Seismic resilience analysis of self-centering prestressed concrete frames with generalized flag-shaped hysteretic behavior

被引:4
|
作者
Zheng, Jule [1 ]
Zhou, Zhen [1 ]
Zeng, Bin [2 ]
Huang, Linjie [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] MCC Grp, Cent Res Inst Bldg & Construct, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Generalized flag-shaped hysteretic behavior; SCPC frame; Second stiffness; Energy dissipation ratio; Resilience assessment; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; DAMPER;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116947
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To increase the stiffness and energy dissipation of conventional self-centering concrete joints, this paper proposes a self-centering prestressed concrete frame with a generalized flag-shaped hysteretic behavior (GFS-SCPC). First, the working mechanism of the GFS-SCPC joint is clarified, and the key parameters affecting the generalized flag-shaped hysteresis are proposed: the second stiffness ks theta and the energy dissipation ratio beta E. Subsequently, the three-dimensional self-centering prestressed concrete frame with flag-shaped hysteretic behavior (FS-SCPC) and GFS-SCPC frames are established, and the time history analysis and incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) method are carried out to compare their seismic performances. Finally, according to the FEMA P-58 specification, the resilience indexes of the frames with different hysteretic parameters are evaluated to clarify the influence of ks theta and beta E. The results show that the energy dissipation capacity of the GFS-SCPC frame increases with larger second stiffness ks theta and the energy dissipation ratio beta E. The increase of ks theta effectively controls the maximum drift angle and acceleration response of the GFS-SCPC frame, which would reduce the vulnerability of the structure. The main structure of the GFS-SCPC frame remains undamaged after the earthquake, and the loss mainly comes from the damage of the acceleration-sensitive non-structural components of the upper floors. The increase of ks theta can effectively reduce the damage degree of non-structural components and further reduce the resilience indexes, including casualties, repair time and repair cost, while the increase of beta E alone does not significantly improve the resilience indexes. Therefore, the proposed GFS-SCPC frame with larger second stiffness has better seismic resilience performance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A novel inerter-enhanced self-centering damper (ISCD) for improving seismic resilience of self-centering RC building frames
    Kong, Sihua
    Zhao, Guifeng
    Ma, Yuhong
    Dong, You
    Feng, Ruiwei
    Yang, Zhenyu
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2025, 330
  • [32] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames with and without Masonry Infill Walls: Experimental and Numerical Models
    Zhu, Ruizhao
    Guo, Tong
    Song, Lianglong
    Yang, Kun
    Xu, Gang
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 150 (08)
  • [33] Seismic risk assessment of self-centering prestressed concrete frames with sliding and masonry infill walls: experimental and numerical models
    Zhu, Ruizhao
    Guo, Tong
    Xie, LinLin
    Song, Lianglong
    Yang, Kun
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 22 (08) : 4115 - 4141
  • [34] Seismic behavior of an industrial steel structure retrofitted with self-centering hysteretic dampers
    Morelli, F.
    Piscini, A.
    Salvatore, W.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2017, 139 : 157 - 175
  • [35] Modified flag-shaped model for self-centering system and its equivalent linearization and structural optimization for stochastic excitation
    Zhang Hongmei
    Quan Liumeng
    Lu Xilin
    Xu Jiaqi
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 215
  • [36] Study on Hysteretic Performance of Self-Centering Energy Dissipation Braces and Seismic Behaviors of Braced Frames
    Jiang H.
    Xu L.
    Tianjin Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue yu Gongcheng Jishu Ban)/Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology, 2021, 54 (03): : 237 - 244
  • [37] Influence of seismic duration on performance assessment: application to self-centering concrete frames
    Song, Ge
    Gu, Anqi
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 22 (09) : 4677 - 4704
  • [38] Impact of self-centering brace type on the seismic fragility of reinforced concrete frames
    Wang, Jishuai
    Guo, Tong
    Zhang, Yunwen
    Ji, Xinqiang
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (08) : 1152 - 1163
  • [39] Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frames Retrofitted with Self-Centering Hybrid Wall
    Hu, Xiaobin
    Zhang, Yunfeng
    Moghaddasi B, Nasim S.
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 15 (12) : 2131 - 2143
  • [40] The normalized inelastic displacement spectra for seismic response estimation of a SDOF system with a generalized flag-shaped hysteretic model
    Yifeng Wu
    Zijian Wang
    Aiqun Li
    Guodong Zhang
    Jiangdi Fu
    Hao Wang
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 22 : 3011 - 3029