Comparison of Throat and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Molecular Detection of Enterovirus in Pediatric Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Han, Eunhee [1 ]
Bae, Mi Hyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, Daejeon St Marys Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Guri Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Coll Med, 153 Gyeongchun Ro, Guri 11923, South Korea
关键词
enterovirus; throat swab; nasopharyngeal swab; RT-rPCR; RESPIRATORY VIRUSES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.7754/Clin.Lab.2022.221022
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Enterovirus infections frequently occur in children worldwide. Molecular assays are widely used to detect enterovirus. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and throat swabs (TS) are common specimen types used in clini-cal practice. Here, the reliability of TS for detecting enterovirus in pediatric patients was compared with that of NPS using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-rPCR). Methods: Results obtained using the Allplex Respiratory Panel 2 (Seegene, Korea) for NPS (NPS-RP) and Accu-Power EV Real-time RT-PCR (Bioneer, Korea) for TS (TS-EV), which were performed simultaneously between September 2017 to March 2020, were initially compared. Cross examination (Allplex Respiratory Panel 2 assay using TS and AccuPower EV assay with NPS) was performed for specimens collected between July 2019 to March 2020 to evaluate the performance of the enterovirus assays based on each specimen type. Results: Among the 742 case results of initial tests, 597 cases (80.5%) tested negative in both assays, and 91 cases (12.6%) tested positive in both assays. Fifty-four discrepant results were observed: 39 cases (5.3%) tested positive in TS-EV and negative in NPS-RP, and 15 cases (2.0%) tested positive in NPS-RP and negative in TS-EV. The overall percent agreement was 92.7%. In the 99 cases cross examined, overall percent agreements were 98.0%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 89.9% for TS-EV vs. TS-RP, NPS-RP vs. NPS-EV, TS-EV vs. NPS-EV, and NPS-RP vs. TS -RP, respectively. Conclusions: TS yields a high agreement rate with NPS in detecting enterovirus, regardless of single-plex or multi-plex RT-rPCR assays. Thus, TS could be a good alternative specimen in pediatric patients who are reluctant to NPS sampling.
引用
收藏
页码:1269 / 1275
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Oral Rinses and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA
    McMillen, T.
    Jani, K.
    Viale, A.
    Robilotti, E.
    Aslam, A.
    Sokoli, D.
    Mason, G.
    Shah, M.
    Korenstein, D.
    Kamboj, M.
    Babady, E.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 22 (11): : S37 - S38
  • [32] Concordance of nasal swabs and nasopharyngeal swabs in the detection of respiratory viruses by direct immunofluorescence
    Del Pozo, Paulina
    Abarca, Katia
    Concha, Ida
    Cerda, Jaime
    REVISTA CHILENA DE INFECTOLOGIA, 2014, 31 (02): : 160 - 164
  • [33] Anterior nasal swabs compared to nasopharyngeal swabs for detection of respiratory viruses in children
    Kietzman, Abigail P.
    Neeley, Nicole
    Selvarangan, Rangaraj
    Banerjee, Dithi
    Goldman, Jennifer L.
    Schuster, Jennifer E.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2025, 112 (03)
  • [34] Comparison of nasal swabs with throat swabs for the detection of respiratory viruses by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR in adult Hajj pilgrims
    Benkouiten, Samir
    Gautret, Philippe
    Belhouchat, Khadidja
    Drali, Tassadit
    Nougairede, Antoine
    Salez, Nicolas
    Memish, Ziad A.
    Al Masri, Malak
    Raoult, Didier
    Brouqui, Philippe
    Parola, Philippe
    Charrel, Remi N.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2015, 70 (02) : 207 - 210
  • [35] Evaluating addition of self-collected throat swabs to nasal swabs for respiratory virus detection
    Fisher, Cynthia E.
    Boeckh, Michael
    Jerome, Keith R.
    Englund, Janet
    Kuypers, Jane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2019, 115 : 43 - 46
  • [36] Estimating the prevalence of six common respiratory viral infections in Zhangzhou, China using nasopharyngeal swabs in adults and throat swabs in Children
    Zeng, Yuanjun
    Wang, Guowei
    Yang, Huicong
    Li, Hongmei
    Guo, Yueli
    Liu, Huili
    Xu, Xiaojun
    Zhang, Chunbin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [37] DETECTION OF GROUP-A STREPTOCOCCI IN THROAT SWABS BY DIRECT FLUOROMETRY
    WEBB, CD
    MOODY, MD
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1969, 17 (05) : 682 - &
  • [38] Comparison of Nasal Swabs, Nasopharyngeal Swabs, and Saliva Samples for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other Respiratory Virus Infections
    Jung, Eun Ju
    Lee, Su Kyung
    Shin, Seon Hee
    Kim, Jin Soo
    Woo, Heungjeong
    Cho, Eun-Jung
    Hyun, Jungwon
    Kim, Jae-Seok
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 43 (05) : 434 - 442
  • [39] Etiologic predictive value of a rapid immunoassay for the detection of group A Streptococcus antigen from throat swabs in patients presenting with a sore throat
    Orda, Ulrich
    Gunnarsson, Ronny
    Orda, Sabine
    Fitzgerald, Mark
    Rofe, Geoff
    Dargan, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 45 : 32 - 35
  • [40] Comparison of influenza viral load in nasopharyngeal and midturbinate swabs
    Bernasconi, Corrado
    Katugampola, Laurie
    Wildum, Steffen
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2024, 18 (01)