Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Advance Care Planning Self-efficacy Scale for Physicians

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Yanan [1 ]
Bai, Zhiling [2 ]
Cheng, Lin [3 ]
Zheng, Qin [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Mil Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Nursing, Shanghai 201805, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pharm, Kunming, Peoples R China
[3] 926th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force Chinese Peop, Mil Patient Management Sect, Kaiyuan, Peoples R China
关键词
advance care planning; self-efficacy; reliability; validity; FAMILY-MEMBERS; ADAPTATION; LIFE; RECOMMENDATIONS; WILLINGNESS; TRANSLATION; DEFINITION; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1177/08258597231185679
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Chinese patients prefer physicians to initiate advance care planning (ACP) conversations, but there is no appropriate tool to evaluate physicians' ACP self-efficacy level in mainland China. This study aimed to translate the ACP self-efficacy scale into Chinese (ACP-SEc) and measure its psychometric properties among clinical physicians. Method The original scale was translated by literal translation, synthesis, and reverse translation, according to Brislin's translation model. Seven experts were invited to further revise the scale and evaluate the content validity. 348 physicians were conveniently sampled to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale from May to June 2021 in 7 tertiary hospitals. Results The ACP-SEc contained 17 items, 1 dimension, with a total score of 17 to 85 points. In this study, the critical ratios of the items ranged from 12.533 to 23.306, the item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.619 to 0.839. The item-content validity index ranged from 0.86 to 1.00, and the average scale-level content validity index was 0.98. In total, 75.507% of the total variance was explained by 1 common factor. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting indices of the modified model were desirable. The ACP-SEc was moderately correlated with General Self-Efficacy Scale (r = 0.675, P < .001), and it differentiated between physician groups based on the knowledge level of ACP, palliative care or ACP-related training experience, attitude toward ACP, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with patients, and experience of discussing ACP with family and friends, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with family and friends (P <.05). The total Cronbach's & alpha; and test-retest reliability of the scale were .960 and .976, respectively. Conclusion The ACP-SEc shows good reliability and validity, and it can be used to assess the ACP self-efficacy level of physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 46
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Chinese version of the infertility self-efficacy scale: Reliability and validity assessment
    Xu, Jing
    Zhouchen, Yi-Bei
    Wang, Rong
    Redding, Sharon R.
    Fu, Dou
    Ouyang, Yan-Qiong
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (09)
  • [2] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses
    He, Taotao
    Chen, Yang
    Song, Caini
    Li, Chaoqun
    Liu, Jia
    Huang, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2023, 10 (04) : 503 - 510
  • [3] Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses
    Zhen Yang
    Huan Wang
    Aiping Wang
    BMC Palliative Care, 21
  • [4] Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses
    Yang, Zhen
    Wang, Huan
    Wang, Aiping
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [5] Reliability and Validity Assessment of the Chinese Version of MBI-PPD Self-efficacy Scale
    Chen, Hao
    Liu, Chao
    Liu, Chia-Yi
    Lo, Liang-Ming
    Lin, Rungtai
    Huang, Ding-Hau
    Chiou, Wen-Ko
    CROSS-CULTURAL DESIGN-APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, LEARNING, COMMUNICATION, AND CREATIVITY, CCD 2020, PT II, 2020, 12193 : 12 - 24
  • [6] The validity and reliability of Turkish version of the self-efficacy scale in nursing care of children with epilepsy
    Capa, Zehra
    Karadag, Gulendam
    Kul, Seval
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2023, 71 : e97 - e103
  • [7] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of human-robot interaction self-efficacy scale in Chinese adults
    Gao, Huixin
    Wang, Wei
    Huang, Chengli
    Xie, Xinru
    Wang, Duming
    Gao, Wei
    Cai, Jie
    PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA, 2024, 37 (01):
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale in mainland China
    Sun, Liang
    Yang, Shu-min
    Wu, Hui
    Chen, Bing
    Wang, Chong-jian
    Li, Xiao-fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2017, 28 (08) : 829 - 837
  • [9] Translation, Validity, and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Breast Cancer Survivor Self-efficacy Scale in China
    Yuan, Xiaoling
    Wu, Fulei
    Howell, Doris
    Yuan, Changrong
    CANCER NURSING, 2019, 42 (05) : E31 - E40
  • [10] A preliminary reliability and validity study of the Chinese version of the self-efficacy for exercise scale for older adults
    Lee, Ling-Ling
    Perng, Shoa-Jen
    Ho, Chin-Chih
    Hsu, Hsiang-Ming
    Lau, Shu-Chuan
    Arthur, Antony
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2009, 46 (02) : 230 - 238