Impact of Artificial Intelligence- Assisted Indication Selection on Appropriateness Order Scoring for Imaging Clinical Decision Support

被引:1
|
作者
Shreve, Lauren A. [1 ,9 ]
Fried, Jessica G. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Fang [5 ]
Cao, Quy [5 ]
Pakpoor, Jina [6 ]
Kahn Jr, Charles E. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Zafar, Hanna M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Abdominal Imaging, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Radiol Informat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Tumor Response Assessment Core, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] UCL, Ctr Med Imaging, London, England
[7] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Qual, Philadelphia, PA USA
[9] Hosp Univ Penn, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Imaging clinical decision support; informatics; artificial intelligence; implementation science;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.04.016
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess appropriateness scoring and structured order entry after the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool for analysis of free-text indications. Methods: Advanced outpatient imaging orders in a multicenter health care system were recorded 7 months before (March 1, 2020, to September 21, 2020) and after (October 20, 2020, to May 13, 2021) the implementation of an AI tool targeting free-text indications. Clinical decision support score (not appropriate, may be appropriate, appropriate, or unscored) and indication type (structured, free-text, both, or none) were assessed. The X-2 and multivariate logistic regression adjusting for covariables with bootstrapping were used.Results: In total, 115,079 orders before and 150,950 orders after AI tool deployment were analyzed. The mean patient age was 59.3 +/- 15.5 years, and 146,035 (54.9%) were women; 49.9% of orders were for CT, 38.8% for MR, 5.9% for nuclear medicine, and 5.4% for PET. After deployment, scored orders increased to 52% from 30% (P < .001). Orders with structured indications increased to 67.3% from 34.6% (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, orders were more likely to be scored after tool deployment (odds ratio [OR], 2.7, 95% CI, 2.63-2.78; P < .001). Compared with physicians, orders placed by nonphysician providers were less likely to be scored (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.83; P < .001). MR (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.87) and PET (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.10-0.13) were less likely to be scored than CT (; P < .001). After AI tool deployment, 72,083 orders (47.8%) remained unscored, 45,186 (62.7%) with free-text-only indications. Conclusions: Embedding AI assistance within imaging clinical decision support was associated with increased structured indication orders and independently predicted a higher likelihood of scored orders. However, 48% of orders remained unscored, driven by both provider behavior and infrastructure-related barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1258 / 1266
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial intelligence-augmented perioperative clinical decision support, KIPeriOP
    Englert, Anne
    Bendz, Pamela
    ANAESTHESIST, 2021, 70 (11): : 962 - 963
  • [32] ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE AND DECISION-SUPPORT TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLINICAL LABORATORY
    MARQUARDT, VC
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1993, 24 (12) : 777 - 782
  • [33] Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support and outcome prediction - applications in stroke
    Yeo, Melissa
    Kok, Hong Kuan
    Kutaiba, Numan
    Maingard, Julian
    Thijs, Vincent
    Tahayori, Bahman
    Russell, Jeremy
    Jhamb, Ashu
    Chandra, Ronil V.
    Brooks, Mark
    Barras, Christen D.
    Asadi, Hamed
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, : 518 - 528
  • [34] Improved Appropriateness of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging After Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Mechanism
    Chepelev, Leonid L.
    Wang, Xuan
    Gold, Benjamin
    Bonzel, Clara-Lea
    Rybicki Jr, Frank
    Uyeda, Jennifer W.
    Sheikh, Adnan
    Anderson, Dan
    Lindaman, Jared
    Mogel, Greg
    Mitsouras, Dimitrios
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    Cai, Tianxi
    Rybicki, Frank J.
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2021, 34 (02) : 397 - 403
  • [35] Improved Appropriateness of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging After Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Mechanism
    Leonid L. Chepelev
    Xuan Wang
    Benjamin Gold
    Clara-Lea Bonzel
    Frank Rybicki Jr
    Jennifer W Uyeda
    Adnan Sheikh
    Dan Anderson
    Jared Lindaman
    Greg Mogel
    Dimitrios Mitsouras
    Mary C. Mahoney
    Tianxi Cai
    Frank J. Rybicki
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2021, 34 : 397 - 403
  • [36] Utilization and appropriateness in cervical spine trauma imaging: implementation of clinical decision support criteria
    John P. Hynes
    K. Hunter
    M. Rochford
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2020, 189 : 333 - 336
  • [37] Utilization and appropriateness in cervical spine trauma imaging: implementation of clinical decision support criteria
    Hynes, John P.
    Hunter, K.
    Rochford, M.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 189 (01) : 333 - 336
  • [38] Clinical Decision Support: Impact on Appropriate Imaging Utilization
    Zygmont, Matthew E.
    Ikuta, Ichiro
    V. Nguyen, Xuan
    Frigini, L. Alexandre R.
    Segovis, Colin
    Naeger, David M.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (07) : 1433 - 1440
  • [39] Intelligent Financial Processing Based on Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Decision Support System
    Zhao, Xinyu
    Saeed, Omer
    MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 2022
  • [40] The Impact of Dataset Size on an Artificial Intelligence-Guided Clinical Decision Support System for Radiation Therapy Planning
    Chan, J.
    Chen, J.
    Valdes, G.
    Yom, S. S.
    Pattison, A.
    Carpenter, C.
    Solberg, T. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E535 - E535