Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine to oral midazolam as premedication for propofol sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: the MIDEX MRI trial

被引:3
|
作者
Wabelo, Olivia Nzungu [1 ,2 ]
Schmartz, Denis [2 ,3 ]
Giancursio, Mario [1 ]
De Pooter, Francoise [1 ]
Caruso, Giulia [1 ]
Fils, Jean-Francois [4 ]
Van der Linden, Philippe [5 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Hop Erasme, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Ars Statistica, Nivelles, Belgium
[5] Grand Hop Charleroi, Dept Anesthesiol, Charleroi, Belgium
关键词
MRI; Pediatric sedation; Midazolam; Dexmedetomidine; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07529-0
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Children under 6 years who need magnetic resonance imaging usually require sedation to obtain best quality images, but the optimal sedation protocol remains to be determined. In 2018, we showed a 22% interruption in image acquisition during magnetic resonance imaging when performing a propofol-based sedation using a bolus approach. As non-pharmacological premedication is often insufficient to reduce the anxiety of children related to parental separation, pharmacological premedication may be useful to facilitate the induction of anesthesia. In our institution, effective premedication is obtained oral intake of midazolam, though its administration relies on patients' compliance and could also lead to paradoxical reaction. Dexmedetomidine has a safe profile in the pediatric population and can therefore represent an interesting alternative. The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate the superiority of intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to oral midazolam as premedication in reducing the occurrence of any event requiring temporary or definitive interruption of the examination to allow anesthesiologist intervention in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging under propofol sedation. Methods In this single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator-controlled, superiority trial, we planned to include 250 patients, aged 6 months to 6 years, undergoing a scheduled magnetic resonance imaging requiring the presence of an anesthesiologist. After informed consent, the patients will be randomized to receive either oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication. The data will be analyzed in intention to treat, using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z, chi-square, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney U tests. A P-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Discussion The MIDEX MRI study will assess the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to oral midazolam to improve the quality of a propofol-based sedation prior to magnetic resonance imaging, without negative repercussion on the postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine to oral midazolam as premedication for propofol sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: the MIDEX MRI trial
    Olivia Nzungu Wabelo
    Denis Schmartz
    Mario Giancursio
    Françoise De Pooter
    Giulia Caruso
    Jean-François Fils
    Philippe Van der Linden
    Trials, 24
  • [2] Efficacy of intranasal ketamine and midazolam for pediatric sedation: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Khoshrang, Hossein
    Alavi, Cyrus Emir
    Rimaz, Siamak
    Mirmansouri, Ali
    Farzi, Farnoush
    Biazar, Gelareh
    Atrkarroushan, Zahra
    Khadem, Nazanin Sabet
    CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (04) : 539 - 543
  • [3] Ozanimod Demonstrates Efficacy and Safety in a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Trial of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (SUNBEAM)
    Comi, Giancarlo
    Arnold, Douglas
    Cree, Bruce
    Kappos, Ludwig
    Selmaj, Krzysztof
    Bar-Or, Amit
    Steinman, Lawrence
    Hartung, Hans-Peter
    Montalban, Xavier
    Havrdova, Eva
    Sheffield, James
    Raghupathi, Kartik
    Cohen, Jeffrey
    NEUROLOGY, 2018, 90
  • [4] Comparison of oral midazolam with intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication for children undergoing CT imaging: a randomized, double-blind, and controlled study
    Ghai, Babita
    Jain, Kajal
    Saxena, Akshay Kumar
    Bhatia, Nidhi
    Sodhi, Kushaljit Singh
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 27 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [5] The efficacy of alendronate in reducing the risk for vertebral fracture in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, double-dummy trial
    Kushida, K
    Shiraki, M
    Nakamura, T
    Kishimoto, H
    Morii, H
    Yamamoto, K
    Kaneda, K
    Fukunaga, M
    Inoue, T
    Nakashima, M
    Orimo, H
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2002, 63 (09): : 606 - 620
  • [6] Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Prakhar Gyanesh
    Rudrashish Haldar
    Divya Srivastava
    Prashant Mohan Agrawal
    Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari
    P. K. Singh
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2014, 28 : 12 - 18
  • [7] Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Gyanesh, Prakhar
    Haldar, Rudrashish
    Srivastava, Divya
    Agrawal, Prashant Mohan
    Tiwari, Akhilesh Kumar
    Singh, P. K.
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2014, 28 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [8] Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine with ketofol and ketofol alone on quality of sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial
    Chakravarty, Reena
    Goyal, Neha
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Mohammed, Sadik
    Kamal, Manoj
    Chhabra, Swati
    Bhatia, Pradeep
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 18 (04) : 521 - 527
  • [9] Effect of esketamine vs dexmedetomidine adjunct to propofol sedation for pediatric 3Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Xu, Shang-xian
    Shan, Xi-sheng
    Gao, Jin-meng
    Liu, Hua-xian
    Chen, Wei-rong
    Gao, Shan-shan
    Ji, Fu-hai
    Peng, Ke
    Wang, Qian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [10] Effect of esketamine vs dexmedetomidine adjunct to propofol sedation for pediatric 3Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Shang-xian Xu
    Xi-sheng Shan
    Jin-meng Gao
    Hua-xian Liu
    Wei-rong Chen
    Shan-shan Gao
    Fu-hai Ji
    Ke Peng
    Qian Wang
    European Journal of Medical Research, 27