Analysis of factors influencing the organizational capacity of Institutional Review Boards In China: a crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis based on 107 cases

被引:2
|
作者
Lu, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Shuwen [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Bojing [2 ]
Liu, Chanjuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Educ, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Inst Med Humanities, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Eye Hosp, Outpatient Dept, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Institutional Review Boards; Organizational capability; Qualitative Comparative Analysis; Influencing factors; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-023-00956-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundInstitutional Review Boards (IRBs) play a vital role in safeguarding the rights and interests of both research participants and researchers. However, China initiated the establishment of its own IRB system relatively late in comparison to international standards. Despite commendable progress, there is a pressing need to strengthen the organizational capacity building of Chinese IRBs. Hence, this study aims to analyze the key factors driving the enhancement of organizational capacity within these committees.MethodThe cross-sectional survey for this research was conducted from July 2020 to January 2022. Following the statistical grouping based on the "2020 China Health Statistical Yearbook", a systematic investigation of IRBs in various provinces of China was carried out. In-depth interviews and questionnaire surveys were conducted with the chairpersons and administrative executives (or secretaries) of highly cooperative IRBs. Subsequently, data were collected from 107 IRBs. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) was employed as the method to analyze the factors influencing the organizational capacity of medical ethics committees and explore the diverse combinations of these factors.ResultsThrough a singular necessary condition analysis, the variable "protection of rights and interests" emerges as a critical factor contributing to the robust construction of Institutional Review Boards Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). Conversely, the variables of "lack of member ability, absence of review process, and deficiency in the supervision mechanism" collectively constitute a sufficient condition leading to weaker IRB construction. The state analysis uncovers three interpretation modes: member ability-oriented (M1), system process-oriented mode (M2), and resource system-oriented mode (M3).ConclusionsThe results of this study are effectively explicable using the "Triangular Force" model proposed for the hypothesis of IRBs' organizational capacity, which provides a solid foundation for the development of organizational capabilities in IRBs. To enhance the organizational capacity of IRBs in China, it is imperative to elevate the competence of committee members and strengthen team development. This can be achieved by establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework and refining procedural protocols. Moreover, clarifying the organizational structure and optimizing resource allocation are essential steps in bolstering the overall organizational capabilities of these committees.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors Influencing Revenue Collection for Preventative Maintenance of Community Water Systems: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    Olaerts, Liesbet
    Walters, Jeffrey P.
    Linden, Karl G.
    Javernick-Will, Amy
    Harvey, Adam
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13):
  • [22] Exploring the multi-causes path and mechanism of "model students" in Chinese official media: A qualitative comparative analysis based on crisp set
    Cheng, Caikun
    Sun, Qinmei
    Lai, Dengxin
    Chen, Yang
    Pan, Sihan
    Che, Haoshen
    Ma, Ming
    Li, Sihan
    Liu, Yangzichun
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (09)
  • [23] Influential Pathways of Employees' Career Growth: Linkage of Psychological and Organizational Factors Based on Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    Ge, Bailin
    Ma, Zhiqiang
    Li, Mingxing
    Li, Zeyu
    Yang, Ling
    Liu, Tong
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [24] The influencing factors and pathways of China's green finance development towards the Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality -evidence from fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis based on 30 provinces of China
    Wang, Hong-sheng
    Lee, Jin-man
    Hao, Zheng
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [25] Securing a social licence for development projects: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of land expropriation cases in China
    Yang, Xiuyun
    Chen, Meng
    Chen, Qiuping
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2025, 113
  • [26] Evaluating social governance innovation policy in China: A study based on fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis
    Wu, Qi
    Cifuentes-Faura, Javier
    Li, Xuelan
    Wang, Yibo
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2024, 106
  • [27] Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to develop an absorptive capacity-based view of training
    Hernandez-Perlines, Felipe
    Moreno-Garcia, Juan
    Yanez-Araque, Benito
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (04) : 1510 - 1515
  • [28] Influencing Factors and Multiple Paths of Entrepreneurship in High-Tech Enterprises: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Configuration
    Zhang, Liyan
    Wang, Yuting
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2021, 2021
  • [29] Exploring the push-pull factors influencing parenting efficacy of fathers of children with ASD: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis
    Zhu, Linli
    Ge, Xinbin
    Huang, Weijun
    Shao, Leyi
    Ma, Xiaolan
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [30] Institutional configurations and social entrepreneurship: a country-based comparison using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Yin, Juelin
    Zhao, Jiaxin
    Du, Yunzhou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR & RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (10): : 2530 - 2550