Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Advance Care Planning Self-efficacy Scale for Physicians

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Yanan [1 ]
Bai, Zhiling [2 ]
Cheng, Lin [3 ]
Zheng, Qin [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Mil Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Nursing, Shanghai 201805, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pharm, Kunming, Peoples R China
[3] 926th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force Chinese Peop, Mil Patient Management Sect, Kaiyuan, Peoples R China
关键词
advance care planning; self-efficacy; reliability; validity; FAMILY-MEMBERS; ADAPTATION; LIFE; RECOMMENDATIONS; WILLINGNESS; TRANSLATION; DEFINITION; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1177/08258597231185679
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Chinese patients prefer physicians to initiate advance care planning (ACP) conversations, but there is no appropriate tool to evaluate physicians' ACP self-efficacy level in mainland China. This study aimed to translate the ACP self-efficacy scale into Chinese (ACP-SEc) and measure its psychometric properties among clinical physicians. Method The original scale was translated by literal translation, synthesis, and reverse translation, according to Brislin's translation model. Seven experts were invited to further revise the scale and evaluate the content validity. 348 physicians were conveniently sampled to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale from May to June 2021 in 7 tertiary hospitals. Results The ACP-SEc contained 17 items, 1 dimension, with a total score of 17 to 85 points. In this study, the critical ratios of the items ranged from 12.533 to 23.306, the item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.619 to 0.839. The item-content validity index ranged from 0.86 to 1.00, and the average scale-level content validity index was 0.98. In total, 75.507% of the total variance was explained by 1 common factor. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting indices of the modified model were desirable. The ACP-SEc was moderately correlated with General Self-Efficacy Scale (r = 0.675, P < .001), and it differentiated between physician groups based on the knowledge level of ACP, palliative care or ACP-related training experience, attitude toward ACP, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with patients, and experience of discussing ACP with family and friends, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with family and friends (P <.05). The total Cronbach's & alpha; and test-retest reliability of the scale were .960 and .976, respectively. Conclusion The ACP-SEc shows good reliability and validity, and it can be used to assess the ACP self-efficacy level of physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 46
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale
    Moon, Kyesuk
    Kim, Yongseok
    Lee, Junghee
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SERVICE RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (03) : 333 - 341
  • [22] Development of a Scale to Assess Physician Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy
    Baughman, Kristin R.
    Ludwick, Ruth
    Fischbein, Rebecca
    McCormick, Kenelm
    Meeker, James
    Hewit, Mike
    Drost, Jennifer
    Kropp, Denise
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 34 (05): : 435 - 441
  • [23] Translation of self-efficacy scale (SCSES) stoma care instruments Indonesia version: Test validity and reliability
    Zainuddin, Masriani
    Syam, Yuliana
    Yusuf, Saldy
    ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2020, 30 : 439 - 443
  • [24] Validity and reliability study for the self-efficacy scale
    Beser, Ayse
    Bahar, Zuhal
    Aydogdu, Nihal Gordes
    Ersin, Fatma
    Kissal, Aygul
    HEALTHMED, 2012, 6 (01): : 195 - 200
  • [25] Reliability and validity of the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care Scale among nurses
    Heo, Seongkum
    Kim, Miyeong
    You, HyunMi
    Hong, Sun Woo
    An, Minjeong
    Yang, Jisun
    Kim, Hee Jung
    Shim, JaeLan
    Chon, SaeHyun
    Kim, JinShil
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2024, 22 (04) : 760 - 766
  • [26] The Chinese version of the self-efficacy scale for daily life activities among older adults: translation, validity and reliability
    Wang, Yuecong
    Jiang, Tianxiang
    Zhou, Fang
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2023, 54 : 46 - 53
  • [27] Translation and validation of the Chinese version of Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale
    Guo, Junchen
    Chen, Yongyi
    Shen, Boyong
    Peng, Wei
    Wang, Lianjun
    Dai, Yunyun
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2024,
  • [28] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-care Ability Scale for the Elderly
    Gao, Han
    Soderhamn, Ulrika
    Cliffordson, Christina
    Guo, Lina
    Guo, Qiyun
    Liu, Kun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2017, 26 (23-24) : 4489 - 4497
  • [29] Measuring Self-Efficacy and Readiness for Advance Care Planning in Chinese Older Adults
    Liu, Li
    Zhao, Ya-Yi
    Zhang, Li-Hui
    Chan, Helen Yue-Lai
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 60 (03) : 622 - 629
  • [30] Aspects of reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older people
    Rydwik, Elisabeth
    Hovmoller, Frida
    Bostrom, Carina
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2014, 30 (02) : 131 - 137