Impact of Artificial Intelligence- Assisted Indication Selection on Appropriateness Order Scoring for Imaging Clinical Decision Support

被引:1
|
作者
Shreve, Lauren A. [1 ,9 ]
Fried, Jessica G. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Fang [5 ]
Cao, Quy [5 ]
Pakpoor, Jina [6 ]
Kahn Jr, Charles E. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Zafar, Hanna M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Abdominal Imaging, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Radiol Informat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Tumor Response Assessment Core, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] UCL, Ctr Med Imaging, London, England
[7] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Qual, Philadelphia, PA USA
[9] Hosp Univ Penn, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Imaging clinical decision support; informatics; artificial intelligence; implementation science;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.04.016
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess appropriateness scoring and structured order entry after the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool for analysis of free-text indications. Methods: Advanced outpatient imaging orders in a multicenter health care system were recorded 7 months before (March 1, 2020, to September 21, 2020) and after (October 20, 2020, to May 13, 2021) the implementation of an AI tool targeting free-text indications. Clinical decision support score (not appropriate, may be appropriate, appropriate, or unscored) and indication type (structured, free-text, both, or none) were assessed. The X-2 and multivariate logistic regression adjusting for covariables with bootstrapping were used.Results: In total, 115,079 orders before and 150,950 orders after AI tool deployment were analyzed. The mean patient age was 59.3 +/- 15.5 years, and 146,035 (54.9%) were women; 49.9% of orders were for CT, 38.8% for MR, 5.9% for nuclear medicine, and 5.4% for PET. After deployment, scored orders increased to 52% from 30% (P < .001). Orders with structured indications increased to 67.3% from 34.6% (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, orders were more likely to be scored after tool deployment (odds ratio [OR], 2.7, 95% CI, 2.63-2.78; P < .001). Compared with physicians, orders placed by nonphysician providers were less likely to be scored (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.83; P < .001). MR (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.87) and PET (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.10-0.13) were less likely to be scored than CT (; P < .001). After AI tool deployment, 72,083 orders (47.8%) remained unscored, 45,186 (62.7%) with free-text-only indications. Conclusions: Embedding AI assistance within imaging clinical decision support was associated with increased structured indication orders and independently predicted a higher likelihood of scored orders. However, 48% of orders remained unscored, driven by both provider behavior and infrastructure-related barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1258 / 1266
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance
    Mahadevaiah, Geetha
    Prasad, R., V
    Bermejo, Inigo
    Jaffray, David
    Dekker, Andre
    Wee, Leonard
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (05) : E228 - E235
  • [42] Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Clinical Decision-Making in Health Care
    Maron, Jill L.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 44 (06) : 825 - 826
  • [43] Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Clinical Decision Support Systems and Care Delivery
    Ouanes, Khaled
    Farhah, Nesren
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 48 (01)
  • [44] Fairness Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: Mitigating Effect of Health Disparity
    Wu, Hang
    Zhu, Yuanda
    Shi, Wenqi
    Tong, Li
    Wang, May D.
    IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2025, 29 (02) : 815 - 823
  • [45] Artificial Intelligence- based Decision Support for HRCT Stratification in Fibrotic Lung Disease: An International Study of 195 Observers From 43 Countries
    Walsh, S. L.
    Wells, A. U.
    Calandriello, L.
    Felder, F.
    Mackintosh, J.
    Glaspole, I.
    Goh, N.
    Grainge, C.
    Hopkins, P.
    Moodley, Y. P.
    Vidya, N.
    Reynolds, P. N.
    Corte, T. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [46] Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review
    Akay, Ela Marie Z.
    Hilbert, Adam
    Carlisle, Benjamin G.
    Madai, Vince I.
    Mutke, Matthias A.
    Frey, Dietmar
    STROKE, 2023, 54 (06) : 1505 - 1516
  • [47] Artificial intelligence in intensive care: moving towards clinical decision support systems
    Montomoli, Jonathan
    Hilty, Matthias P.
    Ince, Can
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2022, 88 (12) : 1066 - 1072
  • [48] Portable healthcare computing and clinical decision support system enabled by artificial intelligence
    Salunkhe, Satish S.
    Jacob, Vinodkumar
    Tandon, Aditya
    Jeevitha, S.
    Arora, Rakesh Kumar
    Laddha, Shilpa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS MODELLING AND SIMULATION, 2022, 13 (03) : 228 - 233
  • [49] Evaluation of artificial intelligence based Clinical Decision Support System for detecting Nystagmus
    Moxam, Jillene
    Sanghvi, Harshal
    Danesh, Ali
    Graves, Sue
    Gupta, Shailesh
    Chalam, K. V.
    Pandya, Abhijit
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [50] Clinical decision support system for sleep staging with explanations from artificial intelligence
    Byun, S.
    Lee, T.
    Hwang, J.
    Lee, H.
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2022, 31