Would you do it again? Discrepancies between patient and surgeon perceptions following adult spine deformity surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Bess, Shay [1 ,2 ,15 ]
Line, Breton [1 ,2 ]
Ames, Christopher [3 ]
Burton, Douglas [4 ]
Mundis, Gregory [5 ]
Eastlack, Robert [5 ]
Hart, Robert [6 ]
Gupta, Munish [7 ]
Klineberg, Eric [8 ]
Kim, Han Jo [9 ]
Hostin, Richard [10 ]
Kebaish, Khaled [11 ]
Lafage, Virgine [12 ]
Lafage, Renaud [12 ]
Schwab, Frank [12 ]
Shaffrey, Christopher [13 ]
Smith, Justin S. [14 ]
机构
[1] Rocky Mt Hosp Children, Denver Int Spine Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[2] Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Presbyterian St, Denver, CO USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Kansas City, KS USA
[5] San Diego Ctr Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA USA
[6] Swedish Neurosci Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Washington Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[8] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Sacramento, CA USA
[9] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY USA
[10] Southwest Scoliosis Inst, Plano, TX USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[12] Lenox Hill Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY USA
[13] Duke Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[14] Univ Virginia, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
[15] Denver Int Spine Ctr, 1601 East 19th Ave, Suite 6250, Denver, CO 80218 USA
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2023年 / 23卷 / 08期
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; Complications; Patient perception; Patient reported outcomes; Satisfaction; Surgery; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; OUTCOMES; HEALTH; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery can improve patient pain and physical function but is associated with high complication rates and long postoperative recovery. Accord-ingly, if given a choice, patients may indicate they would not undergo ASD surgery again. PURPOSE: Evaluate surgically treated ASD patients to assess if given the option (1) would surgi-cally treated ASD patients choose to undergo the same ASD surgery again, (2) would the treating surgeon perform the same ASD surgery again and if not why, (3) evaluate for consensus and/or dis-crepancies between patient and surgeon opinions for willingness to perform/receive the same sur-gery, and (4) evaluate for associations with willingness to undergo or not undergo the same surgery again and patient demographics, patient reported outcomes, and postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective ASD study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Surgically treated ASD patients enrolled into a multicenter prospective study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire (SRS-22r), Short Form -36v2 questionnaire (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric pain rating for back pain (NRS back) and leg pain (NRS leg), minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for SRS-22r domains and ODI, intraoperative and postoperative complications, surgeon and patient satisfaction with surgery. METHODS: Surgically treated ASD patients prospectively enrolled into a multicenter study were asked at minimum 2-year postoperative, if, based upon their hospital and surgical experiences and surgical recovery experiences, would the patient undergo the same surgery again. Treating sur-geons were then matched to their corresponding patients, blinded to the patients' preoperative and postoperative patient reported outcome measures, and interviewed and asked if (1) the surgeon believed that the corresponding patient would undergo the surgery again, (2) if the surgeon believed the corresponding patient was improved by the surgery and (3) if the surgeon would per-form the same surgery on the corresponding patient again, and if not why. ASD patients were divided into those indicating they would (YES), would not (NO) or were unsure (UNSURE) if they would have same surgery again. Agreement between patient and surgeon willingness to receive/ perform the same surgery was assessed and correlations between patient willingness for same sur-gery, postoperative complications, spine deformity correction, patient reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: A total of 580 of 961 ASD patients eligible for study were evaluated. YES (n=472) had sim-ilar surgical procedures performed, similar duration of hospital and ICU stay, similar spine deformity cor-rection and similar postoperative spinal alignment as NO (n=29; p>.05). UNSURE (n=79) had greater preoperative depression and opioid use rates, UNSURE and NO had more postoperative complications requiring surgery, and UNSURE and NO had fewer percentages of patients reaching postoperative MCID for SRS-22r domains and MCID for ODI than YES (p<.05). Comparison of patient willingness to receive the same surgery versus surgeon perceptions on patient's willingness to receive the same surgery demonstrated surgeons accurately identified YES (91.1%) but poorly identified NO (13.8%; p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: If given a choice, 18.6% of surgically treated ASD patients indicated they were unsure or would not undergo the surgery again. ASD patients indicating they were unsure or would not undergo ASD surgery again had greater preoperative depression, greater preoperative opioid use, worse postoperative PROs, fewer patients reaching MCID, more complications requiring surgery, and greater postoperative opioid use. Additionally, patients that indicated they would not have the same surgery again were poorly identified by their treating surgeons compared to patients indicating they would be willing to receive the same surgery again. More research is needed to understand patient expectations and improve patient experiences following ASD surgery. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1126
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What if You Could Treat the Same Patient Again, Would You do the Exact Same Spine Surgery? A Multi-Surgeon Survey of Their Own Revisions
    Sheehan, Connor
    Mohamed, Ayman
    Schwab, Frank
    Burton, Douglas
    Okonkwo, David
    Eastlack, Robert
    Kim, Han J.
