Would you do it again? Discrepancies between patient and surgeon perceptions following adult spine deformity surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Bess, Shay [1 ,2 ,15 ]
Line, Breton [1 ,2 ]
Ames, Christopher [3 ]
Burton, Douglas [4 ]
Mundis, Gregory [5 ]
Eastlack, Robert [5 ]
Hart, Robert [6 ]
Gupta, Munish [7 ]
Klineberg, Eric [8 ]
Kim, Han Jo [9 ]
Hostin, Richard [10 ]
Kebaish, Khaled [11 ]
Lafage, Virgine [12 ]
Lafage, Renaud [12 ]
Schwab, Frank [12 ]
Shaffrey, Christopher [13 ]
Smith, Justin S. [14 ]
机构
[1] Rocky Mt Hosp Children, Denver Int Spine Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[2] Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Presbyterian St, Denver, CO USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Kansas City, KS USA
[5] San Diego Ctr Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA USA
[6] Swedish Neurosci Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Washington Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[8] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Sacramento, CA USA
[9] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY USA
[10] Southwest Scoliosis Inst, Plano, TX USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[12] Lenox Hill Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY USA
[13] Duke Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[14] Univ Virginia, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
[15] Denver Int Spine Ctr, 1601 East 19th Ave, Suite 6250, Denver, CO 80218 USA
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2023年 / 23卷 / 08期
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; Complications; Patient perception; Patient reported outcomes; Satisfaction; Surgery; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; OUTCOMES; HEALTH; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery can improve patient pain and physical function but is associated with high complication rates and long postoperative recovery. Accord-ingly, if given a choice, patients may indicate they would not undergo ASD surgery again. PURPOSE: Evaluate surgically treated ASD patients to assess if given the option (1) would surgi-cally treated ASD patients choose to undergo the same ASD surgery again, (2) would the treating surgeon perform the same ASD surgery again and if not why, (3) evaluate for consensus and/or dis-crepancies between patient and surgeon opinions for willingness to perform/receive the same sur-gery, and (4) evaluate for associations with willingness to undergo or not undergo the same surgery again and patient demographics, patient reported outcomes, and postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective ASD study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Surgically treated ASD patients enrolled into a multicenter prospective study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire (SRS-22r), Short Form -36v2 questionnaire (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric pain rating for back pain (NRS back) and leg pain (NRS leg), minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for SRS-22r domains and ODI, intraoperative and postoperative complications, surgeon and patient satisfaction with surgery. METHODS: Surgically treated ASD patients prospectively enrolled into a multicenter study were asked at minimum 2-year postoperative, if, based upon their hospital and surgical experiences and surgical recovery experiences, would the patient undergo the same surgery again. Treating sur-geons were then matched to their corresponding patients, blinded to the patients' preoperative and postoperative patient reported outcome measures, and interviewed and asked if (1) the surgeon believed that the corresponding patient would undergo the surgery again, (2) if the surgeon believed the corresponding patient was improved by the surgery and (3) if the surgeon would per-form the same surgery on the corresponding patient again, and if not why. ASD patients were divided into those indicating they would (YES), would not (NO) or were unsure (UNSURE) if they would have same surgery again. Agreement between patient and surgeon willingness to receive/ perform the same surgery was assessed and correlations between patient willingness for same sur-gery, postoperative complications, spine deformity correction, patient reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: A total of 580 of 961 ASD patients eligible for study were evaluated. YES (n=472) had sim-ilar surgical procedures performed, similar duration of hospital and ICU stay, similar spine deformity cor-rection and similar postoperative spinal alignment as NO (n=29; p>.05). UNSURE (n=79) had greater preoperative depression and opioid use rates, UNSURE and NO had more postoperative complications requiring surgery, and UNSURE and NO had fewer percentages of patients reaching postoperative MCID for SRS-22r domains and MCID for ODI than YES (p<.05). Comparison of patient willingness to receive the same surgery versus surgeon perceptions on patient's willingness to receive the same surgery demonstrated surgeons accurately identified YES (91.1%) but poorly identified NO (13.8%; p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: If given a choice, 18.6% of surgically treated ASD patients indicated they were unsure or would not undergo the surgery again. ASD patients indicating they were unsure or would not undergo ASD surgery again had greater preoperative depression, greater preoperative opioid use, worse postoperative PROs, fewer patients reaching MCID, more complications requiring surgery, and greater postoperative opioid use. Additionally, patients that indicated they would not have the same surgery again were poorly identified by their treating surgeons compared to patients indicating they would be willing to receive the same surgery again. More research is needed to understand patient expectations and improve patient experiences following ASD surgery. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1126
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Opioid use prior to surgery is associated with worse preoperative and postoperative patient reported quality of life and decreased surgical cost effectiveness for symptomatic adult spine deformity; A matched cohort analysis
    Linea, Breton
    Bessa, Shay
    Gum, Jeffrey L.
