Repugnant innovation

被引:2
|
作者
Allen, Darcy W. E. [1 ]
Berg, Chris [1 ]
Davidson, Sinclair [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, RMIT Blockchain Innovat Hub, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Evasive entrepreneurship; innovation economics; institutional entrepreneurship; repugnant innovation; repugnant markets; SEX WORK; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; ECONOMICS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1017/S1744137422000364
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Repugnant innovation is a form of evasive entrepreneurship that occurs in repugnant markets. Repugnance is an informal institution - controlled by long-lived norms, attitudes, customs and traditions - and repugnant innovation acts to shift institutions at the lowest level of the institutional stack. The paper considers three examples of repugnant innovation: e-cigarettes, online gambling, and webcam modelling. Each repugnant innovation challenges the complex mixture of material and moral concerns that contributes to repugnance in their respective markets. The paper adds to and expands on a body of evidence about innovation in apparently unsupportive institutional environments.
引用
收藏
页码:918 / 929
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Repugnant Conclusion and Utilitarianism under Domain Restrictions
    Shiell, Leslie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMIC THEORY, 2008, 10 (06) : 1011 - 1031
  • [42] What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?
    Zuber, Stephane
    Venkatesh, Nikhil
    Tannsjo, Torbjorn
    Tarsney, Christian
    Stefansson, H. Orri
    Steele, Katie
    Spears, Dean
    Sebo, Jeff
    Pivato, Marcus
    Ord, Toby
    Ng, Yew-Kwang
    Masny, Michal
    MacAskill, William
    Lawson, Nicholas
    Kuruc, Kevin
    Hutchinson, Michelle
    Gustafsson, Johan E.
    Greaves, Hilary
    Forsberg, Lisa
    Fleurbaey, Marc
    Coffey, Diane
    Cato, Susumu
    Castro, Clinton
    Campbell, Tim
    Budolfson, Mark
    Broome, John
    Berger, Alexander
    Beckstead, Nick
    Asheim, Geir B.
    [J]. UTILITAS, 2021, 33 (04) : 379 - 383
  • [43] Parfit's puzzle (States of affairs, Repugnant Conclusion)
    Kitcher, P
    [J]. NOUS, 2000, 34 (04): : 550 - 577
  • [44] Does the repugnant conclusion have any probative force?
    Christopher Cowie
    [J]. Philosophical Studies, 2017, 174 : 3021 - 3039
  • [45] The voidness of repugnant statutes:: Another look at the meeting of Marbury
    Feldman, N
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 148 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [46] REPUGNANT EXCEPTION CLAUSE IN ACCIDENT INSURANCE - INTENTIONAL ACT
    Mahoney, John J., Jr.
    [J]. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1924, 10 (03) : 230 - 232
  • [47] Economic analyses of repugnant market transactions: a modest typology
    Cserne, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 19 (06) : 930 - 943
  • [48] Does the repugnant conclusion have any probative force?
    Cowie, Christopher
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2017, 174 (12) : 3021 - 3039
  • [49] Imprecise lexical superiority and the (slightly less) Repugnant Conclusion
    Fanciullo, James
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2019, 176 (08) : 2103 - 2117
  • [50] "... Common sense, not repugnant to ..."? Catholic Eugenics in Austria before 1938
    Turda, Marius
    [J]. SOCIAL HISTORY OF MEDICINE, 2010, 23 (02) : 408 - 412