共 50 条
Impact of Artificial Intelligence- Assisted Indication Selection on Appropriateness Order Scoring for Imaging Clinical Decision Support
被引:1
|作者:
Shreve, Lauren A.
[1
,9
]
Fried, Jessica G.
[2
,3
,4
]
Liu, Fang
[5
]
Cao, Quy
[5
]
Pakpoor, Jina
[6
]
Kahn Jr, Charles E.
[5
,6
,7
]
Zafar, Hanna M.
[8
]
机构:
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Abdominal Imaging, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Radiol Informat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Tumor Response Assessment Core, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] UCL, Ctr Med Imaging, London, England
[7] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Qual, Philadelphia, PA USA
[9] Hosp Univ Penn, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词:
Imaging clinical decision support;
informatics;
artificial intelligence;
implementation science;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.04.016
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess appropriateness scoring and structured order entry after the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool for analysis of free-text indications. Methods: Advanced outpatient imaging orders in a multicenter health care system were recorded 7 months before (March 1, 2020, to September 21, 2020) and after (October 20, 2020, to May 13, 2021) the implementation of an AI tool targeting free-text indications. Clinical decision support score (not appropriate, may be appropriate, appropriate, or unscored) and indication type (structured, free-text, both, or none) were assessed. The X-2 and multivariate logistic regression adjusting for covariables with bootstrapping were used.Results: In total, 115,079 orders before and 150,950 orders after AI tool deployment were analyzed. The mean patient age was 59.3 +/- 15.5 years, and 146,035 (54.9%) were women; 49.9% of orders were for CT, 38.8% for MR, 5.9% for nuclear medicine, and 5.4% for PET. After deployment, scored orders increased to 52% from 30% (P < .001). Orders with structured indications increased to 67.3% from 34.6% (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, orders were more likely to be scored after tool deployment (odds ratio [OR], 2.7, 95% CI, 2.63-2.78; P < .001). Compared with physicians, orders placed by nonphysician providers were less likely to be scored (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.83; P < .001). MR (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.87) and PET (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.10-0.13) were less likely to be scored than CT (; P < .001). After AI tool deployment, 72,083 orders (47.8%) remained unscored, 45,186 (62.7%) with free-text-only indications. Conclusions: Embedding AI assistance within imaging clinical decision support was associated with increased structured indication orders and independently predicted a higher likelihood of scored orders. However, 48% of orders remained unscored, driven by both provider behavior and infrastructure-related barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1258 / 1266
页数:9
相关论文