    Klineberg, Eric
    Hamilton, KoJo
    Bess, Shay
    Lafage, Renaud
    Lafage, Virginie
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [2] Comparison of Patient and Surgeon Perceptions of Adverse Events After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Hart, Robert A.
    Cabalo, Adam
    Bess, Shay
    Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
    Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba
    Burton, Douglas
    Cunningham, Matthew E.
    Gupta, Munish
    Hostin, Richard
    Kebaish, Khaled
    Klineberg, Eric
    Mundis, Gregory
    Shaffrey, Christopher
    Smith, Justin S.
    Wood, Kirkham
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (09) : 732 - 736
  • [3] Patient and Spine Surgeon Perceptions on Shared Decision Making in the Treatment of Older Adults Undergoing Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Perera, Anjali
    Deme, Palvasha
    Chilakapati, Sai
    Caruso, James
    Singh, Ravinderjit
    Eldridge, Cody
    Aoun, Salah
    Makris, Una
    Stutzman, Sonja
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 135 (02) : 57 - 57
  • [4] Patient and Spine Surgeon Perceptions on Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Older Adults Undergoing Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Deme, Palvasha
    Perera, Anjali
    Chilakapati, Sai
    Stutzman, Sonja
    Singh, Ravinderjit
    Eldridge, Cody M.
    Caruso, James
    Vira, Shaleen
    Aoun, Salah G.
    Makris, Una E.
    Bagley, Carlos A.
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (10) : 730 - 736
  • [5] The gap between surgeon goal and achieved sagittal alignment in adult cervical spine deformity surgery
    Smith, Justin S.
    Ben-Israel, David
    Kelly, Michael P.
    Lafage, Virginie
    Lafage, Renaud
    Klineberg, Eric O.
    Kim, Han Jo
    Line, Breton
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
    Passias, Peter
    Eastlack, Robert K.
    Mundis Jr, Gregory M.
    Riew, K. Daniel
    Kebaish, Khaled
    Park, Paul
    Gupta, Munish C.
    Gum, Jeffrey L.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    Hostin, Richard
    Scheer, Justin K.
    Soroceanu, Alex
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Buell, Thomas J.
    Lewis, Stephen J.
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    Schwab, Frank J.
    Burton, Douglas
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Ames, Christopher P.
    Bess, Shay
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2025, 42 (03) : 309 - 319
  • [6] Surgeon experience influences patient characteristics and outcomes in spine deformity surgery
    Schupper, Alexander J.
    Neifert, Sean N.
    Martini, Michael L.
    Gal, Jonathan S.
    Yuk, Frank J.
    Caridi, John M.
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2021, 9 (02) : 341 - 348
  • [7] Surgeon experience influences patient characteristics and outcomes in spine deformity surgery
    Alexander J. Schupper
    Sean N. Neifert
    Michael L. Martini
    Jonathan S. Gal
    Frank J. Yuk
    John M. Caridi
    Spine Deformity, 2021, 9 : 341 - 348
  • [8] Adult spine deformity surgery—what do we miss?
    Vitor Castro
    Manuel Cunha e Sá
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2020, 162 : 1389 - 1391
  • [9] Adult spine deformity surgery-what do we miss?
    Castro, Vitor
    Cunha e Sa, Manuel
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2020, 162 (06) : 1389 - 1391
  • [10] The association between locomotive function and incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spine deformity surgery
    Kwon, Ohsang
    Lee, Sanghoon
    Zheng, Haolin
    Ham, Dae-Woong
    Bang, Chungwon
    Park, Sang-Min
    Yeom, Jin S.
    Kim, Ho-Joong
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)