Comparison of Throat and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Molecular Detection of Enterovirus in Pediatric Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Han, Eunhee [1 ]
Bae, Mi Hyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, Daejeon St Marys Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Guri Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Coll Med, 153 Gyeongchun Ro, Guri 11923, South Korea
关键词
enterovirus; throat swab; nasopharyngeal swab; RT-rPCR; RESPIRATORY VIRUSES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.7754/Clin.Lab.2022.221022
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Enterovirus infections frequently occur in children worldwide. Molecular assays are widely used to detect enterovirus. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and throat swabs (TS) are common specimen types used in clini-cal practice. Here, the reliability of TS for detecting enterovirus in pediatric patients was compared with that of NPS using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-rPCR). Methods: Results obtained using the Allplex Respiratory Panel 2 (Seegene, Korea) for NPS (NPS-RP) and Accu-Power EV Real-time RT-PCR (Bioneer, Korea) for TS (TS-EV), which were performed simultaneously between September 2017 to March 2020, were initially compared. Cross examination (Allplex Respiratory Panel 2 assay using TS and AccuPower EV assay with NPS) was performed for specimens collected between July 2019 to March 2020 to evaluate the performance of the enterovirus assays based on each specimen type. Results: Among the 742 case results of initial tests, 597 cases (80.5%) tested negative in both assays, and 91 cases (12.6%) tested positive in both assays. Fifty-four discrepant results were observed: 39 cases (5.3%) tested positive in TS-EV and negative in NPS-RP, and 15 cases (2.0%) tested positive in NPS-RP and negative in TS-EV. The overall percent agreement was 92.7%. In the 99 cases cross examined, overall percent agreements were 98.0%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 89.9% for TS-EV vs. TS-RP, NPS-RP vs. NPS-EV, TS-EV vs. NPS-EV, and NPS-RP vs. TS -RP, respectively. Conclusions: TS yields a high agreement rate with NPS in detecting enterovirus, regardless of single-plex or multi-plex RT-rPCR assays. Thus, TS could be a good alternative specimen in pediatric patients who are reluctant to NPS sampling.
引用
收藏
页码:1269 / 1275
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of throat swab and nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens for rapid detection of adenovirus
    Hara, Michimaru
    Takao, Shinichi
    Shimazu, Yukie
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2015, 82 (02) : 135 - 136
  • [22] Effect of not vortexing nasopharyngeal and throat swabs on SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection: A pilot study
    Kanji, Jamil N.
    Pabbaraju, Kanti
    Wong, Anita
    Beitku, Candace
    Deo, Ashwin
    Kailey, Seema
    Ma, Raymond
    Tipples, Graham
    Zelyas, Nathan
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2022, 301
  • [23] Comparison of the pain experienced with anterior nasal swabs and nose and throat swabs in children
    Harwood, Rachel
    Rad, Laura
    Larru, Beatriz
    Kelly, Christopher
    Kenny, Simon
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2022, 107 (02) : 207 - 207
  • [24] Diagnostic sensitivity of nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs for the molecular detection of EHV-1
    Plisterla, N.
    Mapes, S.
    Wilson, W. D.
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2008, 162 (16) : 520 - 521
  • [25] Comparison of throat swabs with sputum specimens for the detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae antigen by direct immunofluorescence
    Garnett, P
    Brogan, O
    Lafong, C
    Fox, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (04) : 309 - 311
  • [26] Saliva is Comparable to Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Callahan, Cody
    Ditelberg, Sarah
    Dutta, Sanjucta
    Littlehale, Nancy
    Cheng, Annie
    Kupczewski, Kristin
    McVay, Danielle
    Riedel, Stefan
    Kirby, James E.
    Arnaout, Ramy
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [27] RAPID DETECTION OF GROUP-A STREPTOCOCCI ON THROAT SWABS
    PETTS, DN
    MANTELL, GA
    MEDICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES, 1985, 42 (03): : 291 - 292
  • [28] COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR CULTURING THROAT SWABS FROM CYSTIC-FIBROSIS PATIENTS
    HOPPE, JE
    THEURERMAINKA, U
    STERN, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (07) : 1896 - 1898
  • [29] Comparison of Illumigene Group A Streptococcus Assay and Culture for Detection of Group A Streptococcus from Throat Swabs
    Chan, E.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 15 (06): : 879 - 879
  • [30] Comparison of Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Saliva Samples for the Detection of SARS-Cov-2 RNA
    McMillen, T.
    Jani, K.
    Viale, A.
    Robilotti, E.
    Aslam, A.
    Sokoli, D.
    Mason, G.
    Shah, M.
    Korenstein, D.
    Kamboj, M.
    Babady, E.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 22 (11): : S37 - S37