Who to escalate during a pandemic? A retrospective observational study about decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK

被引:0
|
作者
Beresford, Stephanie [1 ]
Tandon, Aditi [1 ,2 ]
Farina, Sofia [1 ]
Johnston, Brian [1 ,3 ]
Crews, Maryam [1 ]
Welters, Ingeborg Dorothea [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Crit Care, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Dept Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
COVID-19; critical care; frailty; clinical management;
D O I
10.1136/emermed-2022-212505
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundOptimal decision-making regarding who to admit to critical care in pandemic situations remains unclear. We compared age, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), 4C Mortality Score and hospital mortality in two separate COVID-19 surges based on the escalation decision made by the treating physician. MethodsA retrospective analysis of all referrals to critical care during the first COVID-19 surge (cohort 1, March/April 2020) and a late surge (cohort 2, October/November 2021) was undertaken. Patients with confirmed or high clinical suspicion of COVID-19 infection were included. A senior critical care physician assessed all patients regarding their suitability for potential intensive care unit admission. Demographics, CFS, 4C Mortality Score and hospital mortality were compared depending on the escalation decision made by the attending physician. Results203 patients were included in the study, 139 in cohort 1 and 64 in cohort 2. There were no significant differences in age, CFS and 4C scores between the two cohorts. Patients deemed suitable for escalation by clinicians were significantly younger with significantly lower CFS and 4C scores compared with patients who were not deemed to benefit from escalation. This pattern was observed in both cohorts. Mortality in patients not deemed suitable for escalation was 61.8% in cohort 1 and 47.4% in cohort 2 (p < 0.001). ConclusionsDecisions who to escalate to critical care in settings with limited resources pose moral distress on clinicians. 4C score, age and CFS did not change significantly between the two surges but differed significantly between patients deemed suitable for escalation and those deemed unsuitable by clinicians. Risk prediction tools may be useful in a pandemic to supplement clinical decision-making, even though escalation thresholds require adjustments to reflect changes in risk profile and outcomes between different pandemic surges.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neuroeconomics of decision-making during COVID-19 pandemic
    Bashir, Shahid
    Mir, Ali
    Altwaijri, Nouf
    Lizair, Mohammad
    Khalil, Amani
    Albesher, Rania
    Khallaf, Roaa
    Alshahrani, Saad
    Abualait, Turki
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (02)
  • [2] Changes in moral decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Enikolopov, S.
    Medvedeva, T.
    Boyko, O.
    Vorontsova, O.
    Kazmina, O.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 64 : S660 - S660
  • [3] Decision-making on the labour ward during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Bruce-Hickman, K.
    Fan, K.
    Plaat, F.
    Sheth, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2021, 45 : 150 - 151
  • [4] Shared Decision Making during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Kother, Anja K.
    Siebenhaar, Katharina U.
    Alpers, Georg W.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (04) : 430 - 438
  • [5] Clinical Decision Making During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Metlay, Joshua P.
    Armstrong, Katrina A.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (05) : 691 - +
  • [6] Ethical guidelines for medical decision-making during COVID-19 pandemic in Chile
    Valera, Luca
    Alejandro Carrasco, Maria
    Lopez, Rodrigo
    Ramos, Paulina
    von Bernhardi, Rommy
    Bedregal, Paula
    Florenzano, Alejandro
    Perez, Ivan
    Olivares, Patricia
    Vargas, Ivonne
    Gonzalez, Ximena
    Lopez, Paulo
    Duran, Gloria
    Richards, Constanza
    Castro, Ricardo
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2020, 148 (03) : 393 - 398
  • [7] Moral Decision-Making in Healthcare and Medical Professions During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Borhany H.
    Golbabaei S.
    Jameie M.
    Borhani K.
    Trends in Psychology, 2023, 31 (1) : 210 - 230
  • [8] Machine learning to assist clinical decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Debnath S.
    Barnaby D.P.
    Coppa K.
    Makhnevich A.
    Kim E.J.
    Chatterjee S.
    Tóth V.
    Levy T.J.
    Paradis M.
    Cohen S.L.
    Hirsch J.S.
    Zanos T.P.
    Bioelectronic Medicine, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [9] The Need for Standardized Metrics to Drive Decision-making During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Austin, J. Matthew
    Kachalia, Allen
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2021, 16 (01) : 56 - 58
  • [10] Inter-hospital Transfer Decision-making During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Qualitative Study
    Emily A. Harlan
    Eman Mubarak
    Janice Firn
    Susan D. Goold
    Andrew G. Shuman
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2023, 38 : 2568 - 2576