Who to escalate during a pandemic? A retrospective observational study about decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK

被引:0
|
作者
Beresford, Stephanie [1 ]
Tandon, Aditi [1 ,2 ]
Farina, Sofia [1 ]
Johnston, Brian [1 ,3 ]
Crews, Maryam [1 ]
Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Crit Care, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Dept Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
COVID-19; critical care; frailty; clinical management;
D O I
10.1136/emermed-2022-212505
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundOptimal decision-making regarding who to admit to critical care in pandemic situations remains unclear. We compared age, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), 4C Mortality Score and hospital mortality in two separate COVID-19 surges based on the escalation decision made by the treating physician. MethodsA retrospective analysis of all referrals to critical care during the first COVID-19 surge (cohort 1, March/April 2020) and a late surge (cohort 2, October/November 2021) was undertaken. Patients with confirmed or high clinical suspicion of COVID-19 infection were included. A senior critical care physician assessed all patients regarding their suitability for potential intensive care unit admission. Demographics, CFS, 4C Mortality Score and hospital mortality were compared depending on the escalation decision made by the attending physician. Results203 patients were included in the study, 139 in cohort 1 and 64 in cohort 2. There were no significant differences in age, CFS and 4C scores between the two cohorts. Patients deemed suitable for escalation by clinicians were significantly younger with significantly lower CFS and 4C scores compared with patients who were not deemed to benefit from escalation. This pattern was observed in both cohorts. Mortality in patients not deemed suitable for escalation was 61.8% in cohort 1 and 47.4% in cohort 2 (p < 0.001). ConclusionsDecisions who to escalate to critical care in settings with limited resources pose moral distress on clinicians. 4C score, age and CFS did not change significantly between the two surges but differed significantly between patients deemed suitable for escalation and those deemed unsuitable by clinicians. Risk prediction tools may be useful in a pandemic to supplement clinical decision-making, even though escalation thresholds require adjustments to reflect changes in risk profile and outcomes between different pandemic surges.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Psychiatric liaison service referral patterns during the UK COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study
    Sampson, E. L.
    Wright, J.
    Dove, J.
    Mukadam, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 36 (01): : 35 - 42
  • [42] Epidemiological differences in maxillofacial trauma during COVID-19 pandemic: A descriptive retrospective observational study
    Soto, Felipe
    Cancino, Javiera
    Gutierrez, Sergio
    Oliver, Maria
    Cerda, Patricio
    Hernandez, Jose
    Gazitua, Gustavo
    Nuneza, Cristian
    REVISTA MEDICA CLINICA LAS CONDES, 2023, 34 (04): : 276 - 281
  • [43] Herpes zoster in children during the COVID-19 pandemic in France: A retrospective multicenter observational study
    Tabet, A.
    Mahe, E.
    Boralevi, F.
    Maruani, A.
    Hesse, S.
    Gentile, S.
    Mallet, S.
    ANNALES DE DERMATOLOGIE ET DE VENEREOLOGIE, 2023, 150 (01): : 46 - 48
  • [44] Observational studies of rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Polastri, Massimiliano
    Costi, Stefania
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 28 (05):
  • [45] Cancer Patients' Challenges During COVID-19 Pandemic: An Approach to Decision-Making in Management and Policy-Making
    Savabi-Esfahani, Mitra
    Zangeneh, Sanaz
    Sharbafchi, Mohammad Reza
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [46] QR codes and automated decision-making in the COVID-19 pandemic
    Goggin, Gerard
    Wilken, Rowan
    NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2024, 26 (03) : 1268 - 1289
  • [47] Concepts for good decision-making in the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile
    Canals L, Mauricio
    REVISTA CHILENA DE INFECTOLOGIA, 2020, 37 (02): : 170 - 172
  • [48] Managing appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK
    Scott, C.
    Lambert, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (08) : E271 - E271
  • [49] Government popularity in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Castro, Vitor
    Martins, Rodrigo
    ECONOMICS & POLITICS, 2024,
  • [50] Decision-Making in Sport During a Pandemic
    Hamilton, Bruce
    Burt, Peter
    Anderson, Lynley
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2021, 31 (06): : 516 - 521