Who to escalate during a pandemic? A retrospective observational study about decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK

被引:0
|
作者
Beresford, Stephanie [1 ]
Tandon, Aditi [1 ,2 ]
Farina, Sofia [1 ]
Johnston, Brian [1 ,3 ]
Crews, Maryam [1 ]
Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Crit Care, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Dept Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
COVID-19; critical care; frailty; clinical management;
D O I
10.1136/emermed-2022-212505
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundOptimal decision-making regarding who to admit to critical care in pandemic situations remains unclear. We compared age, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), 4C Mortality Score and hospital mortality in two separate COVID-19 surges based on the escalation decision made by the treating physician. MethodsA retrospective analysis of all referrals to critical care during the first COVID-19 surge (cohort 1, March/April 2020) and a late surge (cohort 2, October/November 2021) was undertaken. Patients with confirmed or high clinical suspicion of COVID-19 infection were included. A senior critical care physician assessed all patients regarding their suitability for potential intensive care unit admission. Demographics, CFS, 4C Mortality Score and hospital mortality were compared depending on the escalation decision made by the attending physician. Results203 patients were included in the study, 139 in cohort 1 and 64 in cohort 2. There were no significant differences in age, CFS and 4C scores between the two cohorts. Patients deemed suitable for escalation by clinicians were significantly younger with significantly lower CFS and 4C scores compared with patients who were not deemed to benefit from escalation. This pattern was observed in both cohorts. Mortality in patients not deemed suitable for escalation was 61.8% in cohort 1 and 47.4% in cohort 2 (p < 0.001). ConclusionsDecisions who to escalate to critical care in settings with limited resources pose moral distress on clinicians. 4C score, age and CFS did not change significantly between the two surges but differed significantly between patients deemed suitable for escalation and those deemed unsuitable by clinicians. Risk prediction tools may be useful in a pandemic to supplement clinical decision-making, even though escalation thresholds require adjustments to reflect changes in risk profile and outcomes between different pandemic surges.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surgical Precautions and Algorithmic Decision-Making for Surgical Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Yenigun, Alper
    Ozturan, Orhan
    Dagistanli, Nurtac
    Koc, Meliha Meric
    Koytak, Arif
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (06) : 787 - 789
  • [22] Governance and Public Health Decision-Making During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review
    Asthana, Sumegha
    Mukherjee, Sanjana
    Phelan, Alexandra L.
    Standley, Claire J.
    PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS, 2024, 45
  • [23] Cancer Treatment Decision-Making During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Data Over Opinion
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (02): : 338 - 339
  • [24] Patient Satisfaction and Trust in Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study
    Orrange, Sharon
    Patel, Arpna
    Mack, Wendy Jean
    Cassetta, Julia
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2021, 8 (02):
  • [25] Safety of bedside surgical tracheostomy during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective observational study
    Picetti, Edoardo
    Fornaciari, Anna
    Taccone, Fabio Silvio
    Malchiodi, Laura
    Grossi, Silvia
    Di Lella, Filippo
    Falcioni, Maurizio
    D'Angelo, Giulia
    Sani, Emanuele
    Rossi, Sandra
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [26] Dental Practice during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study
    Prajapati, Aalap Sureshkumar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (03)
  • [27] ANTEPARTUM DISTRESS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    Di Buo, Agata
    Moretti, Patrizia
    Menculini, Giulia
    Minuti, Agnese
    Valentini, Eleonora
    Cerasoli, Ilaria
    Mancini, Niccolo
    Moro, Benedetta
    Radici, Sara
    Gerli, Sandro
    Tortorella, Alfonso
    PSYCHIATRIA DANUBINA, 2021, 33 : S137 - S141
  • [28] Innocence in the Shadow of COVID-19: Plea Decision Making During a Pandemic
    Wilford, Miko M.
    Zimmerman, David M.
    Yan, Shi
    Sutherland, Kelly T.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2021, 27 (04) : 739 - 750
  • [29] Islam and COVID-19: Understanding the ethics of decision making during a pandemic
    Suleman, Mehrunisha
    Sheikh, Aziz
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 11
  • [30] The decision to sew: making face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Hustvedt, Gwendolyn
    Liang, Yuli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FASHION DESIGN TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 2022, 15 (03) : 287 - 296