Cardiovascular Risk Assessment A Systematic Review of Guidelines

被引:45
|
作者
Khanji, Mohammed Y. [1 ]
Bicalho, Vinicius V. S. [4 ]
van Waardhuizen, Claudia N. [2 ]
Ferket, Bart S. [3 ]
Petersen, Steffen E. [1 ]
Hunink, M. G. Myriam [2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Charterhouse Sq, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[2] Erasmus MC, Room Na 2818,POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, One Gustave L Levy Pl,Box 1077, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Univ Juiz de Fora, Sch Med, Rua Jose Lourenco Kelmer,Martelos S-N, BR-36036330 Juiz De Fora, MG, Brazil
关键词
HIGH BLOOD-PRESSURE; TASK-FORCE; DISEASE PREVENTION; HEALTH CHECKS; RECOMMENDATIONS; CHOLESTEROL; HEART; METAANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.7326/M16-1110
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Many guidelines exist for screening and risk assessment for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy persons. Purpose: To systematically review current primary prevention guidelines on adult cardiovascular risk assessment and highlight the similarities and differences to aid clinician decision making. Data Sources: Publications in MEDLINE and CINAHL between 3 May 2009 and 30 June 2016 were identified. On 30 June 2016, the Guidelines International Network International Guideline Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, and Web sites of organizations responsible for guideline development were searched. Study Selection: 2 reviewers screened titles and abstracts to identify guidelines from Western countries containing recommendations for cardiovascular risk assessment for healthy adults. Data Extraction: 2 reviewers independently assessed rigor of guideline development using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument, and 1 extracted the recommendations. Data Synthesis: Of the 21 guidelines, 17 showed considerable rigor of development. These recommendations address assessment of total cardiovascular risk (5 guidelines), dysglycemia (7 guidelines), dyslipidemia (2 guidelines), and hypertension (3 guidelines). All but 1 recommendation advocates for screening, and most include prediction models integrating several relatively simple risk factors for either deciding on further screening or guiding subsequent management. No consensus on the strategy for screening, recommended target population, screening tests, or treatment thresholds exists. Limitation: Only guidelines developed by Western national or international medical organizations were included. Conclusion: Considerable discrepancies in cardiovascular screening guidelines still exist, with no consensus on optimum screening strategies or treatment threshold.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interventions to improve adherence to cardiovascular disease guidelines: a systematic review
    Jeffery, Rebecca A.
    To, Matthew J.
    Hayduk-Costa, Gabrielle
    Cameron, Adam
    Taylor, Cameron
    Van Zoost, Colin
    Hayden, Jill A.
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2015, 16
  • [22] Interventions to improve adherence to cardiovascular disease guidelines: a systematic review
    Rebecca A. Jeffery
    Matthew J. To
    Gabrielle Hayduk-Costa
    Adam Cameron
    Cameron Taylor
    Colin Van Zoost
    Jill A. Hayden
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [23] Incidence of and Risk Assessment for Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review
    Konerman, Monica A.
    Fritze, Danielle
    Weinberg, Richard L.
    Sonnenday, Christopher J.
    Sharma, Pratima
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 101 (07) : 1645 - 1657
  • [24] Are cardiovascular disease risk assessment and management programmes cost effective? A systematic review of the evidence
    Lee, John Tayu
    Lawson, Kenny D.
    Wan, Yizhou
    Majeed, Azeem
    Morris, Stephen
    Soljak, Michael
    Millett, Christopher
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 99 : 49 - 57
  • [26] Cardiovascular risk in axial spondyloarthritis—a systematic review
    Rainer Hintenberger
    Barbara Affenzeller
    Valeriia Vladychuk
    Herwig Pieringer
    [J]. Clinical Rheumatology, 2023, 42 : 2621 - 2633
  • [27] NUTRITION RISK ASSESSMENT, GUIDELINES, AND PROTOCOL IN THE ICU: 5-YEAR REVIEW OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Javeed, Suha Na
    Qadeer, Asem
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [28] Living Guidelines for Absolute Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Management
    Paige, Ellie
    Agostino, Jason
    Phillips, Christine
    Elliott, Julian
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    Connell, Cia
    Kowalski, Melanie
    Jenkins, Lily O'Donoughue
    Daluwatta, Amanda
    Banks, Emily
    [J]. HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2019, 28 (06): : 829 - 832
  • [29] Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Prevention Current Guidelines and Limitations
    Alagona, Peter, Jr.
    Ahmad, Tariq Ali
    [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 99 (04) : 711 - +
  • [30] Methodological quality of systematic reviews comprising clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery
    Jacobsen, Samuel M.
    Douglas, Alexander
    Smith, Caleb A.
    Roberts, Will
    Ottwell, Ryan
    Oglesby, Benson
    Yasler, Coy
    Torgerson, Trevor
    Hartwell, Micah
    Vassar, Matt
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 127 (06) : 905 - 916