Cardiovascular Risk Assessment A Systematic Review of Guidelines

被引:45
|
作者
Khanji, Mohammed Y. [1 ]
Bicalho, Vinicius V. S. [4 ]
van Waardhuizen, Claudia N. [2 ]
Ferket, Bart S. [3 ]
Petersen, Steffen E. [1 ]
Hunink, M. G. Myriam [2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Charterhouse Sq, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[2] Erasmus MC, Room Na 2818,POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, One Gustave L Levy Pl,Box 1077, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Univ Juiz de Fora, Sch Med, Rua Jose Lourenco Kelmer,Martelos S-N, BR-36036330 Juiz De Fora, MG, Brazil
关键词
HIGH BLOOD-PRESSURE; TASK-FORCE; DISEASE PREVENTION; HEALTH CHECKS; RECOMMENDATIONS; CHOLESTEROL; HEART; METAANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.7326/M16-1110
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Many guidelines exist for screening and risk assessment for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy persons. Purpose: To systematically review current primary prevention guidelines on adult cardiovascular risk assessment and highlight the similarities and differences to aid clinician decision making. Data Sources: Publications in MEDLINE and CINAHL between 3 May 2009 and 30 June 2016 were identified. On 30 June 2016, the Guidelines International Network International Guideline Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, and Web sites of organizations responsible for guideline development were searched. Study Selection: 2 reviewers screened titles and abstracts to identify guidelines from Western countries containing recommendations for cardiovascular risk assessment for healthy adults. Data Extraction: 2 reviewers independently assessed rigor of guideline development using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument, and 1 extracted the recommendations. Data Synthesis: Of the 21 guidelines, 17 showed considerable rigor of development. These recommendations address assessment of total cardiovascular risk (5 guidelines), dysglycemia (7 guidelines), dyslipidemia (2 guidelines), and hypertension (3 guidelines). All but 1 recommendation advocates for screening, and most include prediction models integrating several relatively simple risk factors for either deciding on further screening or guiding subsequent management. No consensus on the strategy for screening, recommended target population, screening tests, or treatment thresholds exists. Limitation: Only guidelines developed by Western national or international medical organizations were included. Conclusion: Considerable discrepancies in cardiovascular screening guidelines still exist, with no consensus on optimum screening strategies or treatment threshold.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic Review of Guidelines on Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Which Recommendations Should Clinicians Follow for a Cardiovascular Health Check?
    Ferket, Bart S.
    Colkesen, Ersen B.
    Visser, Jacob J.
    Spronk, Sandra
    Kraaijenhagen, Roderik A.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 170 (01) : 27 - 40
  • [2] Lifestyle advice and interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction: A systematic review of guidelines
    Khanji, Mohammed Y.
    van Waardhuizen, Claudia N.
    Bicalho, Vinicius V. S.
    Ferket, Bart S.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    Petersen, Steffen E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 263 : 142 - 151
  • [3] NEW GUIDELINES ON CARDIOVASCULAR RISK ASSESSMENT
    Wong, N. D.
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 128 : 89 - 89
  • [4] Guidelines on cardiovascular risk assessment and management
    Wood, DA
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 7 (0L) : L5 - L10
  • [5] Cardiovascular risk assessment scores for people with diabetes: a systematic review
    P. Chamnan
    R. K. Simmons
    S. J. Sharp
    S. J. Griffin
    N. J. Wareham
    [J]. Diabetologia, 2009, 52
  • [6] Cardiovascular risk assessment scores for people with diabetes: a systematic review
    Chamnan, P.
    Simmons, R. K.
    Sharp, S. J.
    Griffin, S. J.
    Wareham, N. J.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2009, 52 (10) : 2001 - 2014
  • [7] Systematic Literature Review of Risk Assessment Techniques, Standard and Guidelines for Railway
    Hendra, Franka
    Mohammad, Roslina
    Amrin, Astuty
    Maarop, Nurazean
    Zagloel, Teuku Yuri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 15 (04): : 1148 - 1161
  • [8] Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews
    Collins, Dylan R. J.
    Tompson, Alice C.
    Onakpoya, Igho J.
    Roberts, Nia
    Ward, Alison M.
    Heneghan, Carl J.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [9] Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander absolute cardiovascular risk assessment and management: systematic review of evidence to inform national guidelines
    Paige, Ellie
    Jenkins, Lily O'Donoughue
    Agostino, Jason
    Pennings, Susan
    Wade, Vick
    Lovett, Raymond
    Daluwatta, Amanda
    McLoughlin, Kirstie
    Banks, Emily
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2020, 30 (02):
  • [10] Guidelines for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Cholesterol Treatment
    Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.
    Goff, David C., Jr.
    Stone, Neil J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (21): : 2235 - 2235