2 ]
Ahmed, Halimuddin [2 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Gauhati 781101, Assam, India
[2] Tezpur Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Radiodiag, Tezpur 784010, Assam, India
[3] Assam Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Pathol, Barbari 786002, Assam, India
来源
关键词
DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging); DCE-MRI (dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging); Kinetic curve; Breast carcinoma; BI-RADS; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-023-01002-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundBreast MRI is the imaging modality of choice in patients with palpable breast lesions unequivocal on mammography and ultrasonography. This study aims to evaluate the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in the characterization and differentiation of various palpable breast lesions. This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital between July 2019 and June 2021. Sixty-six patients with palpable breast lesions were undergone MRI scans of the breasts. The various palpable breast lesions were categorized according to the 5th edition BI-RADS lexicon. The sensitivity of ADC mapping and DCE-MRI was determined for differentiation of various palpable breast lesions according to the BI-RADS category and gold standard histopathological findings.ResultsOf 66 patients with palpable breast lesions, 36 patients (54.5%) were benign and 30 patients (45.5%) were malignant lesions. Malignant palpable breast lesions had a mean ADC value of 0.939 +/- 0.166[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and benign lesions had 1.891 +/- 0.524[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s where unpaired Student t-test showed statistically significant difference of P value 0.0005. BI-RADS 2 lesions had a mean ADC value of 2.056 +/- 0.471[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, BI-RADS 3 had 1.314 +/- 0.151[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, BI-RADS 4 had 0.935 +/- 0.119[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and BI-RADS 5 had 0.930 +/- 0.943[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. BI-RADS 2 category showed optimal cutoff mean ADC of 1.508 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 94.7%, BI-RADS 3 lesions had 1.208 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 55.2%, BI-RADS 4 lesions had 1.064 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity 80% and specificity of 67.9%, and BI-RADS 5 lesions had 1.013 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 82.6%.ConclusionsBreast MRI is superior to the other imaging modalities for the characterization and differentiation of various palpable breast lesions. The combined use of ADC mapping and DCE-MRI had more sensitivity than conventional MRI, ADC mapping or DCE-MRI alone.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0T: a pilot study
    Harms, S. E.
    BREAST DISEASES, 2016, 27 (01): : 43 - 44
  • [32] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0T: a pilot study
    Pineda, F. D.
    Medved, M.
    Fan, X.
    Ivancevic, M. K.
    Abe, H.
    Shimauchi, A.
    Newstead, G. M.
    Karczmar, G. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1049):
  • [33] The utility of diffusion weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient in characterization of breast masses
    Wahab, Moustafa A. Kader A.
    Kareem, Hoda Abdel
    Hassan, Ebtesam Esmail
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 46 (04): : 1257 - 1265
  • [34] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a case series
    Pi-Yi Huang
    Meng-Yuan Tsai
    Jer-Shyung Huang
    Pei-Ying Lin
    Chen-Pin Chou
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2023, 50 : 521 - 529
  • [35] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a case series
    Huang, Pi-Yi
    Tsai, Meng-Yuan
    Huang, Jer-Shyung
    Lin, Pei-Ying
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS, 2023, 50 (04) : 521 - 529
  • [36] Feasibility study of dual parametric 2D histogram analysis of breast lesions with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI
    Chen, Yanqiong
    Wu, Bin
    Liu, Hui
    Wang, Dan
    Gu, Yajia
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 16
  • [37] Feasibility study of dual parametric 2D histogram analysis of breast lesions with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI
    Yanqiong Chen
    Bin Wu
    Hui Liu
    Dan Wang
    Yajia Gu
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 16
  • [38] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Perfusion are Potential Predictors for Grading Meningiomas
    Utomo, Sri Andreani
    Bajamal, Abdul Hafid
    Yueniwati, Yuyun
    Sanjaya, Irfan Deny
    Fauziah, Dyah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 19 (09): : 1364 - 1376
  • [39] Diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions using an empirical mathematical model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Fan, Xiaobing
    Medved, Milica
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    Yang, Cheng
    Foxley, Sean
    Arkani, Sanaz
    Recant, Wendy
    Zamora, Marta A.
    Abe, Hiroyuki
    Newstead, Gillian M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 25 (05) : 593 - 603
  • [40] The Added Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI at 3.0 T in Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
    Merckel, Laura G.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Peters, Nicky H. G. M.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    Storm, Remmert K.
    Weits, Teun
    Duvivier, Katya M.
    van Dalen, Thijs
    Mali, Willem P. Th M.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):