Current Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction and the Implications of Impending Changes to Insurance Reimbursement

被引:3
|
作者
Fijany, Arman J. [1 ]
Friedlich, Nicole [2 ]
Olsson, Sofia E. [2 ]
Bishay, Anthony E. [3 ]
Pekarev, Maxim [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Texas Christian Univ, Anne Burnett Mar Sch Med, Ft Worth, TX USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Neurosurg, Sch Med, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
socioeconomic disparities; insurance reimbursement; s-codes; diep flap; autologous breast reconstruction;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.43855
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In 2019, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) combined all autologous breast flap procedures under one billing code, effective from December 31, 2024. This change will result in equal insurance reimbursement rates for popular flap options, such as transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, which were previously billed separately using S-codes based on complexity. Methods This study aimed to analyze insurance code changes for autologous breast reconstruction flap procedures. Data were collected from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' annual plastic surgery statistics reports, including specific insurance codes and case volumes from 2007 to 2020. A comprehensive analysis was conducted to assess recent trends in flap utilization rates, documenting any modifications or additions to the existing codes and their implementation years. Results The study analyzed billing codes and case volumes for autologous breast reconstruction procedures, with a focus on the DIEP flap and other alternatives. Non-autologous breast reconstruction procedures showed consistently higher case volumes compared to autologous procedures from 2007 to 2020. Notably, the popularity of the DIEP flap surpassed that of other flap options after 2011. Conclusion The removal of S-codes for autologous breast reconstruction by CMS and the subsequent potential decrease in insurance coverage for the DIEP flap may lead to a decrease in its utilization and a shift toward more invasive options, like the TRAM flap. This change could result in financial burdens for patients and widen socioeconomic disparities in breast reconstruction, limiting access to preferred reconstructive methods and impacting patient autonomy and overall well-being.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current status of and trends in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in Korea
    Song, Woo Jin
    Kang, Sang Gue
    Kim, Eun Key
    Song, Seung Yong
    Lee, Joon Seok
    Lee, Jung Ho
    Jin, Ung Sik
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2020, 47 (02): : 118 - 125
  • [42] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-based versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Mandelbaum, Ava
    Thompson, Carlie
    Attai, Deanna
    Baker, Jennifer
    Slack, Ginger
    Dinome, Maggie
    Benharash, Peyman
    Lee, Minna
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S523 - S524
  • [43] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Ava D. Mandelbaum
    Carlie K. Thompson
    Deanna J. Attai
    Jennifer L. Baker
    Ginger Slack
    Maggie L. DiNome
    Peyman Benharash
    Minna K. Lee
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 4777 - 4785
  • [44] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Mandelbaum, Ava D.
    Thompson, Carlie K.
    Attai, Deanna J.
    Baker, Jennifer L.
    Slack, Ginger
    DiNome, Maggie L.
    Benharash, Peyman
    Lee, Minna K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (12) : 4777 - 4785
  • [45] Current status of autologous breast reconstruction in Europe: how to reduce donor site morbidity
    Hamdi, Moustapha
    Kapila, Ayush K.
    Waked, Karl
    GLAND SURGERY, 2023, 12 (12) : 1760 - 1773
  • [46] Impact of Insurance, Hospital Type, and Sociodemographic Factors on Breast Reconstruction Rates: A Look at National Trends
    Musavi, Leila
    Sarmiento, Samuel
    Sacks, Justin M.
    Aliu, Oluseyi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 227 (04) : S34 - S35
  • [47] Recommendations on breast cancer screening and prevention in the context of implementing risk stratification: impending changes to current policies
    Gagnon, J.
    Levesque, E.
    Borduas, F.
    Chiquette, J.
    Diorio, C.
    Duchesne, N.
    Dumais, M.
    Eloy, L.
    Foulkes, W.
    Gervais, N.
    Lalonde, L.
    L'Esperance, B.
    Meterissian, S.
    Provencher, L.
    Richard, J.
    Savard, C.
    Trop, I.
    Wong, N.
    Knoppers, B. M.
    Simard, J.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (06) : E615 - E625
  • [48] Current Trends in Breast Reconstruction Survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010
    Gurunluoglu, Raffi
    Gurunluoglu, Aslin
    Williams, Susan A.
    Tebockhorst, Seth
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 70 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [49] Changes in Spinal Alignment of Women Who Underwent Unilateral Mastectomy with Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction Compared To Mastectomy without Breast Reconstruction
    Heng, Sophia Si Ling
    Gan, Yin Hui
    Yahya, Maya Mazuwin
    Haron, Juhara
    Sulaiman, Wan Azman Wan
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2022, 22 (08) : E863 - E873
  • [50] Social Determinants of Health and Patient-reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction, Using Insurance as a Proxy
    Plotsker, Ethan L.
    Graziano, Francis D.
    Kim, Minji
    Boe, Lillian A.
    Tadros, Audree B.
    Matros, Evan
    Azoury, Said C.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2025, 41 (01) : 9 - 18