Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Advance Care Planning Self-efficacy Scale for Physicians

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Yanan [1 ]
Bai, Zhiling [2 ]
Cheng, Lin [3 ]
Zheng, Qin [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Mil Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Nursing, Shanghai 201805, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pharm, Kunming, Peoples R China
[3] 926th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force Chinese Peop, Mil Patient Management Sect, Kaiyuan, Peoples R China
关键词
advance care planning; self-efficacy; reliability; validity; FAMILY-MEMBERS; ADAPTATION; LIFE; RECOMMENDATIONS; WILLINGNESS; TRANSLATION; DEFINITION; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1177/08258597231185679
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Chinese patients prefer physicians to initiate advance care planning (ACP) conversations, but there is no appropriate tool to evaluate physicians' ACP self-efficacy level in mainland China. This study aimed to translate the ACP self-efficacy scale into Chinese (ACP-SEc) and measure its psychometric properties among clinical physicians. Method The original scale was translated by literal translation, synthesis, and reverse translation, according to Brislin's translation model. Seven experts were invited to further revise the scale and evaluate the content validity. 348 physicians were conveniently sampled to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale from May to June 2021 in 7 tertiary hospitals. Results The ACP-SEc contained 17 items, 1 dimension, with a total score of 17 to 85 points. In this study, the critical ratios of the items ranged from 12.533 to 23.306, the item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.619 to 0.839. The item-content validity index ranged from 0.86 to 1.00, and the average scale-level content validity index was 0.98. In total, 75.507% of the total variance was explained by 1 common factor. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting indices of the modified model were desirable. The ACP-SEc was moderately correlated with General Self-Efficacy Scale (r = 0.675, P < .001), and it differentiated between physician groups based on the knowledge level of ACP, palliative care or ACP-related training experience, attitude toward ACP, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with patients, and experience of discussing ACP with family and friends, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with family and friends (P <.05). The total Cronbach's & alpha; and test-retest reliability of the scale were .960 and .976, respectively. Conclusion The ACP-SEc shows good reliability and validity, and it can be used to assess the ACP self-efficacy level of physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 46
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Spanish version of the Prenatal Breast-feeding Self-efficacy Scale: Reliability and validity assessment
    Maria Pineiro-Albero, Rosa
    Diego Ramos-Pichardo, Juan
    Oliver-Roig, Antonio
    Velandrino-Nicolas, Antonio
    Richart-Martinez, Miguel
    Garcia-de-Leon-Gonzalez, Ricardo
    Wells, Kristen J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2013, 50 (10) : 1385 - 1390
  • [42] Reliability and aspects of validity of the Swedish version of self-efficacy for exercise scale for patients with chronic pain
    Dahlback, Angelica
    Andrell, Paulin
    Varkey, Emma
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (01) : 163 - 173
  • [43] The validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the Diabetes Mellitus Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES-I)
    Marlina, Theresia Titin
    Haryani
    Widyawati
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2024, 29 (08) : 666 - 678
  • [44] The Swedish Version of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form: Reliability and Validity Assessment
    Gerhardsson, Emma
    Nyqvist, Kerstin Hedberg
    Mattsson, Elisabet
    Volgsten, Helena
    Hildingsson, Ingegerd
    Funkquist, Eva-Lotta
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN LACTATION, 2014, 30 (03) : 340 - 345
  • [45] The Spanish version of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form: Reliability and validity assessment
    Oliver-Roig, Antoni
    d'Anglade-Gonzalez, Marta-Luisa
    Garcia-Garcia, Beatriz
    Silva-Tubio, Jose-Ramon
    Richart-Martinez, Miguel
    Dennis, Cindy-Lee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2012, 49 (02) : 169 - 173
  • [46] Reliability and validity evaluation of the appropriate antibiotic use self-efficacy scale for Chinese adults
    Liying Wang
    Chunguang Liang
    Haitao Yu
    Hui Zhang
    Xiangru Yan
    BMC Public Health, 22
  • [47] Reliability and validity evaluation of the appropriate antibiotic use self-efficacy scale for Chinese adults
    Wang, Liying
    Liang, Chunguang
    Yu, Haitao
    Zhang, Hui
    Yan, Xiangru
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [48] Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of First Aid in Home Accidents Self-Efficacy Scale
    Altundag, Sebahat
    Turan, Turkan
    Safak, Meryem
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 45 (01): : 71 - 78
  • [49] Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Self-Efficacy for Rehabilitation outcome scale in persons with knee osteoarthritis
    Andersson, Elke Liebenhagen
    Brogardh, Christina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2014, 16 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [50] Reliability and Validity of the Traditional Chinese Version of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: A Pilot Evaluation in Taiwanese Outpatients
    Wei, Fang-Chun
    Hsu, Chieh-Kuan
    Wu, Yu-Lin
    Liao, Jung-Yu
    Huang, Chi-Hsien
    Hsiung, Chao Agnes
    Yu, Sang-Ju
    Lin, Cheng-Pei
    Chen, Ping-Jen
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 37 (03) : 273 - 279