Review of the Terminology, Approaches, and Formulations Used in the Guidelines on Quantitative Risk Assessment of Chemical Hazards in Food

被引:3
|
作者
Domenech, Eva [1 ]
Martorell, Sebastian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Univ Ingn Alimentos Food UPV, Camino Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Chem & Nucl Engn, MEDASEGI Res Grp, Camino Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
health risk; safety margin; cancer risk; margin of exposure; hazard index; hazard quotient; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; HUMAN HEALTH-RISK; HEAVY-METAL CONTAMINATION; EDIBLE VEGETABLE-OILS; DIETARY EXPOSURE; PESTICIDE-RESIDUES; MEAT-PRODUCTS; NONCARCINOGENIC RISK; COMPLEMENTARY FOODS; SEASONAL-VARIATION;
D O I
10.3390/foods13050714
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This paper reviews the published terminology, mathematical models, and the possible approaches used to characterise the risk of foodborne chemical hazards, particularly pesticides, metals, mycotoxins, acrylamide, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The results confirmed the wide variability of the nomenclature used, e.g., 28 different ways of referencing exposure, 13 of cancer risk, or 9 of slope factor. On the other hand, a total of 16 equations were identified to formulate all the risk characterisation parameters of interest. Therefore, the present study proposes a terminology and formulation for some risk characterisation parameters based on the guidelines of international organisations and the literature review. The mathematical model used for non-genotoxic hazards is a ratio in all cases. However, the authors used the probability of cancer or different ratios, such as the margin of exposure (MOE) for genotoxic hazards. For each effect studied per hazard, the non-genotoxic effect was mostly studied in pesticides (79.73%), the genotoxic effect was mostly studied in PAHs (71.15%), and both effects were mainly studied in metals (59.4%). The authors of the works reviewed generally opted for a deterministic approach, although most of those who assessed the risk for mycotoxins or the ratio and risk for acrylamide used the probabilistic approach.
引用
收藏
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Novel Approaches for Risk Assessment of Phytochemicals in Food
    Eisenbrand, Gerhard
    MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH, 2010, 54 (02) : 173 - 173
  • [22] Fuzzy risk assessment tool for microbial hazards in food systems
    Davidson, VJ
    Ryks, J
    Fazil, A
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2006, 157 (09) : 1201 - 1210
  • [24] A systematic review of models used in quantitative benefit-risk assessment of rotavirus vaccination
    Arlegui, Hugo
    Nachbaur, Gaelle
    Begaud, Bernard
    Praet, Nicolas
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 491 - 491
  • [25] CHEMICAL RISK ASSESSMENT - A REVIEW
    HOPPER, LD
    OEHME, FW
    VETERINARY AND HUMAN TOXICOLOGY, 1989, 31 (06) : 543 - 554
  • [26] Food and beverage can coatings: A review on chemical analysis, migration, and risk assessment
    Lestido-Cardama, Antia
    Sendon, Raquel
    Bustos, Juana
    Nieto, Maria Teresa
    Paseiro-Losada, Perfecto
    Rodriguez-Bernaldo de Quiros, Ana
    COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY, 2022, 21 (04) : 3558 - 3611
  • [27] Principles of systematic approaches for chemical risk assessment
    Hanberg, A.
    Zilliacus, J.
    Beronius, A.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S22 - S23
  • [28] Methodological approaches to assessing risk perceptions associated with food-related hazards
    Frewer, LJ
    Howard, C
    Hedderley, D
    Shepherd, R
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1998, 18 (01) : 95 - 102
  • [29] Cardiovascular Risk Assessment A Systematic Review of Guidelines
    Khanji, Mohammed Y.
    Bicalho, Vinicius V. S.
    van Waardhuizen, Claudia N.
    Ferket, Bart S.
    Petersen, Steffen E.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 165 (10) : 713 - +
  • [30] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Stratev, Deyan
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21