The hardness of random quantum circuits

被引:6
|
作者
Movassagh, Ramis [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MIT IBM Watson AI Lab, IBM Quantum, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Google Quantum, Venice, CA 90291 USA
关键词
ALGORITHMS; SUPREMACY;
D O I
10.1038/s41567-023-02131-2
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Quantum computers are believed to exponentially outperform classical computers at some tasks, but it is hard to make guarantees about the limits of classical computers. It has now been proven that classical computers cannot efficiently simulate most quantum circuits. As Moore's law reaches its limits, quantum computers are emerging that hold promise to dramatically outperform classical computers. It is now possible to build quantum processors with over 100 qubits, which are expected to be beyond the reach of classical simulation. These developments have been accompanied by the anticipation that, at some stage, a quantum computer should be able to perform a task that is practically impossible for any classical computer. The lead candidate for reaching this threshold is random circuit sampling, which involves sampling the output of a quantum computer after implementing a sequence of random quantum operations. However, it is difficult to provide theoretical guarantees on the hardness of simulating random quantum circuits by classical computers. Here we prove that estimating the output probabilities of random quantum circuits is #P-hard for any classical computer. We also extend our results to a restricted model of quantum computation known as instantaneous quantum polynomial-time (IQP) circuits. We achieve this by a worst-case to average-case reduction for quantum-circuit simulation. The robustness of our result to the estimation error serves as a new hardness criterion for the performance of classical algorithms. Our results suggest that there is an exponential hardness barrier for the approximate classical simulation of most quantum circuits.
引用
收藏
页码:1719 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMMUTING QUANTUM CIRCUITS: EFFICIENT CLASSICAL SIMULATIONS VERSUS HARDNESS RESULTS
    Ni, Xiaotong
    van den Nest, Maarten
    QUANTUM INFORMATION & COMPUTATION, 2013, 13 (1-2) : 54 - 72
  • [22] Random Quantum Circuits are Approximate 2-designs
    Aram W. Harrow
    Richard A. Low
    Communications in Mathematical Physics, 2009, 291 : 257 - 302
  • [23] Quantum Coding with Low-Depth Random Circuits
    Gullans, Michael J.
    Krastanov, Stefan
    Huse, David A.
    Jiang, Liang
    Flammia, Steven T.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2021, 11 (03)
  • [24] Random-Matrix Models of Monitored Quantum Circuits
    Bulchandani, Vir B.
    Sondhi, S. L.
    Chalker, J. T.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 191 (05)
  • [25] Efficiency of producing random unitary matrices with quantum circuits
    Arnaud, Ludovic
    Braun, Daniel
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2008, 78 (06):
  • [26] Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circuits
    Jian, Chao-Ming
    You, Yi-Zhuang
    Vasseur, Romain
    Ludwig, Andreas W. W.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2020, 101 (10)
  • [27] Localization with random time-periodic quantum circuits
    Suenderhauf, Christoph
    Perez-Garcia, David
    Huse, David A.
    Schuch, Norbert
    Ignacio Cirac, J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2018, 98 (13)
  • [28] Ensembles of physical states and random quantum circuits on graphs
    Hamma, Alioscia
    Santra, Siddhartha
    Zanardi, Paolo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2012, 86 (05):
  • [29] Quantum complexity phase transitions in monitored random circuits
    Suzuki, Ryotaro
    Haferkamp, Jonas
    Eisert, Jens
    Faist, Philippe
    QUANTUM, 2025, 9
  • [30] Random Quantum Circuits are Approximate 2-designs
    Harrow, Aram W.
    Low, Richard A.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 291 (01) : 257 - 302