Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine with ketofol and ketofol alone on quality of sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial

被引:0
|
作者
Chakravarty, Reena [1 ]
Goyal, Neha [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [1 ]
Mohammed, Sadik [1 ]
Kamal, Manoj [1 ]
Chhabra, Swati [1 ]
Bhatia, Pradeep [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Conscious sedation; dexmedetomidine; ketofol; magnetic resonance imaging; sedation; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; PROPOFOL; CHILDREN; KETAMINE; COMBINATION; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.4103/sja.sja_327_24
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Patient movement during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most frequent cause of artifacts and poor scan quality. Children cannot lie still. Thus, anesthesia is required to keep the child calm and immobile. This randomized double-blinded clinical trial compares the clinical effects of the addition of dexmedetomidine as premedication with ketofol on the quality of sedation. We hypothesized that the addition of dexmedetomidine would improve the quality of sedation. Methods: A total of 132 children aged 6 months to 10 years were randomized into groups DK (dexmedetomidine-ketofol) and K (ketofol). DK received an intravenous bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) as premedication 10 minutes prior. Both the groups were induced with ketofol (0.5 mg/kg), and sedation was maintained with propfol infusion (100 mcg/kg/min). The primary objective was the quality of sedation as assessed by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. Image quality, requirement of rescue propofol dose, recovery, and adverse events were also studied. Data are given as median [interquartile range (IQR)] or frequency. Results: All 132 children completed MRI scans. The DK group showed significantly better quality of sedation, 71% versus 47% of children, a median difference of 1 (-0.569 to -0.0969), P < .005, a better quality of scan, a reduced number of additional doses of propofol, and a decreased total dose of propofol. Hemodynamic parameters and recovery times for the two groups were similar. There were no significant side effects in both groups. Conclusion: The quality of sedation and the quality of the MRI scan are greatly improved by administering dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) 10 minutes before to induction. Additionally, this technique decreases the need of propofol and gives better hemodynamic stability without delaying the recovery time.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dexmedetomidine compared to ketofol for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Hussien, Rania Maher
    Emam, Dalia Fahmy
    Shoukry, Aktham Adel
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2022, 26 (05) : 595 - 601
  • [2] Thiopental versus ketofol in paediatric sedation for magnetic resonance imaging: A randomized trial
    Ustun, Yasemin Burcu
    Atalay, Yunus Oktay
    Koksal, Ersin
    Kaya, Cengiz
    Ozkan, Fatih
    Sener, Elif Bengi
    Polat, Ahmet Veysel
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 67 (02) : 247 - 251
  • [3] Adverse Events With Ketamine Versus Ketofol for Procedural Sedation on Adults: A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lemoel, Fabien
    Contenti, Julie
    Giolito, Didier
    Boiffier, Mathieu
    Rapp, Jocelyn
    Istria, Jacques
    Fournier, Marc
    Ageron, Francois-Xavier
    Levraut, Jacques
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 24 (12) : 1441 - 1449
  • [4] Addition of dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine as an adjuvant to ketofol for deep sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Alka, Chhabra
    Sharma, Karuna
    Chaudhary, Neelam
    Dave, Milan
    Pandey, Neha
    Gupta, Sunanda
    INDIAN ANAESTHETISTS FORUM, 2022, 23 (01): : 31 - 37
  • [5] Ketofol as an Anesthetic Agent in Patients With Isolated Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective, Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial
    Maheswari, Neha
    Panda, Nidhi B.
    Mahajan, Shalvi
    Luthra, Ankur
    Pattnaik, Smita
    Bhatia, Nidhi
    Karthigeyan, Madhivanan
    Kaloria, Narender
    Chauhan, Rajeev
    Soni, Shiv
    Jangra, Kiran
    Bhagat, Hemant
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 35 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [6] Sedation with Propofol and Propofol-Ketamine (Ketofol) in Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study
    Ulutas, H.
    Ucar, M.
    Celik, M. R.
    Agar, M.
    Gulcek, I
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 26 (12) : 1817 - 1823
  • [7] Ketamine-Propofol Combination (Ketofol) Versus Propofol Alone for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial
    Andolfatto, Gary
    Abu-Laban, Riyad B.
    Zed, Peter J.
    Staniforth, Sean M.
    Stackhouse, Sherry
    Moadebi, Susanne
    Willman, Elaine
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 59 (06) : 504 - 512
  • [8] A Double Blind Randomized Trial of Ketofol Versus Propofol for Endodontic Treatment of Anxious Pediatric Patients
    Mittal, N.
    Goyal, A.
    Gauba, K.
    Kapur, A.
    Jain, K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 37 (04) : 415 - 420
  • [9] Effect of esketamine vs dexmedetomidine adjunct to propofol sedation for pediatric 3Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Xu, Shang-xian
    Shan, Xi-sheng
    Gao, Jin-meng
    Liu, Hua-xian
    Chen, Wei-rong
    Gao, Shan-shan
    Ji, Fu-hai
    Peng, Ke
    Wang, Qian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [10] Effect of esketamine vs dexmedetomidine adjunct to propofol sedation for pediatric 3Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Shang-xian Xu
    Xi-sheng Shan
    Jin-meng Gao
    Hua-xian Liu
    Wei-rong Chen
    Shan-shan Gao
    Fu-hai Ji
    Ke Peng
    Qian Wang
    European Journal of Medical Research, 27