Would you do it again? Discrepancies between patient and surgeon perceptions following adult spine deformity surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Bess, Shay [1 ,2 ,15 ]
Line, Breton [1 ,2 ]
Ames, Christopher [3 ]
Burton, Douglas [4 ]
Mundis, Gregory [5 ]
Eastlack, Robert [5 ]
Hart, Robert [6 ]
Gupta, Munish [7 ]
Klineberg, Eric [8 ]
Kim, Han Jo [9 ]
Hostin, Richard [10 ]
Kebaish, Khaled [11 ]
Lafage, Virgine [12 ]
Lafage, Renaud [12 ]
Schwab, Frank [12 ]
Shaffrey, Christopher [13 ]
Smith, Justin S. [14 ]
机构
[1] Rocky Mt Hosp Children, Denver Int Spine Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[2] Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Presbyterian St, Denver, CO USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Kansas City, KS USA
[5] San Diego Ctr Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA USA
[6] Swedish Neurosci Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Washington Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[8] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Sacramento, CA USA
[9] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY USA
[10] Southwest Scoliosis Inst, Plano, TX USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[12] Lenox Hill Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY USA
[13] Duke Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[14] Univ Virginia, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
[15] Denver Int Spine Ctr, 1601 East 19th Ave, Suite 6250, Denver, CO 80218 USA
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2023年 / 23卷 / 08期
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; Complications; Patient perception; Patient reported outcomes; Satisfaction; Surgery; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; OUTCOMES; HEALTH; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery can improve patient pain and physical function but is associated with high complication rates and long postoperative recovery. Accord-ingly, if given a choice, patients may indicate they would not undergo ASD surgery again. PURPOSE: Evaluate surgically treated ASD patients to assess if given the option (1) would surgi-cally treated ASD patients choose to undergo the same ASD surgery again, (2) would the treating surgeon perform the same ASD surgery again and if not why, (3) evaluate for consensus and/or dis-crepancies between patient and surgeon opinions for willingness to perform/receive the same sur-gery, and (4) evaluate for associations with willingness to undergo or not undergo the same surgery again and patient demographics, patient reported outcomes, and postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective ASD study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Surgically treated ASD patients enrolled into a multicenter prospective study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire (SRS-22r), Short Form -36v2 questionnaire (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric pain rating for back pain (NRS back) and leg pain (NRS leg), minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for SRS-22r domains and ODI, intraoperative and postoperative complications, surgeon and patient satisfaction with surgery. METHODS: Surgically treated ASD patients prospectively enrolled into a multicenter study were asked at minimum 2-year postoperative, if, based upon their hospital and surgical experiences and surgical recovery experiences, would the patient undergo the same surgery again. Treating sur-geons were then matched to their corresponding patients, blinded to the patients' preoperative and postoperative patient reported outcome measures, and interviewed and asked if (1) the surgeon believed that the corresponding patient would undergo the surgery again, (2) if the surgeon believed the corresponding patient was improved by the surgery and (3) if the surgeon would per-form the same surgery on the corresponding patient again, and if not why. ASD patients were divided into those indicating they would (YES), would not (NO) or were unsure (UNSURE) if they would have same surgery again. Agreement between patient and surgeon willingness to receive/ perform the same surgery was assessed and correlations between patient willingness for same sur-gery, postoperative complications, spine deformity correction, patient reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: A total of 580 of 961 ASD patients eligible for study were evaluated. YES (n=472) had sim-ilar surgical procedures performed, similar duration of hospital and ICU stay, similar spine deformity cor-rection and similar postoperative spinal alignment as NO (n=29; p>.05). UNSURE (n=79) had greater preoperative depression and opioid use rates, UNSURE and NO had more postoperative complications requiring surgery, and UNSURE and NO had fewer percentages of patients reaching postoperative MCID for SRS-22r domains and MCID for ODI than YES (p<.05). Comparison of patient willingness to receive the same surgery versus surgeon perceptions on patient's willingness to receive the same surgery demonstrated surgeons accurately identified YES (91.1%) but poorly identified NO (13.8%; p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: If given a choice, 18.6% of surgically treated ASD patients indicated they were unsure or would not undergo the surgery again. ASD patients indicating they were unsure or would not undergo ASD surgery again had greater preoperative depression, greater preoperative opioid use, worse postoperative PROs, fewer patients reaching MCID, more complications requiring surgery, and greater postoperative opioid use. Additionally, patients that indicated they would not have the same surgery again were poorly identified by their treating surgeons compared to patients indicating they would be willing to receive the same surgery again. More research is needed to understand patient expectations and improve patient experiences following ASD surgery. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1126
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Impact of Neuroanesthesia Fellowship Training and Anesthesiologist-Surgeon Dyad Volume on Patient Outcomes in Adult Spine Surgery: A Population-Based Study
    Chui, Jason
    Ng, Wai
    Yang, Victor
    Duggal, Neil
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 37 (02) : 206 - 215
  • [32] Do Newly Proposed Realignment Targets Bridge the Gap Between Radiographic and Clinical Success in Adult Cervical Deformity Corrective Surgery
    Pierce, Katherine
    Ahmad, Waleed
    Naessig, Sara
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    Passias, Peter
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 67 : 249 - 249
  • [33] Do the newly proposed realignment targets bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in adult cervical deformity corrective surgery
    Pierce, Katherine E.