    Hostin, Richard
    Kebaish, Khaled
    Ames, Christopher
    Burton, Douglas
    Mundis, Gregory
    Eastlack, Robert
    Gupta, Munish
    Klinebergi, Eric
    Lafagej, Virgine
    Lafagej, Renaud
    Schwabj, Frank
    Shaffreyk, Christopher
    Smith, Justin S.
    NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2022, 9
  • [42] Improvement in Back and Leg Pain and Disability Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Study of 324 Patients With 2-year Follow-up and the Impact of Surgery on Patient-reported Outcomes
    Verma, Ravi
    Lafage, Renaud
    Scheer, Justin
    Smith, Justin
    Passias, Peter
    Hostin, Richard
    Ames, Christopher
    Mundis, Gregory
    Burton, Douglas
    Kim, Han Jo
    Bess, Shay
    Klineberg, Eric
    Schwab, Frank
    Lafage, Virginie
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (04) : 263 - 269
  • [43] Commentary: Reoperation following strabismus surgery among Medicare beneficiaries: Associations with geographic region, academic affiliation, surgeon volume, and adjustable suture technique - Operations again! What lessons do we gain?
    Sharma, Pradeep
    Gaur, Nripen
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 66 (08) : 1154 - 1155
  • [44] Response to Letter to the Editor on "Critical Analysis of Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcome Following Anterior/Posterior Staged Versus Same Day Surgery in Patients Undergoing Identical Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity"
    Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O.
    Monas, Arie
    Yung, Anthony
    Fisher, Max R.
    Das, Ankita
    Cottrill, Ethan J.
    Prado, Isabel P.
    Wu, Caroline M.
    Passias, Peter G.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (24) : E426 - E427
  • [45] Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?
    Passfall, Lara
    Williamson, Tyler K.
    Krol, Oscar
    Lebovic, Jordan
    Imbo, Bailey
    Joujon-Roche, Rachel
    Tretiakov, Peter
    Dangas, Katerina
    Owusu-Sarpong, Stephane
    Koller, Heiko
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    Vira, Shaleen
    Lafage, Renaud
    Lafage, Virginie
    Passias, Peter G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 37 (03) : 368 - 375
  • [46] One-stage combined approach en bloc vertebrectomy for primary Ewing's sarcoma of mobile spine in an adult patient: 3 years following aggressive surgery for a rare entity
    Gharbi, Mohamed Amine
    Chahed, Houssem Eddine
    Ben Slama, Sana
    Teborbi, Anis
    Bouzidi, Ramzi
    Nefiss, Mouadh
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2023, 11 (11):
  • [47] Letter to the Editor concerning "Does the use of postoperative brace help preventing mechanical complications following adult deformity surgery?" by J. Pizones et al. (Eur Spine J [2023]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07521-3)
    Kumar, Vishal
    Kumar, Aman
    Barik, Sitanshu
    Raj, Vikash
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (08) : 2932 - 2933
  • [48] Letter to the Editor concerning “Does the use of postoperative brace help preventing mechanical complications following adult deformity surgery?” by J. Pizones et al. (Eur Spine J [2023]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-022–07521-3)
    Vishal Kumar
    Aman Kumar
    Sitanshu Barik
    Vikash Raj
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 2932 - 2933
  • [49] Answer to the Letter to the Editor of V. Kumar et al. concerning “Does the use of postoperative brace help preventing mechanical complications following adult deformity surgery?” by J. Pizones et al. (Eur Spine J [2023]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07521-3)
    Javier Pizones
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 2934 - 2935
  • [50] Answer to the Letter to the Editor of V. Kumar et al. concerning "Does the use of postoperative brace help preventing mechanical complications following adult deformity surgery?" by J. Pizones et al. (Eur Spine J [2023]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07521-3)
    Pizones, Javier
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (08) : 2934 - 2935