Seismic resilience analysis of self-centering prestressed concrete frames with generalized flag-shaped hysteretic behavior

被引:4
|
作者
Zheng, Jule [1 ]
Zhou, Zhen [1 ]
Zeng, Bin [2 ]
Huang, Linjie [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] MCC Grp, Cent Res Inst Bldg & Construct, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Generalized flag-shaped hysteretic behavior; SCPC frame; Second stiffness; Energy dissipation ratio; Resilience assessment; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; DAMPER;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116947
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To increase the stiffness and energy dissipation of conventional self-centering concrete joints, this paper proposes a self-centering prestressed concrete frame with a generalized flag-shaped hysteretic behavior (GFS-SCPC). First, the working mechanism of the GFS-SCPC joint is clarified, and the key parameters affecting the generalized flag-shaped hysteresis are proposed: the second stiffness ks theta and the energy dissipation ratio beta E. Subsequently, the three-dimensional self-centering prestressed concrete frame with flag-shaped hysteretic behavior (FS-SCPC) and GFS-SCPC frames are established, and the time history analysis and incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) method are carried out to compare their seismic performances. Finally, according to the FEMA P-58 specification, the resilience indexes of the frames with different hysteretic parameters are evaluated to clarify the influence of ks theta and beta E. The results show that the energy dissipation capacity of the GFS-SCPC frame increases with larger second stiffness ks theta and the energy dissipation ratio beta E. The increase of ks theta effectively controls the maximum drift angle and acceleration response of the GFS-SCPC frame, which would reduce the vulnerability of the structure. The main structure of the GFS-SCPC frame remains undamaged after the earthquake, and the loss mainly comes from the damage of the acceleration-sensitive non-structural components of the upper floors. The increase of ks theta can effectively reduce the damage degree of non-structural components and further reduce the resilience indexes, including casualties, repair time and repair cost, while the increase of beta E alone does not significantly improve the resilience indexes. Therefore, the proposed GFS-SCPC frame with larger second stiffness has better seismic resilience performance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hysteretic behavior and resilience analysis of a new self-centering buckling restrained braces
    Shen, Maoyu
    Zhou, Zhi
    Liu, Jili
    Wang, Lijie
    Huang, Wei
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 173
  • [22] Seismic design methodology for self-centering reinforced concrete frames
    Lu, Xilin
    Jiang, Chun
    Yang, Boya
    Quan, Liumeng
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 119 : 358 - 374
  • [23] Hysteretic behavior investigation of self-centering double-column rocking piers for seismic resilience
    Han, Qiang
    Jia, Zhenlei
    Xu, Kun
    Zhou, Yulong
    Du, Xiuli
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 188 : 218 - 232
  • [24] Seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames considering Soil-Structure Interaction
    Song, Liang-Long
    Guo, Tong
    Shi, Xin
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2019, 2019
  • [25] Experimental investigation and seismic response behavior of a self-centering precast concrete frame with hysteretic dampers
    Geng, Fangfang
    Ding, Youliang
    Wu, Honglei
    Cai, Xiaoning
    Zhang, Yun
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 240
  • [26] Distribution of hysteretic energy demands in self-centering concrete frames with hybrid joints
    Song, Ge
    Yang, T. Y.
    Zhou, Ying
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 148 (148)
  • [27] Energy-based seismic design for self-centering concrete frames
    Ge Song
    T. Y. Yang
    Ying Zhou
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19 : 5113 - 5137
  • [28] Energy-based seismic design for self-centering concrete frames
    Song, Ge
    Yang, T. Y.
    Zhou, Ying
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (12) : 5113 - 5137
  • [29] Seismic resilience assessment of self-centering prestressed concrete frame with different energy dissipation ratio and second stiffness
    Zheng, Jule
    Huang, Liang
    Zhou, Zhen
    Huang, Linjie
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 63
  • [30] Inelastic response spectra of self-centering structures with the flag-shaped hysteretic response subjected to near-fault pulse-type ground motions
    Dong, Huihui
    Han, Qiang
    Du, Xiuli
    Cheng, Shoushan
    He, Haifang
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2021, 37 (04) : 2767 - 2794