Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model

被引:6
|
作者
Bisson, Mathieu [1 ]
Aubrey-Bassler, Kris [2 ]
Chouinard, Maud-Christine [3 ]
Doucet, Shelley [4 ]
Ramsden, Vivian R. [5 ]
Dumont-Samson, Olivier [1 ]
Howse, Dana [2 ]
Lambert, Mireille [1 ]
Schwarz, Charlotte [4 ]
Luke, Alison [4 ]
Rabbitskin, Norma
Gaudreau, Andre
Porter, Jude
Rubenstein, Donna
Taylor, Jennifer
Warren, Mike
Hudon, Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Med Famille & Med Urgence, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[2] Mem Univ, Fac Med, Primary Healthcare Res Unit, St John, NF, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Nursing, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Nursing & Hlth Sci, Fredericton, NB, Canada
[5] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Acad Family Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
health implementation research; logic model; patient engagement; patient involvement; patient partnership in research; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; CARE RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13782
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionGrowing evidence supports patient engagement (PE) in health implementation research to improve the quality, relevance and uptake of research. However, more guidance is needed to plan and operationalize PE before and throughout the research process. The aim of the study was to develop a logic model illustrating the causal links between context, resources, activities, outcomes and impact of PE in an implementation research programme. MethodsThe Patient Engagement in Health Implementation Research Logic Model (hereafter the Logic Model) was developed using a descriptive qualitative design with a participatory approach, in the context of the PriCARE programme. This programme aims to implement and evaluate case management for individuals who frequently use healthcare services in primary care clinics across five Canadian provinces. Participant observation of team meetings was performed by all team members involved in the programme and in-depth interviews were conducted by two external research assistants with team members (n = 22). A deductive thematic analysis using components of logic models as coding categories was conducted. Data were pooled in the first version of the Logic Model, which was refined in research team meetings with patient partners. The final version was validated by all team members. ResultsThe Logic Model highlights the importance of integrating PE into the project before its commencement, with appropriate support in terms of funding and time allocation. The governance structure and leadership of both principal investigators and patient partners have significant effects on PE activities and outcomes. As an empirical and standardized illustration that facilitates a shared understanding, the Logic Model provides guidance for maximizing the impact of patient partnership in various contexts for research, patients, providers and health care. ConclusionThe Logic Model will help academic researchers, decision makers and patient partners plan, operationalize, and assess PE in implementation research for optimal outcomes. Patient or Public ContributionPatient partners from the PriCARE research programme contributed to developing the research objectives and designing, developing and validating data collection tools, producing data, developing and validating the Logic Model and reviewing the manuscript.
引用
收藏
页码:1854 / 1862
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research
    Danielle E. Rolfe
    Vivian R. Ramsden
    Davina Banner
    Ian D. Graham
    [J]. Research Involvement and Engagement, 4 (1)
  • [32] Scoping review of models and frameworks of patient engagement in health services research
    Chudyk, Anna Maria
    Horrill, Tara
    Waldman, Celeste
    Demczuk, Lisa
    Shimmin, Carolyn
    Stoddard, Roger
    Hickes, Serena
    Schultz, Annette S. H.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [33] Addressing Ethical Challenges Related to Community and Patient Engagement in Health Research
    Cordeaux, Emily
    Sheikhan, Natasha Yasmin
    Boateng, Rhonda
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BIOETHIQUE, 2024, 7 (2-3):
  • [34] The Impact of Patient and Family Engagement in Child Health Research: A Scoping Review
    Vanderhout, Shelley M.
    Bhalla, Manav
    Van, Alicia
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Potter, Beth K.
    Karoly, Aliza
    Ly, Valentina
    Macarthur, Colin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2023, 253 : 115 - 128
  • [35] Does engagement matter? The impact of patient and community engagement on implementation of cardiovascular health materials in primary care settings
    Zittleman, Linda
    Westfall, John M.
    Callen, Danelle
    Herrick, Alisha M.
    Nkouaga, Carolina
    Simpson, Matthew
    Dickinson, L. Miriam
    Fernald, Douglas
    Kaufman, Arthur
    English, Aimee F.
    Dickinson, W. Perry
    Nease Jr, Donald E.
    [J]. BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [36] PATIENT ENGAGEMENT FOR SLEEP RESEARCH
    Seeger-Zybok, R. K.
    Leary, E. B.
    Kushida, C. A.
    Mignot, E.
    [J]. SLEEP, 2018, 41 : A390 - A391
  • [37] Patient Engagement in the Research Process
    Duffy, L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2015, 78 : S225 - S225
  • [38] Crowdsourcing and patient engagement in research
    Hogg, William E.
    [J]. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2015, 61 (03) : 283 - 284
  • [39] Spotlight on the Patient Health Engagement model (PHE model): a psychosocial theory to understand people's meaningful engagement in their own health care
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    Barello, Serena
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2018, 12 : 1261 - 1271
  • [40] Facilitating implementation of medication reviews in the community pharmacy setting: an application of the Implementation Research Logic Model
    Michel, Dorothee E.
    Tonna, Antonella P.
    Dartsch, Dorothee C.
    Weidmann, Anita E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (02) : 520 - 521