    Krol, Oscar
    Lebovic, Jordan
    Kummer, Nicholas
    Passfall, Lara
    Ahmad, Waleed
    Naessig, Sara
    Diebo, Bassel
    Passias, Peter Gust
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2022, 13 (01): : 67 - 71
  • [34] Postoperative Discharge to Acute Rehabilitation or Skilled Nursing Facility Compared With Home Does Not Reduce Hospital Readmissions, Return to Surgery, or Improve Outcomes Following Adult Spine Deformity Surgery
    Bess, Shay
    Line, Breton G.
    Nunley, Pierce
    Ames, Christopher
    Burton, Douglas
    Mundis, Gregory
    Eastlack, Robert
    Hart, Robert
    Gupta, Munish
    Klineberg, Eric
    Kim, Han Jo
    Kelly, Michael
    Hostin, Richard
    Kebaish, Khaled
    Lafage, Virgine
    Lafage, Renaud
    Schwab, Frank
    Shaffrey, Christopher
    Smith, Justin S.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (09) : E117 - E127
  • [35] Variation between surgeons in reoperation rates following vertical strabismus surgery: Associations with patient and surgeon characteristics and adjustable sutures
    Leffler, Christopher T.
    Woock, Alicia
    Shinbashi, Meagan
    Suggs, Melissa
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (11):
  • [36] Fragility of L5 Vertebral Fracture After Rod Fracture at the Lumbosacral Junction Following Long-Segment Spinal Fusion Surgery for Adult Spine Deformity
    Okuwaki, Shun
    Funayama, Toru
    Fujii, Kengo
    Tatsumura, Masaki
    Yamazaki, Masashi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [37] Hospital Readmission Within 2 Years Following Adult Thoracolumbar Spinal Deformity Surgery: Prevalence, Predictors, and Effect on Patient-derived Outcome Measures
    Passias, Peter G.
    Klineberg, Eric O.
    Jalai, Cyrus M.
    Worley, Nancy
    Poorman, Gregory W.
    Line, Breton
    Oh, Cheongeun
    Burton, Douglas C.
    Kim, Han Jo
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Ames, Christopher P.
    Smith, Justin S.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Lafage, Virginie
    Bess, Shay
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (17) : 1355 - 1364
  • [38] Correlation Between Postoperative Distribution of Lordosis and Reciprocal Progression of Thoracic Kyphosis and Occurrence of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Ohba, Tetsuro
    Ebata, Shigeto
    Oba, Hiroki
    Koyama, Kensuke
    Haro, Hirotaka
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (09): : E466 - E472
  • [39] Critical Analysis of Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcome Following Anterior/Posterior Staged Versus Same Day Surgery in Patients Undergoing Identical Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Haraguchi, Yuki
    Morimoto, Tadatsugu
    Hirata, Hirohito
    Mawatari, Masaaki
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (11) : E173 - E173
  • [40] Critical Analysis of Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior/Posterior Staged Versus Same-Day Surgery in Patients Undergoing Identical Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Passias, Peter G.
    Ahmad, Waleed
    Tretiakov, Peter S.
    Lafage, Renaud
    Lafage, Virginie
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Line, Breton
    Daniels, Alan
    Mir, Jamshaid M.
    Gupta, Munish
    Mundis, Gregory
    Eastlack, Robert
    Nunley, Pierce
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Hostin, Richard
    Hart, Robert
    Burton, Douglas C.
    Shaffrey, Christopher
    Schwab, Frank
    Ames, Christopher
    Smith, Justin S.
    Bess, Shay
    Klineberg, Eric O.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (13) : 893 - 901