In Vivo and In Vitro Accuracy Analysis of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in an Edentulous Patient

被引:1
|
作者
Makarov, Nikolay [1 ]
Papi, Piero [1 ]
Santomauro, Vincenzo [2 ]
Di Carlo, Gabriele [1 ]
Polimeni, Antonella [1 ]
Di Murro, Bianca [1 ]
Saccucci, Matteo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Oral & Maxillo Facial Sci, Via Caserta 6, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Via Roma 103, I-84091 Battipaglia, Italy
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
CAD-CAM; surgery; computer-assisted; dental implants; printing; three-dimensional; TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS; PLACEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS; DENTISTRY; CAD/CAM; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/app13021185
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Background: Recently, intraoral scanning (IOS) has been proposed as a new tool to evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS); however, further research is needed to improve the precision of IOS for full-arch impressions. The purpose of the study was to assess the accuracy of s-CAIS in an edentulous patient either in vivo or in vitro with two different evaluation techniques and to investigate if their results are comparable. Methods: A patient with terminal dentition was selected and four implants were placed using s-CAIS with a bone-supported stackable template. Segmentation used for designing a template was 3D printed, and then four implants were placed in the model following the same protocol as for s-CAIS. The model then underwent cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and laboratory scanning to evaluate its accuracy. Data were uploaded to specific software, and accuracy values were automatically generated. Results: A statistical analysis was not attempted since all measurements were performed on the same patient and model. When descriptively comparing the accuracy of the two methods of treatment evaluation in the in vitro scenario, comparable results were obtained between IOS and CBCT, except for the angle. Conclusions: As the intraoral scanning procedure in fully edentulous patients is not yet clinically validated, utilizing CBCT can still be recommended for the accurate evaluation of computer-assisted implant placement.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does a fully digital workflow improve the accuracy of computer-assisted implant surgery in partially edentulous patients? A systematic review of clinical trials
    Siqueira, Rafael
    Chen, Zhaozhao
    Galli, Matthew
    Saleh, Islam
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Chan, Hsun-Liang
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (06) : 660 - 671
  • [32] The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery
    El Kholy, Karim
    Janner, Simone F. M.
    Schimmel, Martin
    Buser, Daniel
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (01) : 101 - 107
  • [33] The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial
    Kaewsiri, Dechawat
    Panmekiate, Soontra
    Subbalekha, Keskanya
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (06) : 505 - 514
  • [34] COMPUTER-ASSISTED DENTAL IMPLANT-SURGERY
    FORTIN, T
    LAIR, JM
    COUDERT, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 932 - 932
  • [35] Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study
    Shusterman, Ariel
    Nashef, Rizan
    Tecco, Simona
    Mangano, Carlo
    Lerner, Henriette
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [36] Computer-assisted flapless implant surgery in edentulous elderly patients: A 2-year follow up
    di Torresanto, Vincenzo Mirisola
    Milinkovic, Iva
    Torsello, Ferruccio
    Cordaro, Luca
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 45 (05): : 419 - 429
  • [37] Accuracy of computer-assisted implant placement with insertion templates
    Naziri, Eleni
    Schramm, Alexander
    Wilde, Frank
    [J]. GMS INTERDISCIPLINARY PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY DGPW, 2016, 5
  • [38] Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study
    Sittikornpaiboon, Paknisa
    Arunjaroensuk, Sirida
    Kaboosaya, Boosana
    Subbalekha, Keskanya
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (04) : 635 - 643
  • [39] The influence of crown coverage on the accuracy of static guided implant surgery in partially edentulous models: An in vitro study
    Wang, Zhen-yu
    Chao, Jia-rui
    Zheng, Jia-wen
    You, Meng
    Liu, Yang
    Shen, Jie-fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 115
  • [40] Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery for immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series study
    Li, Ping
    Zhao, Chunhui
    Chen, Jiahao
    Xu, Shulan
    Yang, Shuo
    Li, An
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024,