Analysis of factors influencing the organizational capacity of Institutional Review Boards In China: a crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis based on 107 cases

被引:2
|
作者
Lu, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Shuwen [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Bojing [2 ]
Liu, Chanjuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Educ, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Inst Med Humanities, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Eye Hosp, Outpatient Dept, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Institutional Review Boards; Organizational capability; Qualitative Comparative Analysis; Influencing factors; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-023-00956-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundInstitutional Review Boards (IRBs) play a vital role in safeguarding the rights and interests of both research participants and researchers. However, China initiated the establishment of its own IRB system relatively late in comparison to international standards. Despite commendable progress, there is a pressing need to strengthen the organizational capacity building of Chinese IRBs. Hence, this study aims to analyze the key factors driving the enhancement of organizational capacity within these committees.MethodThe cross-sectional survey for this research was conducted from July 2020 to January 2022. Following the statistical grouping based on the "2020 China Health Statistical Yearbook", a systematic investigation of IRBs in various provinces of China was carried out. In-depth interviews and questionnaire surveys were conducted with the chairpersons and administrative executives (or secretaries) of highly cooperative IRBs. Subsequently, data were collected from 107 IRBs. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) was employed as the method to analyze the factors influencing the organizational capacity of medical ethics committees and explore the diverse combinations of these factors.ResultsThrough a singular necessary condition analysis, the variable "protection of rights and interests" emerges as a critical factor contributing to the robust construction of Institutional Review Boards Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). Conversely, the variables of "lack of member ability, absence of review process, and deficiency in the supervision mechanism" collectively constitute a sufficient condition leading to weaker IRB construction. The state analysis uncovers three interpretation modes: member ability-oriented (M1), system process-oriented mode (M2), and resource system-oriented mode (M3).ConclusionsThe results of this study are effectively explicable using the "Triangular Force" model proposed for the hypothesis of IRBs' organizational capacity, which provides a solid foundation for the development of organizational capabilities in IRBs. To enhance the organizational capacity of IRBs in China, it is imperative to elevate the competence of committee members and strengthen team development. This can be achieved by establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework and refining procedural protocols. Moreover, clarifying the organizational structure and optimizing resource allocation are essential steps in bolstering the overall organizational capabilities of these committees.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance Evaluation of Governance Mechanisms of Hazardous Waste Recycling in Rural China: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on Multiple Cases
    Mo, Jiapei
    Li, Gengtai
    Ai, Qishu
    Shang, Huping
    Li, Xintao
    EVALUATION REVIEW, 2024,
  • [42] Which Institutional Conditions Lead to a Successful Local Energy Transition? Applying Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to Solar PV Cases in South Korea
    Lee, Youhyun
    Kim, Bomi
    Hwang, Heeju
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (14)
  • [43] Research on Innovation Capability of Regional Innovation System Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Evidence from China
    Huang, Zhenyu
    SYSTEMS, 2022, 10 (06):
  • [44] Understanding the key factors and configurational paths of the open government data performance: Based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Zhao, Yupan
    Fan, Bo
    GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2021, 38 (03)
  • [45] Exploring configurations of social determinants for enhancing older adult health in China: an fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis based on 31 provinces in China
    Zhang, Songbiao
    Wang, Xining
    Wang, Huilin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [46] Research on the improvement path of grassroots social governance innovation performance in China--Qualitative comparative analysis based on 35 cases
    Song, Nana
    Xu, Longshun
    Chen, Xiansheng
    Xu, Huange
    Jiang, Shuoliang
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (02):
  • [47] Research on the Corporate Innovation Resilience of China Based on FGM(1,1) and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Model
    Xia, Houxue
    Jiao, Jingyao
    Wang, Pengcheng
    Tang, Xiaowei
    Xiong, Chunyan
    Wu, Liusan
    FRACTAL AND FRACTIONAL, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [48] Influencing factors of delay in seeking medical attention of patients with obstructive sleep apnea based on the Model of Pathways to Treatment in China: a qualitative analysis
    Shang, Hongyan
    Chen, Dandan
    Deng, Qingmei
    Ma, Zuchang
    SLEEP AND BREATHING, 2024, 28 (05) : 2311 - 2321
  • [49] Influence of the configuration effect of environment and organization factors on the innovation of information technology enterprises-Qualitative comparative analysis based on fuzzy set
    Qin, Yuanjian
    Yang, Jie
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 38 (06) : 6765 - 6775
  • [50] Exploring Key Factors and Driving Mechanisms of Construction Waste Recycling Development in China: Combination of PEST Model and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    Li, Jingru
    Ji, Jinxiao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (23)