Application of a thermal transient subsurface model to a coaxial borehole heat exchanger system

被引:2
|
作者
Abdelhafiz, Mostafa M.
Oppelt, Joachim F. [1 ]
Brenner, Gunther [2 ]
Hegele Jr, Luiz A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Future Univ Egypt, Fac Engn & Technol, Cairo 11835, Egypt
[2] Tech Univ Clausthal, Drilling Simulator Celle, D-29221 Celle, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Clausthal, ITM, Clausthal Zellerfeld, Germany
[4] Santa Catarina State Univ, Dept Petr Engn, BR-88336275 Balneario, Brazil
来源
关键词
Borehole heat exchanger; Formation modeling; Well bore thermal modeling; Numerical modeling; FINITE-ELEMENT FORMULATION; FLUID TEMPERATURE PROFILES; RESPONSE TESTS; PERFORMANCE; EXTRACTION; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211815
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
We present an application of a thermal transient model to a coaxial borehole heat exchanger system. We compare two numerical methods. First, a model with a prescribed formation temperature (PFT); secondly, a method with a modeled formation temperature (MFT). In this comparison, several parameters are analyzed, such as the transient temperature profiles, the heat flux along the wellbore, the overall heat transfer rate, the thermal conductivity of the formation, and the type of flow inside the pipe and annulus - laminar or turbulent. The description of the system by the MFT method is more physically consistent. Then we proceed validating this method against two experimental setups, thereby showing good agreement. We perform a sensitivity analysis to the MFT method, varying the direction of the flow, regular and reversed, and the center tube material, with a high (steel) or low (polyethylene) thermal conductivity. It is shown that the reverse circulation has a better heat extraction, while regular flow performs better in the case of heat injection. For the center tube material, polyethylene shows a better thermal performance when compared to steel.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Enhanced Heat Transfer Characteristics of Coaxial Borehole Heat Exchanger
    Sun, Lin
    Fu, Biwei
    Wei, Menghui
    Zhang, Si
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [22] Heat transfer analysis of a borehole heat exchanger array in a layered subsurface
    Zhang, Donghai
    Zhao, Peng
    Li, Xiaozhao
    Zhou, Yang
    Gao, Penghui
    Zhang, Ye
    Zhang, Chenyang
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 216
  • [23] Thermal performance analysis on the composition attributes of deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger for building heating
    Huang, Yibin
    Zhang, Yanjun
    Xie, Yangyang
    Zhang, Yu
    Gao, Xuefeng
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 221 (221)
  • [24] Periodic heat flux composite model for borehole heat exchanger and its application
    Lei, Fei
    Hu, Pingfang
    Zhu, Na
    Wu, Tianhua
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 151 : 132 - 142
  • [25] Thermo-economic analysis and application of medium-deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger
    Rao Z.
    Li M.
    Li M.
    Liu P.
    Zhao L.
    Lu Y.
    Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2022, 53 (12): : 4749 - 4761
  • [26] Numerical study on the heat transfer performance of coaxial shallow borehole heat exchanger
    Li G.
    Yang J.
    Zhu X.
    Shen Z.
    Energy and Built Environment, 2021, 2 (04): : 445 - 455
  • [27] Theoretical model of borehole heat exchanger
    Sliwa, T
    Gonet, A
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2005, 127 (02): : 142 - 148
  • [28] Thermal performance of a tight borehole heat exchanger
    Dehkordi, S. Emad
    Schincariol, Robert A.
    Reitsma, Stanley
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 83 : 698 - 704
  • [29] Thermal performance analysis of a deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger with a horizontal well based on a novel semi-analytical model
    Wang, Ye
    Liu, Hengjian
    Zhang, Qiqiang
    Zhang, Luyu
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2025, 239
  • [30] Experimental and analytical investigation on pipe sizes for a coaxial borehole heat exchanger
    Gordon, David
    Bolisetti, Tirupati
    Ting, David S-K.
    Reitsma, Stanley
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 115 : 946 - 953