The hardness of random quantum circuits

被引:6
|
作者
Movassagh, Ramis [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MIT IBM Watson AI Lab, IBM Quantum, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Google Quantum, Venice, CA 90291 USA
关键词
ALGORITHMS; SUPREMACY;
D O I
10.1038/s41567-023-02131-2
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Quantum computers are believed to exponentially outperform classical computers at some tasks, but it is hard to make guarantees about the limits of classical computers. It has now been proven that classical computers cannot efficiently simulate most quantum circuits. As Moore's law reaches its limits, quantum computers are emerging that hold promise to dramatically outperform classical computers. It is now possible to build quantum processors with over 100 qubits, which are expected to be beyond the reach of classical simulation. These developments have been accompanied by the anticipation that, at some stage, a quantum computer should be able to perform a task that is practically impossible for any classical computer. The lead candidate for reaching this threshold is random circuit sampling, which involves sampling the output of a quantum computer after implementing a sequence of random quantum operations. However, it is difficult to provide theoretical guarantees on the hardness of simulating random quantum circuits by classical computers. Here we prove that estimating the output probabilities of random quantum circuits is #P-hard for any classical computer. We also extend our results to a restricted model of quantum computation known as instantaneous quantum polynomial-time (IQP) circuits. We achieve this by a worst-case to average-case reduction for quantum-circuit simulation. The robustness of our result to the estimation error serves as a new hardness criterion for the performance of classical algorithms. Our results suggest that there is an exponential hardness barrier for the approximate classical simulation of most quantum circuits.
引用
收藏
页码:1719 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The hardness of random quantum circuits
    Ramis Movassagh
    Nature Physics, 2023, 19 : 1719 - 1724
  • [2] Random Quantum Circuits
    Fisher, Matthew P. A.
    Khemani, Vedika
    Nahum, Adam
    Vijay, Sagar
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, 2023, 14 : 335 - 379
  • [3] Decoupling with Random Quantum Circuits
    Brown, Winton
    Fawzi, Omar
    COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 340 (03) : 867 - 900
  • [4] Decoupling with Random Quantum Circuits
    Winton Brown
    Omar Fawzi
    Communications in Mathematical Physics, 2015, 340 : 867 - 900
  • [5] QUANTUM HARDNESS OF LEARNING SHALLOW CLASSICAL CIRCUITS
    Arunachalam, Srinivasan
    Grilo, Alex Bredariol
    Sundaram, Aarthi
    SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2021, 50 (03) : 972 - 1013
  • [6] Random projection using random quantum circuits
    Kumaran, Keerthi
    Sajjan, Manas
    Oh, Sangchul
    Kais, Sabre
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2024, 6 (01):
  • [7] Quantum supremacy and hardness of estimating output probabilities of quantum circuits
    Kondo, Yasuhiro
    Mori, Ryuhei
    Movassagh, Ramis
    2021 IEEE 62ND ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS 2021), 2022, : 1296 - 1307
  • [8] Convergence conditions for random quantum circuits
    Emerson, J
    Livine, E
    Lloyd, S
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2005, 72 (06):
  • [9] Magic spreading in random quantum circuits
    Turkeshi, Xhek
    Tirrito, Emanuele
    Sierant, Piotr
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 16 (01)
  • [10] Quantum and Classical Dynamics with Random Permutation Circuits
    Bertini, Bruno
    Klobas, Katja
    Kos, Pavel
    Malz, Daniel
    PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2025, 15 (01):