Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine to oral midazolam as premedication for propofol sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: the MIDEX MRI trial

被引:3
|
作者
Wabelo, Olivia Nzungu [1 ,2 ]
Schmartz, Denis [2 ,3 ]
Giancursio, Mario [1 ]
De Pooter, Francoise [1 ]
Caruso, Giulia [1 ]
Fils, Jean-Francois [4 ]
Van der Linden, Philippe [5 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Hop Erasme, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Ars Statistica, Nivelles, Belgium
[5] Grand Hop Charleroi, Dept Anesthesiol, Charleroi, Belgium
关键词
MRI; Pediatric sedation; Midazolam; Dexmedetomidine; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07529-0
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Children under 6 years who need magnetic resonance imaging usually require sedation to obtain best quality images, but the optimal sedation protocol remains to be determined. In 2018, we showed a 22% interruption in image acquisition during magnetic resonance imaging when performing a propofol-based sedation using a bolus approach. As non-pharmacological premedication is often insufficient to reduce the anxiety of children related to parental separation, pharmacological premedication may be useful to facilitate the induction of anesthesia. In our institution, effective premedication is obtained oral intake of midazolam, though its administration relies on patients' compliance and could also lead to paradoxical reaction. Dexmedetomidine has a safe profile in the pediatric population and can therefore represent an interesting alternative. The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate the superiority of intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to oral midazolam as premedication in reducing the occurrence of any event requiring temporary or definitive interruption of the examination to allow anesthesiologist intervention in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging under propofol sedation. Methods In this single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator-controlled, superiority trial, we planned to include 250 patients, aged 6 months to 6 years, undergoing a scheduled magnetic resonance imaging requiring the presence of an anesthesiologist. After informed consent, the patients will be randomized to receive either oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication. The data will be analyzed in intention to treat, using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z, chi-square, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney U tests. A P-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Discussion The MIDEX MRI study will assess the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to oral midazolam to improve the quality of a propofol-based sedation prior to magnetic resonance imaging, without negative repercussion on the postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial evaluating efficacy and safety of avatrombopag versus eltrombopag in ITP
    Tarantino, Michael D.
    Bussel, James B.
    Lee, Eun-Ju
    Jamieson, Brian D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2023, 202 (04) : 897 - 899
  • [22] Safety and Efficacy of WC2031 Versus Vibramycin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled, Multicenter Trial
    Geisler, William M.
    Koltun, William D.
    Abdelsayed, Nader
    Burigo, John
    Mena, Leandro
    Taylor, Stephanie N.
    Batteiger, Byron E.
    Thurman, Andrea R.
    Hook, Edward W., III
    Vaughn, Toby A.
    Annett, Miriam P.
    Muenzen, Ruth A.
    Caminis, John
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 55 (01) : 82 - 88
  • [23] Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine-esketamine sedation for pediatric acceptance of facemask: single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Zhang, Kan
    Zhang, Guangxuan
    Zhang, Yanmei
    Wang, Jingjing
    Bai, Jie
    Zheng, Jijian
    Tao, Yujuan
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [24] Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine/Ketamine with Propofol/Fentanyl for Sedation in Colonoscopy Patients: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
    Aminnejad, Reza
    Hormati, Ahmad
    Shafiee, Hamed
    Alemi, Faezeh
    Hormati, Maryam
    Saeidi, Mohammad
    Ahmadpour, Sajjad
    Sabouri, Seyed Mahdi
    Aghaali, Mohammad
    CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2022, 21 (08) : 724 - 731
  • [25] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Li, Aijun
    Li, Ning
    Zhu, Lei
    Xu, Zige
    Wang, Yifan
    Li, Junjie
    Zhang, Gerong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam sedation in patients undergoing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a double blind randomized controlled trial
    Aggarwal, Ashutosh
    Kumari, Renu
    Jain, Kajal
    Agarwal, Ritesh
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa versus oral carbidopa/levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease patients: Design of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active controlled 12-week trial
    Facheris, Maurizio
    Robieson, Weining
    Fisseha, Nahome
    Standaert, David
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 429 : 331 - 331
  • [28] Efficacy and Safety of Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa Versus Oral Carbidopa/Levodopa in Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients: Design of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active Controlled 12-Week Trial
    Facheris, Maurizio
    Robieson, Weining
    Fisseha, Nahome
    Standaert, David
    NEUROLOGY, 2021, 96 (15)
  • [29] Primary results of DECIDE: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial of daclizumab HYP vs. Interferon β-1a in RRMS patients
    Kappos, L.
    Selmaj, K.
    Arnold, D. L.
    Havrdova, E.
    Boyko, A.
    Kaufman, M.
    Wiendl, H.
    Rose, J.
    Greenberg, S.
    Demirhan, E.
    Sweetser, M.
    Riester, K.
    Elkins, J.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 : 38 - 38
  • [30] Cardiac safety profile of nebulized formoterol in adults with COPD: A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled trial
    Nelson, Harold S.
    Gross, Nicholas J.
    Levine, Bernard
    Kerwin, Edward M.
    Rinehart, Mike
    Denis-Mize, Kimberly
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 29 (10) : 2167 - 2178