Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Lin, Haomin [1 ]
Zhang, Jinchang [1 ]
Li, Xujia [1 ]
Li, Yuanquan [2 ]
Su, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gen Surg Hepatobiliary Surg, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Network meta-analysis; Gallbladder diseases; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SITE CHOLECYSTECTOMY; PORT; MULTICENTER; COSMESIS;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-022-01387-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Benign gallbladder diseases are common in surgery department, and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard procedure for benign diseases of gallbladder. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is conventionally performed using four laparoscopic ports. However, the clinical application of different LCs is equivocal and there is no comprehensive comparison to explore which surgical options could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases. A network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of the different LCs could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases by comprehensive comparison. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochran Library. Totally, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1627) met study selection criteria and were incorporated in this NMA study. The first ranking probabilities of the five surgical options to alleviate postoperative pain scores were: 54.4% for single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC), 25.2% for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SALC), and 24.9% for mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Mini). The first ranking probabilities for reducing postoperative complications in the surgical options were: 61.3% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 21.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing hospital stay(days) in the surgical options were: 32.3% for SIRC, 29.0% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 19.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing operation time showed that the three-port technique had the shortest operation time, followed by three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (51.3%), four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (26.8%), and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (21.6%). Our study found that the optimal surgical plan for different outcomes varies, making it difficult to give a comprehensive recommendation. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be the best options in terms of reducing surgical complications and operative time. Meanwhile, SIRC is the best options for relieving postoperative pain relief. SIRC and three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce hospital stay (days) compared other LCs.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing Single-Incision to 4-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Lesperance, Richard
    Tsai, John W.
    Penn, Charles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (04) : 755 - 756
  • [32] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical trial study
    Dabbagh, Najmeh
    Soroosh, Ahmadreza
    Khorgami, Zhamak
    Shojaeifard, Abolfazl
    Jafari, Mehdi
    Abdehgah, Ali Ghorbani
    Mahmudzade, Hossein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 20 (12): : 1153 - 1159
  • [33] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes
    Yamazaki, Masato
    Yasuda, Hideki
    Koda, Keiji
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2015, 45 (05) : 537 - 548
  • [34] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes
    Masato Yamazaki
    Hideki Yasuda
    Keiji Koda
    [J]. Surgery Today, 2015, 45 : 537 - 548
  • [35] Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Melissa S. Phillips
    Jeffrey M. Marks
    Kurt Roberts
    Roberto Tacchino
    Raymond Onders
    George DeNoto
    Homero Rivas
    Arsalla Islam
    Nathaniel Soper
    Gary Gecelter
    Eugene Rubach
    Paraskevas Paraskeva
    Sajani Shah
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1296 - 1303
  • [36] Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Phillips, Melissa S.
    Marks, Jeffrey M.
    Roberts, Kurt
    Tacchino, Roberto
    Onders, Raymond
    DeNoto, George
    Rivas, Homero
    Islam, Arsalla
    Soper, Nathaniel
    Gecelter, Gary
    Rubach, Eugene
    Paraskeva, Paraskevas
    Shah, Sajani
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (05): : 1296 - 1303
  • [37] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Cholecystectomy A Retrospective Comparison With 4-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Chow, Andre
    Purkayastha, Sanjay
    Aziz, Omer
    Pefanis, Dina
    Paraskeva, Paraskevas
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 145 (12) : 1187 - 1191
  • [38] Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alberto Arezzo
    Gitana Scozzari
    Federico Famiglietti
    Roberto Passera
    Mario Morino
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 2293 - 2304
  • [39] Single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rudiman, Reno
    Hanafi, Ricarhdo Valentino
    Almawijaya, Almawijaya
    [J]. ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2023, 7 (05): : 709 - 718
  • [40] Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arezzo, Alberto
    Scozzari, Gitana
    Famiglietti, Federico
    Passera, Roberto
    Morino, Mario
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (07): : 2293 - 2304