What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?

被引:18
|
作者
Zuber, Stephane
Venkatesh, Nikhil
Tannsjo, Torbjorn
Tarsney, Christian
Stefansson, H. Orri
Steele, Katie
Spears, Dean [1 ]
Sebo, Jeff
Pivato, Marcus
Ord, Toby
Ng, Yew-Kwang
Masny, Michal
MacAskill, William
Lawson, Nicholas
Kuruc, Kevin
Hutchinson, Michelle
Gustafsson, Johan E.
Greaves, Hilary
Forsberg, Lisa
Fleurbaey, Marc
Coffey, Diane
Cato, Susumu
Castro, Clinton
Campbell, Tim
Budolfson, Mark
Broome, John
Berger, Alexander
Beckstead, Nick
Asheim, Geir B.
机构
[1] Paris Sch Econ, Paris, France
关键词
FUTURE GENERATIONS; IMPOSSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1017/S095382082100011X
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The Repugnant Conclusion is an implication of some approaches to population ethics. It states, in Derek Parfit's original formulation, For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better, even though its members have lives that are barely worth living. (Parfit 1984: 388) Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 383
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条