Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes

被引:22
|
作者
Yamazaki, Masato [1 ]
Yasuda, Hideki [2 ]
Koda, Keiji [1 ]
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Chiba Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Ichihara, Chiba 2990111, Japan
[2] Teikyo Heisei Univ, Fac Reg Hlth Therapy, Ichihara, Chiba 2990111, Japan
关键词
SILC; Methodology; Complication; Operative procedure; Minimally invasive surgery; MULTIPORT CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SURGERY; PORT; METAANALYSIS; INSTRUMENTS; EXPERIENCE; SILC;
D O I
10.1007/s00595-014-0908-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose (1) To survey the dissemination of SILC; (2) to determine which SILC method has become mainstream; (3) to determine whether the characteristic complications vary according to the type of procedure. Methods An electronic search of PubMed, Databases@Ovid, and SciVerse Scopus between 2003/01/01 and 2012/12/31 was performed. Results The peak number of annually published articles was 70 in 2011. The most common procedures were single skin incision, the use of a SILS Port(A (R)), suture suspension and a 5-mm oblique scope. The intraoperative complications rate was 1.69 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 213/5283 cases. According to the surgical procedure, five factors (approach; P = 0.0017, gallbladder anchorage; P < 0.001, size; P = 0.049 and type; P < 0.001 of the scope, and size of the clip applier; P = 0.074) significantly affected the incidence of wound infection. The incidence of wound seroma/bleeding was significantly influenced by gallbladder anchorage (P = 0.009), the use of curved/articulated instruments (P = 0.048), and the diameter of the clip applier (P < 0.001). Conclusion To determine the best operative procedure for SILC, an analysis of uniform operative procedures is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 548
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes
    Masato Yamazaki
    Hideki Yasuda
    Keiji Koda
    [J]. Surgery Today, 2015, 45 : 537 - 548
  • [2] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Stavros A. Antoniou
    Rudolph Pointner
    Frank A. Granderath
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 367 - 377
  • [3] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Antoniou, Stavros A.
    Pointner, Rudolph
    Granderath, Frank A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (02): : 367 - 377
  • [4] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy A Systematic Review
    Hall, Thomas C.
    Dennison, Ashley R.
    Bilku, Dilraj K.
    Metcalfe, Matthew S.
    Garcea, Giuseppe
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (07) : 657 - 666
  • [5] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it work? A systematic review
    Lirici, Marco Maria
    Tierno, Simone Maria
    Ponzano, Cecilia
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (10): : 4389 - 4399
  • [6] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it work? A systematic review
    Marco Maria Lirici
    Simone Maria Tierno
    Cecilia Ponzano
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 4389 - 4399
  • [7] Single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Sun, Ning
    Zhang, Jia Lin
    Zhang, Cheng Shuo
    Li, Xiao Hang
    Shi, Yue
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (36)
  • [8] Robotic Single-Incision Cholecystectomy vs Laparoscopic Single-Incision Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Amanda Cyntia
    Nunes, Gabrielle Amaral
    Murari, Jean C.
    Andrade, Fernando Pontes
    Alencar, Mayara D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S315 - S315
  • [9] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Biebl, Matthias
    Laimer, Elisabeth
    Klaus, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (01) : 139 - 139
  • [10] SINGLE-INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    Gupta, Nikhil
    Arora, Mohinder P.
    [J]. SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (12) : 855 - 855